Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
I decided
I too did extensive research on the MacGregor 26M
and to my amazement discovered hundreds of very happy sailors. Some have sailed the boat from Nova Scotia al the way to Abacos. See Silver Donald Cameron's book It may not be the perfect sailboat.. nor the perfect motorboat. But for the person who wishes to do both at a reasonable price,, it does the job. |
#2
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
I decided
"John W. Bienko" wrote in message
... I too did extensive research on the MacGregor 26M and to my amazement discovered hundreds of very happy sailors. Some have sailed the boat from Nova Scotia al the way to Abacos. See Silver Donald Cameron's book It may not be the perfect sailboat.. nor the perfect motorboat. But for the person who wishes to do both at a reasonable price,, it does the job. Just because you have a bunch of happy owners, does not a good sailboat make. Most people don't understand what distinguishes a good one from a so-so one. M26s are a lousy compromise between sail and power. Just about any boat can be sailed offshore. Doesn't mean you should. Sure, there are some conditions under which an M26 will perform fine. There are limits to all makes/models. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#3
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
I decided
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 10:19:26 -0700, "Capt. JG"
wrote: "John W. Bienko" wrote in message ... I too did extensive research on the MacGregor 26M and to my amazement discovered hundreds of very happy sailors. Some have sailed the boat from Nova Scotia al the way to Abacos. See Silver Donald Cameron's book It may not be the perfect sailboat.. nor the perfect motorboat. But for the person who wishes to do both at a reasonable price,, it does the job. Just because you have a bunch of happy owners, does not a good sailboat make. Most people don't understand what distinguishes a good one from a so-so one. Never saw a poster on the Mac forum who thought Macs are good sailers. But they are sailed. There is one guy who leaves his mast at home and does short cruises with his wife, 3 kids and a dog. They've been having a real good time for years, gunkholing. M26s are a lousy compromise between sail and power. You don't understand Macs. The attraction of them has very little to do with sailing. It has more to do with owning a fairly large boat with shallow draft that can be trailered, motored at least twice as fast as sallboat, and sleep/shelter a bunch of people at a very low price. After all that it can move under sail. Some owners are former sailors and they tweak the sailing aspect, but they didn't buy the boat because it sails well. There is no compromise. It is what it is because it sells to a target market. It's on my 2-boat short list of boats when I move to Florida, so I can give my thoughts as part of the target market. The other I'm considering is a 24' Carolina skiff. Why? 1. It's cheap brand new. 2. It can motor at good economy when throttled back. 3. It's good for gunkholing and can be beached. 4. It's roomy for its length, mechanically simple, and needs no thruhulls. The above applies to both boats. The skiff is a better fishing boat, and the Mac a better overnighter. The skiff is faster and more maneuverable, the Mac more seaworthy. The Mac can travel under sail when fuel hits $10.00 a gallon. It's all pretty simple. Doesn't have much to do with sailing or romantic notions of the sea. If I never intended to hoist a sail, I would still consider the Mac for my purposes, none of which is offshore sailing. Just about any boat can be sailed offshore. Doesn't mean you should. Sure, there are some conditions under which an M26 will perform fine. There are limits to all makes/models. Once all is made watertight, the limits of the man at the helm are more important. --Vic |
#4
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
I decided
"Vic Smith" wrote in message
... On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 10:19:26 -0700, "Capt. JG" wrote: "John W. Bienko" wrote in message ... I too did extensive research on the MacGregor 26M and to my amazement discovered hundreds of very happy sailors. Some have sailed the boat from Nova Scotia al the way to Abacos. See Silver Donald Cameron's book It may not be the perfect sailboat.. nor the perfect motorboat. But for the person who wishes to do both at a reasonable price,, it does the job. Just because you have a bunch of happy owners, does not a good sailboat make. Most people don't understand what distinguishes a good one from a so-so one. Never saw a poster on the Mac forum who thought Macs are good sailers. But they are sailed. There is one guy who leaves his mast at home and does short cruises with his wife, 3 kids and a dog. They've been having a real good time for years, gunkholing. M26s are a lousy compromise between sail and power. You don't understand Macs. The attraction of them has very little to do with sailing. It has more to do with owning a fairly large boat with shallow draft that can be trailered, motored at least twice as fast as sallboat, and sleep/shelter a bunch of people at a very low price. After all that it can move under sail. Some owners are former sailors and they tweak the sailing aspect, but they didn't buy the boat because it sails well. There is no compromise. It is what it is because it sells to a target market. It's on my 2-boat short list of boats when I move to Florida, so I can give my thoughts as part of the target market. The other I'm considering is a 24' Carolina skiff. Why? 1. It's cheap brand new. 2. It can motor at good economy when throttled back. 3. It's good for gunkholing and can be beached. 4. It's roomy for its length, mechanically simple, and needs no thruhulls. The above applies to both boats. The skiff is a better fishing boat, and the Mac a better overnighter. The skiff is faster and more maneuverable, the Mac more seaworthy. The Mac can travel under sail when fuel hits $10.00 a gallon. It's all pretty simple. Doesn't have much to do with sailing or romantic notions of the sea. If I never intended to hoist a sail, I would still consider the Mac for my purposes, none of which is offshore sailing. Just about any boat can be sailed offshore. Doesn't mean you should. Sure, there are some conditions under which an M26 will perform fine. There are limits to all makes/models. Once all is made watertight, the limits of the man at the helm are more important. --Vic Mostly, I agree, except for "Mac can travel under sail," and sailing Macs in the SF bay is probably not a good idea, at least not in the north bay in the summer. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#5
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
I decided
"Capt. JG" wrote in message news:a_ednQdiPrRdwJzVnZ2dnUVZ_jGdnZ2d@bayareasolut ions... The Mac can travel under sail when fuel hits $10.00 a gallon. It's all pretty simple. Doesn't have much to do with sailing or romantic notions of the sea. If I never intended to hoist a sail, I would still consider the Mac for my purposes, none of which is offshore sailing. Just about any boat can be sailed offshore. Doesn't mean you should. Sure, there are some conditions under which an M26 will perform fine. There are limits to all makes/models. Once all is made watertight, the limits of the man at the helm are more important. --Vic Mostly, I agree, except for "Mac can travel under sail," and sailing Macs in the SF bay is probably not a good idea, at least not in the north bay in the summer. Well, I would not enjoy trying to beat to windward in one, but I guess that is when the skipper of a Mac starts the motor. But with wind on or aft of the beam it would certainly sail and that might be the only kind of sailing certain families would want. Horses for courses... |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
I decided | ASA | |||
I decided | Cruising | |||
I have decided to become.......... | General | |||
Decided on Dry Tortugas | General |