Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brian says:
I've seen tanks made the way you suggested, but with the tank top oversize so it extended an additional inch-plus on either side. This was for suspending the tank by the lip. With all the pounding that a boat goes through, I feel concern that the top weldment would be prone to fatigue and cracking. OTOH, I do know lots of people do it this way (1/8" sides/bottom, 3/16" top). What do you think? I'm not exactly fond of that method. As you say, too risky. If you want to hang something make up a bracket properly sized, and then all you have to replace is the bracket if it fails. THat's the same reason why my stereo system is component rather than "boom-box" style. I don't have to replace everything coz the turntable dies (yes, I'm that old ;-)) I love things that work, and can be depended on. That includes gravity. If gravity will hold something in place when static, then a simple strap to take care of the dynamic situation is all you need. And it's cheap! Steve |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Steve, or an aluminum expert: In general bends are better than welds (in aluminum) since you don't have the heat treatment hardening of the tank in the area of bends, but do in the area of welds. What if the aforementioned lips on the side, the sides, and bottom, were all made from one sheet that was bent to make the shape. The end caps would be welded on, as would the lid, but the welded-on lid would not be carrying the weight. Is there any issue with bends becoming weak? Brian "Stephen Baker" wrote in message ... Brian says: I've seen tanks made the way you suggested, but with the tank top oversize so it extended an additional inch-plus on either side. This was for suspending the tank by the lip. With all the pounding that a boat goes through, I feel concern that the top weldment would be prone to fatigue and cracking. OTOH, I do know lots of people do it this way (1/8" sides/bottom, 3/16" top). What do you think? I'm not exactly fond of that method. As you say, too risky. If you want to hang something make up a bracket properly sized, and then all you have to replace is the bracket if it fails. THat's the same reason why my stereo system is component rather than "boom-box" style. I don't have to replace everything coz the turntable dies (yes, I'm that old ;-)) I love things that work, and can be depended on. That includes gravity. If gravity will hold something in place when static, then a simple strap to take care of the dynamic situation is all you need. And it's cheap! Steve |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
My theory is that the least amount of welding the better. It weakens
the material much less and is a whole lot less expensive. Brian D wrote: Steve, or an aluminum expert: In general bends are better than welds (in aluminum) since you don't have the heat treatment hardening of the tank in the area of bends, but do in the area of welds. What if the aforementioned lips on the side, the sides, and bottom, were all made from one sheet that was bent to make the shape. The end caps would be welded on, as would the lid, but the welded-on lid would not be carrying the weight. Is there any issue with bends becoming weak? Brian "Stephen Baker" wrote in message ... Brian says: I've seen tanks made the way you suggested, but with the tank top oversize so it extended an additional inch-plus on either side. This was for suspending the tank by the lip. With all the pounding that a boat goes through, I feel concern that the top weldment would be prone to fatigue and cracking. OTOH, I do know lots of people do it this way (1/8" sides/bottom, 3/16" top). What do you think? I'm not exactly fond of that method. As you say, too risky. If you want to hang something make up a bracket properly sized, and then all you have to replace is the bracket if it fails. THat's the same reason why my stereo system is component rather than "boom-box" style. I don't have to replace everything coz the turntable dies (yes, I'm that old ;-)) I love things that work, and can be depended on. That includes gravity. If gravity will hold something in place when static, then a simple strap to take care of the dynamic situation is all you need. And it's cheap! Steve -- Glenn Ashmore I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack there of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com Shameless Commercial Division: http://www.spade-anchor-us.com |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brian says:
Is there any issue with bends becoming weak? No, there is an issue with bends BEING weak. ;-) Take a sheet of aluminum, bend it 90 degrees, then bend it straight. Now try to rip it. See what I mean? Welding will lose you a lot of strength, yes, but it is a well-documented loss, and folks will generally use only strength figures for the welded condition. If you use bent plate, and calculate for the un-welded strength, you _will_ suffer for it. Steve "not an aluminum expert...." |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I must disagree. Especially with non-heat treatable alloys like 5052
