Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() steveb wrote: http://www.tek-tanks.com/ Would probably be my choice. Tek-Tank will make welded HDPE water and holding tanks but their line of fuel tanks is very limited. Fuel tanks have to be cross linked polyethylene and you can't weld XLPE. It has to be rotomolded so you are stuck with the tooling cost. -- Glenn Ashmore I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack there of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com Shameless Commercial Division: http://www.spade-anchor-us.com |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() boatdreams wrote: Guys, Dave Gerr (Elements of Boat Strength, pg.186) and others have written volumes about 5000 vs. 6000 series aluminum alloys. They all recommend 5000 series for marine applications, but caution that it's NOT taboo to substitute 6000 series for use other than hull plate--including non-intregal fuel tanks. 6000 series can be used but with limitations. First it does not weld anything like as well as 5052 or 5086 and second it is much more susceptible to corrosion than the 5000 series. Welded aluminum sounds horribly weak from the drift of this discussion. Nobody has said welded aluminum is "horribly weak" but it will loose about 20% of its strength in the area of the weld which has to be taken into consideration when designing the structure. I guess that's why aluminum tankers supply the fuel to our local gas stations? Think about it. That tanker you passed on the freeway this morning held 5000 gallons of gasoline enclosed inside an aluminum skin--0.180" sides/top and 0.220" belly--and it bridged 30' kingpin to center of axles. The girth weld, 15' from the nearest bearing support is a simple butt joint and was probably hand mig welded by a kid who didn't finish high school. Only about 20% of those shiny tankers are aluminum. Most are stainless. Aluminum tankers must meet DOT406-AL standards. They have a longitudinal structure, either chassis rails and cross members or internal webbing to prevent excess flexing of the tank. They are also built with 5000 series material. The design is fairly standardized and carefully refined and that kid that welded it has 2 or 3 years of training, uses a $5K TIG welder and lays the same bead 8 hours a day 5 days a week. The guy I am working with can hardly write his name but he lays a beautiful full penetration bead. :-) Forget the semi trailer, the 50 gallon round or rectangular saddle tanks hung off brackets bolted outboard from the truck chassis were most likely welded aluminum and at 0.161" to 0.250" plate thickness--thicker than they need to be--for added protection against puncture. And they are hung--suspended by fabricated straps and/or U-brackets. So please don't malign welded aluminum tanks. They've been the fuel tank of choice for 50 years where light weight, low maintenance and cost effectiveness are appreciated. It is very hard to compare automotive tanks to marine tanks. While automotive tanks have to deal with vibration they don't get the constant cyclical loading of marine tanks. They also don't have to contend with a constant exposure to a highly corrosive environment. Again, nothing wrong with aluminum tanks but they are not the ideal tank for all situations. They do weigh between 20% and 50% less than mild steel but they are more than twice as expensive. They are also more susceptible to stress cracking than mild steel. Removing weight from consideration I would rank the material for diesel tanks under about 40 gallons like this: #1 Mild steel #2 5086 aluminum #3 5052 aluminum #4 Cross linked polyethylene (XLPE) #5 stainless steel (either 304 or 316) #6 FRP. Over 40 gallons XLPE drops to fifth place because of the difficulty in adding baffles and the limited selection of stock shapes. Now, before Lew gets to upset, ;-) because fiberglass can be molded on site to the required space it is the most efficient for the use of volume but it is almost impossible to keep diesel from permeating site fabricated FRP. (duck'n and run'n) :-) -- Glenn Ashmore I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack there of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com Shameless Commercial Division: http://www.spade-anchor-us.com |
#33
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Glenn Ashmore wrote in message news:Gytkb.80009$sp2.24474@lakeread04...
steveb wrote: http://www.tek-tanks.com/ Would probably be my choice. Tek-Tank will make welded HDPE water and holding tanks but their line of fuel tanks is very limited. Fuel tanks have to be cross linked polyethylene and you can't weld XLPE. It has to be rotomolded so you are stuck with the tooling cost. I know this will not solve your problem, but on the twenty footer I will be building, I planned areas such as fuel storage areas to use common size readily available marine fuel tanks. Easily replaceable in any marine store. I don't need to carry as much as you, but I have two 6 gallon tanks (mains) in the rear of the boat, with a third stored in the bow. I can just plug them in as I need them. Just thought I would note that to anyone else is in my situation and watching this thread. Scotty |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sorry if this is off topic.
