Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"P.C. Ford" wrote in message
... On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 07:07:49 -0400, "Ed Edelenbos" wrote: Whadya want? Names and adresses so you can go check? The statement "Unless the part is reinforced with carefully aligned glass fiber it will not be up to the task." is a stupid statement to make. What task? I know repairs that are 25 years old which are still up to the task... They are in various places where it is crucial and the repairs hold up even under the harshest weather and water conditions. I still say the statement is rediculous. Sheesh... boatwright? Do you ever take those boats out? Do you have any experience on the water? Why yes I do. On sail and power. Do you have any experience restoring boats? Why yes I do. Both sail and power. Woodworking and fiberglass. Using hand tools and power tools. If you count my dads boats that were the first I worked on, it has been over 40 years. Do I get a prize or something? You have swallowed boatshow handout propaganda whole. That's "stupid" and "rediculous".....to use your words. Ok... explain how I have done so. I haven't been to a boatshow in over 15 years. I'm talking real boats and real repairs. On Chesapeake Bay work boats, no less. Boats that go out at least 300 days a year. To say that a given repair method (especially the one being discussed) is "not up to the task" is utter bull****. It implies that a given method is not suited for any task. Do you believe this? Who is being rediculous? It ain't me. Ed |