and 5086 used in marine applications. These alloys are work hardened. You are confusing bent strength with fatigue cracking. If you bend any metal back and forth it will crack but if you bend aluminum once it gets stronger. Aluminum can be bent and stretched more than almost any metal. A beer can starts of as a flat disk. Aluminum sheet usually comes hardened to some degree. The hardness comes primarily from the rolling process. The amount is indicated by the H number that follows the alloy number. For example H0 is anealed, the softest and weakest. H1 is hardened only. H2 is hardened and partially anealed. H3 is hardened and then stabalized. The second number is the amount of hardening and the third number defines hardnes a little colser. H116 is between 1/8 and 1/4 hard only. H34 is half hard and stabalized. When you bend them the hardness and therefore the strenght goes up slightly. When you weld any of them they drop back to the anealed H0 condition and are up to 20% weaker. Also if the weld is not done exactly right or it is a little windy when it is done blowing the shield gas away you run the risk of hydrogen enbrittlement which results in cracking. Stephen Baker wrote: Brian says: Is there any issue with bends becoming weak? No, there is an issue with bends BEING weak. ;-) Take a sheet of aluminum, bend it 90 degrees, then bend it straight. Now try to rip it. See what I mean? Welding will lose you a lot of strength, yes, but it is a well-documented loss, and folks will generally use only strength figures for the welded condition. If you use bent plate, and calculate for the un-welded strength, you _will_ suffer for it. Steve "not an aluminum expert...." -- Glenn Ashmore I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack there of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com Shameless Commercial Division: http://www.spade-anchor-us.com |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
So, the bending may be OK after all...but if the lips for hanging the tank
are bent, then a lid is welded in, the weld will run right along the bend that makes the lip. Probably not so good again. There must be *some* way to make an aluminum tank that can be suspended by stringers. I want the top of the tank to be 3/16" so that together with the welded in baffles, it'll make a stiff deck to walk on. I know lots of people who've built the boat that I'm building have used tanks like these, but they let them 'hang by the lid weldment'. The biggest tank that I know of like this is about 8 feet long and contains 80 gallons of fuel, or about 60 pounds per foot ...30 pounds per weldment, pounding in the waves. Is that OK or are these guys driving around with a failure waiting to happen? Brian -- My boat project: http://www.advantagecomposites.com/tongass "Glenn Ashmore" wrote in message news:h83kb.79220$sp2.58042@lakeread04... I must disagree. Especially with non-heat treatable alloys like 5052 and 5086 used in marine applications. These alloys are work hardened. You are confusing bent strength with fatigue cracking. If you bend any metal back and forth it will crack but if you bend aluminum once it gets stronger. Aluminum can be bent and stretched more than almost any metal. A beer can starts of as a flat disk. Aluminum sheet usually comes hardened to some degree. The hardness comes primarily from the rolling process. The amount is indicated by the H number that follows the alloy number. For example H0 is anealed, the softest and weakest. H1 is hardened only. H2 is hardened and partially anealed. H3 is hardened and then stabalized. The second number is the amount of hardening and the third number defines hardnes a little colser. H116 is between 1/8 and 1/4 hard only. H34 is half hard and stabalized. When you bend them the hardness and therefore the strenght goes up slightly. When you weld any of them they drop back to the anealed H0 condition and are up to 20% weaker. Also if the weld is not done exactly right or it is a little windy when it is done blowing the shield gas away you run the risk of hydrogen enbrittlement which results in cracking. Stephen Baker wrote: Brian says: Is there any issue with bends becoming weak? No, there is an issue with bends BEING weak. ;-) Take a sheet of aluminum, bend it 90 degrees, then bend it straight. Now try to rip it. See what I mean? Welding will lose you a lot of strength, yes, but it is a well-documented loss, and folks will generally use only strength figures for the welded condition. If you use bent plate, and calculate for the un-welded strength, you _will_ suffer for it. Steve "not an aluminum expert...." -- Glenn Ashmore I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack there of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com Shameless Commercial Division: http://www.spade-anchor-us.com |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Now here I agree with Steven that tanks should be supported from below.
