Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() The difference will be mostly in the complication of building. As for performance there could be a bit of additional drag due to increased wetted surface. It depends on how wide the dory bottom is. Fishing dories had very narrow bottoms which made them quite tender. It would make no difference to have a "V" bottom. "Batteau" dories were more like barges with wide bottoms and low sides. What makes a boat a dory is basically the way a large board is bent 'round a middle form on a flat bottom. Raking the sides out is what gives the bottom rocker. The side boards are usually shaved down at the lower ends to reduce the rocker. The computer program you are using calculates wetted surface. It can also do the (hydrostatic) calculations for different angles of heel but one assumes a rowboat is not heeled as that makes rowing uncomfortable. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ William R Watt National Capital FreeNet Ottawa's free community network homepage: www.ncf.ca/~ag384/top.htm warning: non-FreeNet email must have "notspam" in subject or it's returned |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Hull Design & Displacement Hulls | General | |||
The future of yacht design - 10 myths scotched | ASA | |||
Hull structural grids | ASA | |||
car top hull issues | Touring | |||
Hull speed theory? | Boat Building |