On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 05:16:13 GMT, Dan Best
wrote:

A common misconception. If you think about it, you will realize that
the radio energy of flowing off of and being received along the entire
width of the antenna which is much wider than your mast. A healthy
percentage of it is reflected back and to the sides, but most of the
energy just flows right on past the mast. It works the same in reverse
for the reflected energy coming back from a target. Thus, the strength
of the reteurn is reduced, but you are still able to see it. Othereise,
all those boats with mast mounted radars would have a fairly wide cone
to their rear where they pick up nothing.

OK, so it's a function of radome width and radar wavelength then. Is
it fair to say that there is a weaker area of coverage dead ahead and
dead astern, then? The masts must absorb SOME of the signal.

I am thinking that a "watch strategy" for using radar under
unfavourable conditions might be to alter course five degrees or so
every three miles (depending on radar range) or so to confirm the
absence of traffic in such "weak spots", if they exist.

My experience in this is limited (obviously), but many years ago I did
use directional antennas for base-station CB radio of all things and
noticed how signal strengths would fluctuate at various points. I
figure radar is similar.

R.