"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:09:39 -0700, "Capt. JG"
said:

Is that early voting done by going to a polling place and casting a
vote,
or
is it like the Dems' proposed abolition of union elections, where
Cornelius
the Acorn volunteer can come round to the nursing home and "help" the
voter
fill out the ballot and make sure it gets delivered?


No, it's more like this...
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/...in649380.shtml

I seem to have missed the part about early voting in that article, Jon.


Try and keep up. We're talking about supposed registration fraud by acorn
vs. voter fraud by some republicans.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:48:46 -0700, "Capt. JG"
said:

Try and keep up. We're talking about supposed registration fraud by acorn
vs. voter fraud by some republicans.

Correction: you were talking about registration fraud by Acorn until I
raised a separate question about the potential for early voting to be the
subject of similar fraud. You responded to my question with a pointer to
some web site having nothing to do with early voting. I take it that's a
subject you don't want to talk about. That's ok. But I do wish that if you
have nothing to add that's responsive to the question you'd simply refrain
from responding to the question.


Not my fault if you're having trouble keeping up.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 20:14:01 -0500, Dave wrote:

On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:48:46 -0700, "Capt. JG"
said:

Try and keep up. We're talking about supposed registration fraud by
acorn vs. voter fraud by some republicans.

Correction: you were talking about registration fraud by Acorn until I
raised a separate question about the potential for early voting to be
the subject of similar fraud. You responded to my question with a
pointer to some web site having nothing to do with early voting. I take
it that's a subject you don't want to talk about. That's ok. But I do
wish that if you have nothing to add that's responsive to the question
you'd simply refrain from responding to the question.

C'mon Dave. You know the best defense when you don't have one is to
change the subject. That tactic, and vulgarities are the #1 and #2 ways
libs get their points across.

On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 22:21:45 -0500, Ken Marino
wrote:

On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 20:14:01 -0500, Dave wrote:

On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:48:46 -0700, "Capt. JG"
said:

Try and keep up. We're talking about supposed registration fraud by
acorn vs. voter fraud by some republicans.

Correction: you were talking about registration fraud by Acorn until I
raised a separate question about the potential for early voting to be
the subject of similar fraud. You responded to my question with a
pointer to some web site having nothing to do with early voting. I take
it that's a subject you don't want to talk about. That's ok. But I do
wish that if you have nothing to add that's responsive to the question
you'd simply refrain from responding to the question.

C'mon Dave. You know the best defense when you don't have one is to
change the subject. That tactic, and vulgarities are the #1 and #2 ways
libs get their points across.

Are you serious? Dave has a custom made pair of gloves he uses to hold
the goal posts as he runs around with them.

On 29 Oct 2008 20:14:01 -0500, Dave wrote:

But I do wish that if you
have nothing to add that's responsive to the question you'd simply refrain
from responding to the question.

I take it from this advice to Jon, that you are announcing that you
have taken a vow to never post here again, for the same reason.