BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   Boat Building (https://www.boatbanter.com/boat-building/)
-   -   Where is hull design going? (https://www.boatbanter.com/boat-building/6285-where-hull-design-going.html)

gjoyce November 10th 03 12:19 PM

Where is hull design going?
 
I figured this erudite group could point me in the correct direction.
I've been
cruising thru a variety of naval research sites, but was wondering
what you
designer-types might think.

Where do you see hull design - shapes, materials, coatings,
propulsion, etc. - going in the near - and not so near - future?


Thanks

Gary P. Joyce

Stephen Baker November 10th 03 01:23 PM

Where is hull design going?
 
gjoyce asks:

Where do you see hull design - shapes, materials, coatings,
propulsion, etc. - going in the near - and not so near - future?


That's like asking Ferrari what they will be doing aerodynamically on their
next Formula One car. Or asking Ford what the next Focus will look like.
Good luck, though ;-)

Steve
Stephen C. Baker - Yacht Designer
http://members.aol.com/SailDesign/pr...cbweb/home.htm

Chris November 10th 03 01:40 PM

Where is hull design going?
 

"gjoyce" wrote in message
m...
I figured this erudite group could point me in the correct direction.
I've been
cruising thru a variety of naval research sites, but was wondering
what you
designer-types might think.

Where do you see hull design - shapes, materials, coatings,
propulsion, etc. - going in the near - and not so near - future?


Thanks

Gary P. Joyce


Well, I think they'll be working alot more IR/Radar-defeating surfaces into
construction, stealth technologies, crew-automation...

I see afew multihulls on the design table, lots of efforts to reduce
ship/crew size, increase efficiency, defenses seem to be focusing towards
anti-missile lately. If you'll notice, alot more design-process proposals
are coming out for smaller naval vessels, with less focus on the larger
carrier vessels. The Aircraft Carrier of today doesn't look much different
than it did in WW2-era. Not so for the destroyer or frigate of today's
Navy.




gjoyce November 11th 03 12:33 AM

Where is hull design going?
 
ospam (Stephen Baker) wrote in message ...
gjoyce asks:

Where do you see hull design - shapes, materials, coatings,
propulsion, etc. - going in the near - and not so near - future?


That's like asking Ferrari what they will be doing aerodynamically on their
next Formula One car. Or asking Ford what the next Focus will look like.
Good luck, though ;-)

Steve
Stephen C. Baker - Yacht Designer
http://members.aol.com/SailDesign/pr...cbweb/home.htm

Steve,

I dunno. Is it really going to be that radically different? There are
limits to weight loss, the multihull thing is where it is (would MORE
hulls make a diff? then drag) ... I know there is work being done on
hull coatings insofar as critter adhesion, but are there hull coatings
that will release surface tension like a dolphin's skin? ...is "skin"
an option? ...

I'm just wondering ... beyond foils (and even that ...can a hull BE a
foil? ..rather than having outrigger foils) ...

if Michaelangelo was designing hang gliders in the 15th century, I
figured some of you guys who actually know this stuff must have SOME
ideas for what "could" be ... given material strengths, etc. ... Can a
boat be a disc ...can disc plane, can it float.. ya-dah, ya-dah,
ya-dah ...

Just going for discussion ..

Gary

gjoyce November 11th 03 12:42 AM

Where is hull design going?
 
"Chris" wrote in message om...
"gjoyce" wrote in message
m...
I figured this erudite group could point me in the correct direction.
I've been
cruising thru a variety of naval research sites, but was wondering
what you
designer-types might think.

Where do you see hull design - shapes, materials, coatings,
propulsion, etc. - going in the near - and not so near - future?


Thanks

Gary P. Joyce


Well, I think they'll be working alot more IR/Radar-defeating surfaces into
construction, stealth technologies, crew-automation...