A few NOTs from someone with 15 years hands-on experience building welded tanks--aluminum, steel and stainless: First it {6061) does not weld anything like as well as 5052 or 5086 NOT. Welders don't even notice when they're moving from 5000 to 6000 unless one or the other is extrusion instead of plate. They're apt to wire brush the extrusion a little more whichever alloy it is. They don't change gas or rod/wire and don't even adjust their current if the thickness and position are similar. second it is much more susceptible to corrosion than the 5000 series. NOT. 5083 and 5054 create a slight electrical potential and with 6061 you have slightly more. Don't use it in direct contact with salt water. Bill Gates could afford to specify 5083 throughout a boat, but even he could not guarantee that every piece of alloy on his boat is exactly what he specified and probably paid for. Only about 20% of those shiny tankers are aluminum. Most are stainless. NOT. ALL the shiny tankers you see dropping off fuel at the gas station are aluminum. They have a longitudinal structure, either chassis rails and cross members or internal webbing to prevent excess flexing of the tank. NOT. Truck tanks like semis and pull trailers are supported front and back on bearing pads or short subframes. There is no longitudinal stiffening other than the shell, rings, baffles and bulkheads that form a structural tube. By excess flexing, you probably mean 'failure'. Any aluminum semi tanker driver will tell you his 5000 gallon balloon flexes with a period equal to the period of his suspension...And the first 50 years he drove the damn thing it scared the hell out of him. The design is fairly standardized and carefully refined NOT. There are off-the-shelf tanks and off-the-shelf boats. Every time the customer buys a new tanker he recalculates the proportions of regular, midrange and premium or diesel--always moving the baffles, bulkheads and piping and often demaning a custom tube shape. Kind of sounds like boaters. Everyone wants a 40' boat, but there are a lot of interpretations of what goes in a 40' boat. kand that kid that welded it has 2 or 3 years of training, NOT. He completed a 60-day welding course at the county ROP training site and the rest of his training was on-the-job training working with a lead welder, definitely doing his share of weld-offs on the girth seams of the semi-tankers we're talking about. uses a $5K TIG welder and lays the same bead 8 hours a day 5 days a week. NOT. All welded aluminum production tankers are mig welded. Period. And nobody in a tank fabrication shop welds off every day. Your aluminum hull might be a 90-day building project followed by 5 days of weldoff. Tanker fabrication has a similar ratio of building : welding. The guy I am working with can hardly write his name but he lays a beautiful full penetration bead. :-) NOT. One pass full penetration in butt welds is a myth. Your guy does it the same way everybody else does. 1st he tacks it all together. 2nd he runs a solid weld around the inside of the seam. 3rd he runs a portable skill saw around the outside of the seam to remove contamination and increase penetration. 4th the welds off the outside. It is very hard to compare automotive tanks to marine tanks. While automotive tanks have to deal with vibration they don't get the constant cyclical loading of marine tanks. They also don't have to contend with a constant exposure to a highly corrosive environment. NOT. The Principle of Uniformitarianism assures us that the mathematics, physics and chemistry on the 3rd rock from the Sun is the same as on the 3rd rock from Polaris or anywhere else. Granted, the period of waves is going to be different from the period of any given set of trailer springs. The bending moments will differ. The number and placement of anodes will differ. But we're talking about different numbers, not different sciences. Cheers, Boat Dreams |
#35
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Brian Whatcott wrote: On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 12:39:43 -0700, w kensit wrote: In a sailboat, maximizing tank size is going to result in an irregular shape with the fuel pick up at the deepest point. A sump is an unnecessary embelishment. Water is going to be of concern only with contaminated supply in a well designed system. If water in the fuel causes sleepless nights tee into the fuel pump discharge so a liter or so can be pumped into a container for disposal. Disagree. Tanks that are less than completely full condense water during thermal cycles, and water being heavier than gas or diesel, it collects at the low point. This really ought to be a small sump, need not be more than a tea cup - where it can be checked via a sampler. Nothing stops an engine better than water in the fuel. Brian Whatcott Altus OK Which all the more reason to end the season with full tanks. The only time I experienced problems was from a load of contaminated fuel in mid summer. My point is that unless your tank has a large flat bottom you are in fact adding a sump to a sump. |
#36
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brian Whatcott wrote in message . ..
