Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#16
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
But they *did* have skin in the game. The same as you or I... keep
paying or lose your home. Frank Boettcher wrote: No, I had to put 20% down on my last home as a requirement to avoid PMI and to get the payment to something I could afford. *They essentially had the same situation as a renter. Nothing substantial down, If you can't do it, just walk away, nothing lost except I got to move. I remember buying my first home. *1971, 24 years old, college graduate with a first entry level professional job, good work record, no debt, good credit, proof of savings for down payment and closing costs, I was trying to borrow $18,000 and the PITI would be $123/month. *I was making $700/month and was in the Marine Corp reserve making another $30 or so. *Mortgage was to be an VA/FHA combo, available to reservists. * I was turned down. *Builder (who was also my landlord and friend of the family) drove me 180 miles to Jackson to have an appeal interview with the FHA people to try to get me in the house. *After the interview they approved the loan. How did we get from that to where you could get a "liars loan" from a street corner loan originator, where you don't even have to show proof of income, assets, credit worthiness or anything to get a loan. Root cause my friend, simple as that. Frank Sorry, but it just plain isn't. You seem to be insisting that the "root cause" is that poor people who could not ordinarily qualify for a mortgage were flooding into the housing market, because the gov't was forcing banks to offer them loans that they could then shrug off. And you're saying this is because of a law passed by Congress in the 1970s. Long time comin' huh? Well, I just can't see this as a smoking gun. 1st- the rate of default, as a percent, has not gone up all that much... less than a 10% increase overall IIRC 2nd- even if you take a dim view of poor people getting mortgages, and insist they would take a mortgage no more seriously than they would paying rent, it's hard to fathom why they would go to the trouble... it's time consuming and complicated to apply for a mortgage. Did they do it just to **** off us whiteys? 3rd- Mortgage defaults have hit the middle- and upper-middle class as hard as the lower income brackets, especially people who did cash-out refinances, people who bought upgrade houses & second (or third) homes. Many defaults are due to adjusted ARMs or balloon payments coming due, and the homeowner's conclusion that they're better off walking away from a seriously upside-down property. 4th- banks were certainly not forced to offer 125% financing, home- equity lines of credit, zero-down & interest-only mortgages, and all the other nifty ways to live beyond one's means that sustained consumer spending thru the past ten years. 5th- investment banks & hedge funds were not forced by the gov't to over-leverage these new mortgage-bundle-based investments on the goggle-eyed assumptions that real estate values had no ceiling (especially after "warning shot" crash in California). FWIW I bought a house with VA assisted finacning too. What a pain... I'll never do that again. Our VA seems to be one of those bureaucracies that spends all it's time & effort telling you why you can't have what they're obliged to givo you... other parts of the country seem to have a better bunch in office. Regards- Doug King |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Is it true... | General | |||
It's True, It's True | ASA | |||
Ain't it true! | ASA | |||
True "true wind" & the Raymarine ST60, or other | Electronics |