While the static load per inch may be low the dynamic cycling from pounding through the waves can cause stress corrosion and cracking in the weld. A thicker top could actually make it worse. Think about what happens when 500 pounds of diesel bounces. The bottom of the tank flexes pulling the sides together. The flange therefore pulls against the weld. The top goes into compression and because metals are stronger in compression than tension it deflects less so the weld has to bend. Being the weakest point it will bend the most. Also having lost any resistance to stress corrosion during the welding it will corrode faster. If you are hanging the tank a better solution would be to at least add angle irons across the bottom every couple of feet to reduce flexing and possibly up the sides to mounting points on the stringers to take the load off the weld. Brian D wrote: So, the bending may be OK after all...but if the lips for hanging the tank are bent, then a lid is welded in, the weld will run right along the bend that makes the lip. Probably not so good again. There must be *some* way to make an aluminum tank that can be suspended by stringers. I want the top of the tank to be 3/16" so that together with the welded in baffles, it'll make a stiff deck to walk on. I know lots of people who've built the boat that I'm building have used tanks like these, but they let them 'hang by the lid weldment'. The biggest tank that I know of like this is about 8 feet long and contains 80 gallons of fuel, or about 60 pounds per foot ...30 pounds per weldment, pounding in the waves. Is that OK or are these guys driving around with a failure waiting to happen? Brian -- Glenn Ashmore I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack there of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com Shameless Commercial Division: http://www.spade-anchor-us.com |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've never felt comfortable about hanging the tank. I'd use poly, but I can
get more volume with a custom aluminum tank. I'll support the tank, either by shelves that run along the sides of the tank (extending beneath the tank to carry it from below of course) or will put an on-edge stringer under the tank. Either way, will use neoprene between the support and the tank. The tank will be etched, primered, and epoxy painted to prevent external corrosion and I'll lift the tank out every 5 years or so for an inspection. I'll maintain the "use the top as a deck" concept and will place enough baffles in the tank, welded to the top, and use a 3/16" top too, to make sure it is a stiff deck. Might be a gas fumes sensor in the tank area since the drain plug from that chamber will lead into a fish box, which means it'll be closed until the boat's back on a trailer. Thanks, Brian -- My boat project: http://www.advantagecomposites.com/tongass "Glenn Ashmore" wrote in message news:%79kb.79853$sp2.33451@lakeread04... Now here I agree with Steven that tanks should be supported from below. While the static load per inch may be low the dynamic cycling from pounding through the waves can cause stress corrosion and cracking in the weld. A thicker top could actually make it worse. Think about what happens when 500 pounds of diesel bounces. The bottom of the tank flexes pulling the sides together. The flange therefore pulls against the weld. The top goes into compression and because metals are stronger in compression than tension it deflects less so the weld has to bend. Being the weakest point it will bend the most. Also having lost any resistance to stress corrosion during the welding it will corrode faster. If you are hanging the tank a better solution would be to at least add angle irons across the bottom every couple of feet to reduce flexing and possibly up the sides to mounting points on the stringers to take the load off the weld. Brian D wrote: So, the bending may be OK after all...but if the lips for hanging the tank are bent, then a lid is welded in, the weld will run right along the bend that makes the lip. Probably not so good again. There must be *some* way to make an aluminum tank that can be suspended by stringers. I want the top of the tank to be 3/16" so that together with the welded in baffles, it'll make a stiff deck to walk on. I know lots of people who've built the boat that I'm building have used tanks like these, but they let them 'hang by the lid weldment'. The biggest tank that I know of like this is about 8 feet long and contains 80 gallons of fuel, or about 60 pounds per foot ...30 pounds per weldment, pounding in the waves. Is that OK or are these guys driving around with a failure waiting to happen? Brian -- Glenn Ashmore I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack there of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com Shameless Commercial Division: http://www.spade-anchor-us.com |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