On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 12:39:43 -0700, w kensit wrote: .... Nothing stops an engine better than water in the fuel. Other than me putting a wrench on it! ![]() |
#37
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brian,
Something a tank builder in RI suggested to me was mounting the tank on something like UHMW material attached to the tank with 5200. That way no water can get between the mounting device (UHMW pad) and the Al tank. That would take care of keeping the tank from going any lower (gravity again) and I guess straps across the top, but there you go again with a water entrapment problem. Maybe more UHMW pads and a strap over them? I'm leaning more and more toward a plastic tank, looking for a small one but it has to fit under the cockpit and behind the mizzen step of o my Kenner Privateer 26, a bit over 10 gals would keep me quite happy. And I found out just the other day that Todd no longer makes the small tanks, apparently only larger ones. Do the makers (Tempo and who else) put baffles inside these plastic tanks? Dave Cannell -- In article %L4kb.805694$Ho3.219150@sccrnsc03, Brian D wrote: We have a local guy here that teaches welding at the college and he's a persnickety perfectionist and very very knowlegible about all types of welding. I know another guy up in Homer, Alaska that is also extremely top-notch and an excellent welder. I'll do my homework with both these guys on the tank design, and then will spec it out. I'm hoping the local college guy will weld it up for me ...he's such a perfectionist, not just with the welding but all the structural issues. His students pass the certifications at very near the 100% level, one of the highest rates of successful certifications in the country. I don't know if he's willing to do custom work but I sure hope so. I just want to get all the answers I can before I go chase him down. Having the tank suspended by the longitudinals means free open air under the tank and prevents corrosion. I guess I could put a support stringer under the tank and weld on a sacrificial strip of aluminum that'll rest on it. Something like 1/4" thick...take a few lifetimes to corrode that away, assuming you seal-weld the edges and don't trap water between it and the tank via capillary action. Education is ongoing ...I'll keep looking into this stuff. And I *do* own the full set of ABYC and USCG specs ...need to go read the fuel tank stuff too. Dave Gerr has a couple of articles, a 2 part series, in the current Professional Boatbuilder and the last one (Number 84 and 85, August/September issue and October/November issue, 2003). Brian |
#38
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey! Now we're talking. I can use SikaFlex 291 to put UHMW (thin) on the
bottom of the hull or whatever support stringers I put in (removable), then use 3M 5200 to put UHMW strips on the bottom of the tank (permanent). No water can gather between the tank and the support materials, nor between the support materials and the epoxy/glass/wood either, and the UHMW will prevent chafing forever... Thanks for the inspiration ...I think I have a solution: custom tank, and artful use of UHMW and supports! Brian "Dave Cannell" wrote in message .. . Brian, Something a tank builder in RI suggested to me was mounting the tank on something like UHMW material attached to the tank with 5200. That way no water can get between the mounting device (UHMW pad) and the Al tank. That would take care of keeping the tank from going any lower (gravity again) and I guess straps across the top, but there you go again with a water entrapment problem. Maybe more UHMW pads and a strap over them? I'm leaning more and more toward a plastic tank, looking for a small one but it has to fit under the cockpit and behind the mizzen step of o my Kenner Privateer 26, a bit over 10 gals would keep me quite happy. And I found out just the other day that Todd no longer makes the small tanks, apparently only larger ones. Do the makers (Tempo and who else) put baffles inside these plastic tanks? Dave Cannell -- In article %L4kb.805694$Ho3.219150@sccrnsc03, Brian D wrote: We have a local guy here that teaches welding at the college and he's a persnickety perfectionist and very very knowlegible about all types of welding. I know another guy up in Homer, Alaska that is also extremely top-notch and an excellent welder. I'll do my homework with both these guys on the tank design, and then will spec it out. I'm hoping the local college guy will weld it up for me ...he's such a perfectionist, not just with the welding but all the structural issues. His students pass the certifications at very near the 100% level, one of the highest rates of successful certifications in the country. I don't know if he's willing to do custom work but I sure hope so. I just want to get all the answers I can before I go chase him down. Having the tank suspended by the longitudinals means free open air under the tank and prevents corrosion. I guess I could put a support stringer under the tank and weld on a sacrificial strip of aluminum that'll rest on it. Something like 1/4" thick...take a few lifetimes to corrode that away, assuming you seal-weld the edges and don't trap water between it and the tank via capillary action. Education is ongoing ...I'll keep looking into this stuff. And I *do* own the full set of ABYC and USCG specs ...need to go read the fuel tank stuff too. Dave Gerr has a couple of articles, a 2 part series, in the current Professional Boatbuilder and the last one (Number 84 and 85, August/September issue and October/November issue, 2003). Brian |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
fuel tank cleaning | General | |||
Fuel tank dual pickups | General | |||
97 sea ray sundancer fuel tank? | General | |||
Diesel Fuel Decontamination Units Give Stored Fuel Longer Life. | General | |||
Fuel Tank Clog....Please help!! | General |