http://online.wsj.com/public/article... main_tff_top

Military now considering awarding purple hearts for psychological disorders.
My how the mighty have fallen!

--
Gregory Hall

"Gregory Hall" wrote in message
...
http://online.wsj.com/public/article... main_tff_top

Military now considering awarding purple hearts for psychological
disorders. My how the mighty have fallen!

--
Gregory Hall


Or, "Johnny comes whining and sniveling home again, hooray, hoorah!" I
agree, that's so disgraceful giving credence to anybody who acts like some
psycho nut case. Hey, if you can't take the heat stay out of the kitchen.
Nobody made you join the military.

Wilbur Hubbard

On Tue, 13 May 2008 19:33:54 -0400, "Gregory Hall"
wrote this crap:

http://online.wsj.com/public/article... main_tff_top

Military now considering awarding purple hearts for psychological disorders.
My how the mighty have fallen!


No mighty warriors should allow this.




I'm Horvath and I approve of this post.

On Tue, 13 May 2008 19:33:54 -0400, "Gregory Hall"
wrote this crap:

http://online.wsj.com/public/article... main_tff_top

Military now considering awarding purple hearts for psychological disorders.
My how the mighty have fallen!


No mighty warriors should allow this.





I'm Horvath and I approve of this post.

On 13-May-2008, "Gregory Hall" wrote:

Military now considering awarding purple hearts for psychological
disorders.
My how the mighty have fallen!

That's what happens when civilian bed wetters run a war rather than
warriors. The U.S. is playing meal-on-wheels to the enemy while suffering
the attacks of savages. Rebuild that ********??????? The United States won
the war in 3 1/2 weeks - attempting to make them civilized is asinine.

Back out all the troops, dispose of munitions by launching them from the
border, and let them sort themselves out. The height of stupidity is
"bringing democracy to the middle east" when it exists nowhere else on Earth
except in prisons and the bushes of Africa. They have a democracy in Iraq
(by ludicrous "American" standards) meaning they can elect their own dirt
bags. Like in the U.S. The U.S. doesn't like the dirt bags that were
elected. Hhahahahahahahaha - same in "Palestine" and Lebanon.

Worse is coming.

"Steve" wrote in message
...

On 13-May-2008, "Gregory Hall" wrote:

Military now considering awarding purple hearts for psychological
disorders.
My how the mighty have fallen!

That's what happens when civilian bed wetters run a war rather than
warriors. The U.S. is playing meal-on-wheels to the enemy while suffering
the attacks of savages. Rebuild that ********??????? The United States
won
the war in 3 1/2 weeks - attempting to make them civilized is asinine.

Back out all the troops, dispose of munitions by launching them from the
border, and let them sort themselves out. The height of stupidity is
"bringing democracy to the middle east" when it exists nowhere else on
Earth
except in prisons and the bushes of Africa. They have a democracy in Iraq
(by ludicrous "American" standards) meaning they can elect their own dirt
bags. Like in the U.S. The U.S. doesn't like the dirt bags that were
elected. Hhahahahahahahaha - same in "Palestine" and Lebanon.

Worse is coming.

Can't argue with your logic. If it's worth doing, it's worth doing right is
a truism. The Iraq war was definitely worth doing and had the wholehearted
sanction of the U.S. Congress. Even all but one or two Democrats were on the
bandwagon. Where we fell short was in the doing it right. PC reared it's
ugly head.

Doing it right would have entailed doing what we did in the first month.
Then we should have withdrawn completely along the borders and secured them.
Then we should have let the disparate factions duke it out. If we didn't
like the outcome we should have then bombed the winners out of existence and
then let them have at it again until some semblance of a civilized and
secure winner emerged. Then and only then we go back in and set up a
permanent military base paid for with Iraqi oil along with cheap oil in the
future until all military spending on the war was reimbursed.

That's the way a man would have handled it. Wimps did it the way we saw it
done.

--
Gregory Hall

On 16-May-2008, "Gregory Hall" wrote:

Doing it right would have entailed doing what we did in the first month.
Then we should have withdrawn completely along the borders and secured
them.
Then we should have let the disparate factions duke it out. If we didn't
like the outcome we should have then bombed the winners out of existence
and
then let them have at it again until some semblance of a civilized and
secure winner emerged. Then and only then we go back in and set up a
permanent military base paid for with Iraqi oil along with cheap oil in
the
future until all military spending on the war was reimbursed.

That's the way a man would have handled it. Wimps did it the way we saw it

done.

It's refreshing to know there's more than me out here who think we're wimps.
If you listen to the bed wetters, "Bush is a Nazi" which is just the
opposite to the truth. The PC baloney is why the U.S. is history. Where's
Truman or MacArthur when we need them. (actually I said that exact same
thing on Sept. 11.

"Vito" wrote in message
...
"Steve" wrote
"Gregory Hall" wrote:

Doing it right would have entailed doing what we did in the first
month....
It's refreshing to know there's more than me out here who think we're
wimps....

I'm all for killing the terrorists who attacked us both at home and
overseas but Saddam was NOT one of them. Just the opposite. He may have
disagreed with us on Israel but he was one of the biggest secular bulwarks
against our real enemy, radical Islam, in the middle east. Al qaeda even
had a price on his head.

If Bush had been president when the Japs hit Pearl Harbor he no doubt
would have diverted military and intel assets away from Japan and invaded
Russia or Austrailia instead. The Iraq war makes almost as much sense.

One writer suggested that we could "win" in Iraq by cutting off the bad
guys supplies of weapons and ammo just like we did to Germany. Good
plan - except that we were forced to hand them enough stuff to fight
indefinately because Blundering Bush didn't give the military enough
manpower to secure Saddam's ammo dumps let alone keep museums and all from
being looted. That's where all the IEDs came from.



Saddam Hussein was a terrorist - end of argument. You lose!

Your problem, like most rabid Bush haters, is you confuse even yourself with
all your extraneous bull**** liberal talking points.

Now run along you little chicken ****. That yellow streak up your back
bothers my eyes.

--
Gregory Hall

On 17-May-2008, "Gregory Hall" wrote:

Saddam Hussein was a terrorist - end of argument.

Possible, but irrelevant - it took Mr. Hussein to keep the savages in check.
The U.S. "fixed" that by mandating a "democracy" that put Shiite savages in
charge.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha ha

"Vito" wrote in message
...
"Gregory Hall" wrote
Saddam Hussein was a terrorist - end of argument. You lose!

Bull ****! Saddam only supported terrorism in Israel - not my problem.

Your problem, like most rabid Bush haters,

Your problem is that you are a blind sycophant, blind to truth.

Now run along you little chicken ****. That yellow streak up your back
bothers my eyes.

Greg, if you met me you'd **** your pants.


Probably. Chicks with dicks tend to turn my stomach!

--
Gregory Hall