We have a local guy here that teaches welding at the college and he's a
persnickety perfectionist and very very knowlegible about all types of welding. I know another guy up in Homer, Alaska that is also extremely top-notch and an excellent welder. I'll do my homework with both these guys on the tank design, and then will spec it out. I'm hoping the local college guy will weld it up for me ...he's such a perfectionist, not just with the welding but all the structural issues. His students pass the certifications at very near the 100% level, one of the highest rates of successful certifications in the country. I don't know if he's willing to do custom work but I sure hope so. I just want to get all the answers I can before I go chase him down. Having the tank suspended by the longitudinals means free open air under the tank and prevents corrosion. I guess I could put a support stringer under the tank and weld on a sacrificial strip of aluminum that'll rest on it. Something like 1/4" thick...take a few lifetimes to corrode that away, assuming you seal-weld the edges and don't trap water between it and the tank via capillary action. Education is ongoing ...I'll keep looking into this stuff. And I *do* own the full set of ABYC and USCG specs ...need to go read the fuel tank stuff too. Dave Gerr has a couple of articles, a 2 part series, in the current Professional Boatbuilder and the last one (Number 84 and 85, August/September issue and October/November issue, 2003). Brian -- My boat project: http://www.advantagecomposites.com/tongass "Stephen Baker" wrote in message ... Brian says: Is there any issue with bends becoming weak? No, there is an issue with bends BEING weak. ;-) Take a sheet of aluminum, bend it 90 degrees, then bend it straight. Now try to rip it. See what I mean? Welding will lose you a lot of strength, yes, but it is a well-documented loss, and folks will generally use only strength figures for the welded condition. If you use bent plate, and calculate for the un-welded strength, you _will_ suffer for it. Steve "not an aluminum expert...." |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brian,
Something a tank builder in RI suggested to me was mounting the tank on something like UHMW material attached to the tank with 5200. That way no water can get between the mounting device (UHMW pad) and the Al tank. That would take care of keeping the tank from going any lower (gravity again) and I guess straps across the top, but there you go again with a water entrapment problem. Maybe more UHMW pads and a strap over them? I'm leaning more and more toward a plastic tank, looking for a small one but it has to fit under the cockpit and behind the mizzen step of o my Kenner Privateer 26, a bit over 10 gals would keep me quite happy. And I found out just the other day that Todd no longer makes the small tanks, apparently only larger ones. Do the makers (Tempo and who else) put baffles inside these plastic tanks? Dave Cannell -- In article %L4kb.805694$Ho3.219150@sccrnsc03, Brian D wrote: We have a local guy here that teaches welding at the college and he's a persnickety perfectionist and very very knowlegible about all types of welding. I know another guy up in Homer, Alaska that is also extremely top-notch and an excellent welder. I'll do my homework with both these guys on the tank design, and then will spec it out. I'm hoping the local college guy will weld it up for me ...he's such a perfectionist, not just with the welding but all the structural issues. His students pass the certifications at very near the 100% level, one of the highest rates of successful certifications in the country. I don't know if he's willing to do custom work but I sure hope so. I just want to get all the answers I can before I go chase him down. Having the tank suspended by the longitudinals means free open air under the tank and prevents corrosion. I guess I could put a support stringer under the tank and weld on a sacrificial strip of aluminum that'll rest on it. Something like 1/4" thick...take a few lifetimes to corrode that away, assuming you seal-weld the edges and don't trap water between it and the tank via capillary action. Education is ongoing ...I'll keep looking into this stuff. And I *do* own the full set of ABYC and USCG specs ...need to go read the fuel tank stuff too. Dave Gerr has a couple of articles, a 2 part series, in the current Professional Boatbuilder and the last one (Number 84 and 85, August/September issue and October/November issue, 2003). Brian |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
fuel tank cleaning | General | |||
Fuel tank dual pickups | General | |||
97 sea ray sundancer fuel tank? | General | |||
Diesel Fuel Decontamination Units Give Stored Fuel Longer Life. | General | |||
Fuel Tank Clog....Please help!! | General |