Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.building
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom, the trouble with using gallons per hour is that it doesn't measure
fuel economy. If I burn twice the gallons per hour, but go three times as fast, then burning at the higher rate yields greater economy. I will grant that if you are comparing identical boats at identical speeds then gallons per hour would give the desired result. BS tomdownard wrote: The reason we measure boats in gallons per hour and not miles per hour? Wind and current make miles per hour impractical. With the current against you, the engine can be running at 6000 RPM for an hour and you have only covered two miles. I have seen that in the Inside Passage around the Fraiser River. Too big of a veriable there. RPM's and fuel used can be realistically monitored. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats.building
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The only measure that makes sense is miles per gallon, drift, tide,
wind effects excluded, your choice of units.. Calculated against dollers per hour time on vacations aboard (what price freedom?) I calculate time at 10 bucks an hour for me, shopping for bargains, whatever. The guests can do as they please. Terry K |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats.building
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Terry K wrote:
The only measure that makes sense is miles per gallon, drift, tide, wind effects excluded, your choice of units.. Calculated against dollers per hour time on vacations aboard (what price freedom?) I calculate time at 10 bucks an hour for me, shopping for bargains, whatever. The guests can do as they please. Terry K Someone receintly said that as long as gas cost less than designer water nobody was ging to worry about it. Now there's a place in NYC selling water for over $50 a quart. And people are buying it!!! Richard |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|