I see afew multihulls on the design table, lots of efforts to reduce
ship/crew size, increase efficiency, defenses seem to be focusing towards
anti-missile lately. If you'll notice, alot more design-process proposals
are coming out for smaller naval vessels, with less focus on the larger
carrier vessels. The Aircraft Carrier of today doesn't look much different
than it did in WW2-era. Not so for the destroyer or frigate of today's
Navy.


Yeah, I've noticed that reading what lit is available...the military
is definitely looking at B-2 -looking boats to defeat radar ... they
also seem pretty serious about coatings to prevent critters, but I'm
wondering if - recreationally - what could/would/might trickle down.

Seems most of the work is being done in the submarine context ... the
Russians have this battleship-like design that works surface and sub
.... wild ... but they don;t have the cash anymore ...

I was reading something about hull technology and the guy said that
there is so little capitalization in the rec market, and so little
"real" R&D being done, that to expect anything coming out of the rec
market was pointless ...

then there is the reluctance of "hard core" boaters to change anything
(witness the resistance to multihulls in the sail community, and the
resistance to cats by the power community)...

I was just thinking that maybe some of y'all out there had some ideas
.... God know I won't laugh, 'cause anything you can describe is
waaaaay beyond anything I know anything about ...

just ruminating ...started surfing ... thought the topic was
intriguing ...

Gary

Brian D November 11th 03 03:26 AM

Where is hull design going?
 
I don't know ...the chief weakness in existing do-it-yourself boats is the
apparent lack of the bikini-attraction force. It's probably some kind of
static charge thing that draws polyester swimsuits closer, but have you
noticed that fiberglass speed boats tend to attract the most bikinis?
Whenever a bikini gets close, it sticks right to the boat with such strength
that the gal wearing the bikini is stuck flat on her back for hours. We've
got to figure this out and fix home-builts so they work better ...maybe wood
is a bikini repellent? I know aluminum is ...same with forward-slanting
windshields...

Brian

--
My boat project: http://www.advantagecomposites.com/tongass


"Chris" wrote in message
m...

"gjoyce" wrote in message
m...
I figured this erudite group could point me in the correct direction.
I've been
cruising thru a variety of naval research sites, but was wondering
what you
designer-types might think.

Where do you see hull design - shapes, materials, coatings,
propulsion, etc. - going in the near - and not so near - future?


Thanks

Gary P. Joyce


Well, I think they'll be working alot more IR/Radar-defeating surfaces

into
construction, stealth technologies, crew-automation...

I see afew multihulls on the design table, lots of efforts to reduce
ship/crew size, increase efficiency, defenses seem to be focusing towards
anti-missile lately. If you'll notice, alot more design-process proposals
are coming out for smaller naval vessels, with less focus on the larger
carrier vessels. The Aircraft Carrier of today doesn't look much

different
than it did in WW2-era. Not so for the destroyer or frigate of today's
Navy.






gjoyce November 12th 03 12:52 AM

Where is hull design going?
 
"Brian D" wrote in message news:jFYrb.165150$HS4.1341475@attbi_s01...
I don't know ...the chief weakness in existing do-it-yourself boats is the
apparent lack of the bikini-attraction force. It's probably some kind of
static charge thing that draws polyester swimsuits closer, but have you
noticed that fiberglass speed boats tend to attract the most bikinis?
Whenever a bikini gets close, it sticks right to the boat with such strength
that the gal wearing the bikini is stuck flat on her back for hours. We've
got to figure this out and fix home-builts so they work better ...maybe wood
is a bikini repellent? I know aluminum is ...same with forward-slanting
windshields...

Brian


Brian,
Do like that boat ... that's some jon you're doing, given the space problem!

gary


--
My boat project: http://www.advantagecomposites.com/tongass


"Chris" wrote in message
m...

"gjoyce" wrote in message
m...
I figured this erudite group could point me in the correct direction.
I've been
cruising thru a variety of naval research sites, but was wondering
what you
designer-types might think.

Where do you see hull design - shapes, materials, coatings,
propulsion, etc. - going in the near - and not so near - future?


