"Vito" wrote in message
...
"Steve" wrote
"Gregory Hall" wrote:

Doing it right would have entailed doing what we did in the first
month....
It's refreshing to know there's more than me out here who think we're
wimps....

I'm all for killing the terrorists who attacked us both at home and
overseas but Saddam was NOT one of them. Just the opposite. He may have
disagreed with us on Israel but he was one of the biggest secular bulwarks
against our real enemy, radical Islam, in the middle east. Al qaeda even
had a price on his head.

If Bush had been president when the Japs hit Pearl Harbor he no doubt
would have diverted military and intel assets away from Japan and invaded
Russia or Austrailia instead. The Iraq war makes almost as much sense.

One writer suggested that we could "win" in Iraq by cutting off the bad
guys supplies of weapons and ammo just like we did to Germany. Good
plan - except that we were forced to hand them enough stuff to fight
indefinately because Blundering Bush didn't give the military enough
manpower to secure Saddam's ammo dumps let alone keep museums and all from
being looted. That's where all the IEDs came from.



Saddam Hussein was a terrorist - end of argument. You lose!

Your problem, like most rabid Bush haters, is you confuse even yourself with
all your extraneous bull**** liberal talking points.

Now run along you little chicken ****. That yellow streak up your back
bothers my eyes.

--
Gregory Hall

On 17-May-2008, "Gregory Hall" wrote:

Saddam Hussein was a terrorist - end of argument.

Possible, but irrelevant - it took Mr. Hussein to keep the savages in check.
The U.S. "fixed" that by mandating a "democracy" that put Shiite savages in
charge.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha ha