| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Don...again I agree with your philosophical support for Per the
visionary...but the fact is that ...no...he has not suggested a "method". He has only suggested a form...and he doesn't know how it can be made or of what it can be made. It is quite possible that someone in the 14th century thought "Wouldn't it be cool if buildings could have 100 floors!" That isn't architecture and I would never suggest that such a comment was the idea for the tall buildings of the 20th century. Those were the work of architects who solved the technical and artistic problems involved in making such forms. I agree with you that I like Per...but don't give him credit for what he hasn't done. Christopher "Don" one-if-by-land.concord.com wrote in message ... "Syd Mead" wrote in message news:QbAeb.9058$Rd4.3063@fed1read07... GS/Don quote: "Edison tried over 1000 materials...." How many has Per tried? Even at and economical scale? You're talking apples and oranges. Per is suggesting a *method*, not a material. |