| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
That's correct. On both the right and left sides (inside) you can see the
original plywood near the top of the boat. Almost looks like they didn't finish the job. "Mac" wrote in message news ![]() On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 21:44:06 -0700, Evan Gatehouse wrote: [I wrote] Thanks for chiming in! It's always nice to have people who actually know what they are talking about. So, to come back to the OP's question, if a transom is originally constructed with fiberglass skins and a plywood core, and some of the plywood is rotten, would it be OK to replace the rotten parts with several pieces of plywood butted together? Or would it be better to scarf in one piece of plywood to replace the rotten area? I guess another way of asking the question is, would butt joints in the plywood core significantly weaken the transom? I am thinking that they would not weaken the transom. --Mac If they are relying on the core for stiffness and strength, then butt joints would be weaker. I wouldn't do it on my boat for example. I would cut off the outer skin near the transom corners, chisel and then grind out all the plywood and rebuild the transom Evan Gatehouse Thanks. From elsewhere in the thread, it sounds like the OP is going to get serious about the job and replace just about all the plywood in the transom. Also, the OP mentioned somewhere else that there is almost no fiberglass on the inside of the transom near the top. This leads me to believe that it is essentially a plywood transom which uses overlapped glass as a means to attach the transom to the hull. This is a lot different than, say, a cored deck. --Mac |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Fiberglass vs plastic | General | |||
| Bought a Reinel 26' | ASA | |||
| rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
| NEW Boat Profit Margins | General | |||
| Repost from Merc group | General | |||