Thanks

Gary P. Joyce


Well, I think they'll be working alot more IR/Radar-defeating surfaces

into
construction, stealth technologies, crew-automation...

I see afew multihulls on the design table, lots of efforts to reduce
ship/crew size, increase efficiency, defenses seem to be focusing towards
anti-missile lately. If you'll notice, alot more design-process proposals
are coming out for smaller naval vessels, with less focus on the larger
carrier vessels. The Aircraft Carrier of today doesn't look much

different
than it did in WW2-era. Not so for the destroyer or frigate of today's
Navy.




Brian D November 12th 03 02:30 AM

Where is hull design going?
 
According to AutoCAD, the boat fits as long as I stop building after the
V-berth goes in. At that point, I need to move the boat to a shelter or
larger shop. A buddy of mine has some barns on his grass farm. Another guy
has a large shop that could accommodate 2 or 3 boats like this. Both have
said I could use them ...but I'd rather avoid it if I can. Might build a
bow-roof shelter next to Garage #3. I have 14' between structure and fence
line there, and can go 40' deep if I need to (only need 28' plus or minus).
I find that figuring out the finer details as you go works best ..."Just do
it!" (but with just a little forethought so you know if there will be a
solution to the various challenges along the way.)

Brian

--
My boat project: http://www.advantagecomposites.com/tongass


"gjoyce" wrote in message
m...
"Brian D" wrote in message

news:jFYrb.165150$HS4.1341475@attbi_s01...
[snip]

Brian,
Do like that boat ... that's some job you're doing, given the space

problem!

gary


--
My boat project: http://www.advantagecomposites.com/tongass


"Chris" wrote in message
m...

"gjoyce" wrote in message
m...
I figured this erudite group could point me in the correct

direction.
I've been
cruising thru a variety of naval research sites, but was wondering
what you
designer-types might think.

Where do you see hull design - shapes, materials, coatings,
propulsion, etc. - going in the near - and not so near - future?


Thanks

Gary P. Joyce

Well, I think they'll be working alot more IR/Radar-defeating surfaces

into
construction, stealth technologies, crew-automation...

I see afew multihulls on the design table, lots of efforts to reduce
ship/crew size, increase efficiency, defenses seem to be focusing

towards
anti-missile lately. If you'll notice, alot more design-process

proposals
are coming out for smaller naval vessels, with less focus on the

larger
carrier vessels. The Aircraft Carrier of today doesn't look much

different
than it did in WW2-era. Not so for the destroyer or frigate of

today's
Navy.






William R. Watt November 12th 03 02:20 PM

Where is hull design going?
 
"Brian D" ) writes:
According to AutoCAD,...


I find that figuring out the finer details as you go works best ..."Just do
it!" (but with just a little forethought so you know if there will be a
solution to the various challenges along the way.)


I've been trying to work out all the details for a 15 ft plywood sailboat
with a cabin on paper as an exercise. I don't plan to build the boat. It's
frustrating. I was able to make a cardboard model no problem. I have a
clear image of the boat in my imagination. Getting it on paper is a
challenge. Both the cardboard model and the paper plan are abstractions
from a desired reality but the model seems less abstract. I've done some
thinking on mathematical and other abstractions over the years. The best
ones have the simplest set of essential information.

--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
William R Watt National Capital FreeNet Ottawa's free community network
homepage: www.ncf.ca/~ag384/top.htm
warning: non-freenet email must have "notspam" in subject or it's returned

Old Nick November 12th 03 10:23 PM

Where is hull design going?
 
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 02:30:59 GMT, "Brian D"
wrote something
.......and in reply I say!:

A buddy of mine has some barns on his grass farm.

????????????

************************************************** ****************************************
Until I do the other one,this one means nothing
Nick White --- HEAD:Hertz Music

remove ns from my header address to reply via email

!!
")
_/ )
( )
_//- \__/


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com