Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Morgan Ohlson
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 20:20:53 +0700, Egis/CORE wrote:

On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 11:20:44 GMT, Morgan Ohlson
wrote:

On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 07:13:04 +0700, Egis/CORE wrote:

On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 16:58:02 GMT, Morgan Ohlson
wrote:

On 23 Oct 2004 16:01:42 GMT, Stephen Baker wrote:

you know little.

I don't like people to give faulty advice anyhow. I just liked to give a
hint to PeterM.A about that.

..but I will not fall to your standards of attacking...

...explained this way...

If you have a rig in solid concrete, which would matter the most to the rig?
A) wind speed?
B) the momentum of the solid concrete?

take care... hope you understand something new now!



Morgan O.

You are absolutely right. If the rig were mounted in concrete the
important force would result from wind velocity and sail area.

However -- we are discussing a rig installed on a BOAT and the
important force is righting moment.

i.e., in the case you are discussing the mast is fixed and therefore
the effective area of the sail is constant. In the case of a spar
mounted on a movable base, i.e., a boat, the spar moves and therefore
the effective area of the sail changes with changes in wind velocity,
thus the important figure is the force opposing the spar movement, the
righting moment.

Most people who have any knowledge of boats understand this fact
instinctively.


1'st... I undertand exactly what you are saying...

But tech /nature doesn't stop there. There is more to it. Especially that
part comes into account in this case, a 2 hull vessell.

You are stuck in what sometimes goes under the label "psychic prisons".


Morgan O.



Sorry old buddy but whether the boat has one hull or many the
calculation is the same since the force is the same - the force
necessary to heel the vessel, or to phrase it another way, the force
the vessel exerts in attempting to stay upright. the Righting Moment,
in other words.


Perhaps ordinary engineering isn't good enough for boat historians.

Think...
Inert mass
Roll resistans
Non capsizeing vessells
Heavy ghusts

....and you get quite different scenarios.

It's quite alright to use old rules of thumb... but know their limits!


Morgan O.
  #2   Report Post  
Stephen Baker
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Morgan O says:

Non capsizeing vessells


No such thing ;-)

Some boats will always right themselves, but there is NO boat that is
"non-capsizing".

Steve
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
tyvek (long) William R. Watt Boat Building 2 June 30th 04 05:09 AM
Bwahaha! Bye Bye Bushy! Bobsprit ASA 1 June 18th 04 10:37 PM
Mast Rake and Mast Bend DSK ASA 48 January 16th 04 08:07 PM
Red over green mast light for sailboat Lee Huddleston Boat Building 4 September 15th 03 04:57 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017