Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'll bite ... my mercruiser thermostat is 140 F ... lower than an automotive
thermostat ... the manifolds/risers/exhaust are water cooled ... much cooler than an auto exhaust ... water pressures are no greater than in an auto engine ... I would use automotive cooling lines on the fresh water side. Salt water side ... no comment. "Edward Greeley" wrote in message ... Gentlemen (and ladies if you have any comments): Does anyone know of any "real world" reasons why automotive-type, corrugated flexible hoses should not be used to replace unavailable or ridiculously expensive OEM molded hoses in marine engine cooling applications, i.e.: A. On the fresh water (antifreeze) side of a heat exchanger cooled engine? B. On the sea water (salt water) side of the same cooling system? Please, folks, I'm asking for VALID reasons why the automotive hoses should NOT be used, not non-specific comments like: "Well, the XYZ company must have had SOME reason for not using those hoses." Your comments, advice, or experience with this will be appreciated! Thank you, Ed Greeley |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Anchoring engine hoses | Boat Building | |||
power vs sail | Cruising | |||
Evinrude FICHT beats out Yamaha in JD Powers survey | General | |||
Engine News from Genmar | General | |||
Usage of motoroil | General |