LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats.cruising,alt.sailing.asa
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2007
Posts: 713
Default I decided

Capt. JG wrote:
"Marty" wrote in message
...
JimC wrote:
I'm not saying that there might not be such a report out there somewhere,
but so far no one on this ng has been able to produce it.

Your move.

I see no reports of flying pigs crashing to the ground, therefore pigs can
fly.

Are really that dense?

Cheers
Marty



Wait.. right there. You missed it!



Jon, there are four possibilities he

1) JimC is just playing devils advocate and is having fun being
deliberately obtuse.

2) JimC has a serious mental deficiency and actually believes a Mac26X
to be a fine sailing vessel suitable for competition in the TransPac.

3) JimC is in the employ of MacGregor, and or owns shares in the company.

4) Some combination of the above.

Cheers
Marty
  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats.cruising,alt.sailing.asa
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,757
Default I decided

"Marty" wrote in message
...
Capt. JG wrote:
"Marty" wrote in message
...
JimC wrote:
I'm not saying that there might not be such a report out there
somewhere, but so far no one on this ng has been able to produce it.

Your move.
I see no reports of flying pigs crashing to the ground, therefore pigs
can fly.

Are really that dense?

Cheers
Marty



Wait.. right there. You missed it!



Jon, there are four possibilities he

1) JimC is just playing devils advocate and is having fun being
deliberately obtuse.

2) JimC has a serious mental deficiency and actually believes a Mac26X to
be a fine sailing vessel suitable for competition in the TransPac.

3) JimC is in the employ of MacGregor, and or owns shares in the company.

4) Some combination of the above.

Cheers
Marty



I think there's a #5... Macs are, in fact, the most seaworthy boats that are
designed for the rigorous conditions one could encounter anywhere in the
vast oceans. Not only be unsinkable, even by fools such as us, they are
fast, look great, and are only sold to sailors who are the most deserving of
them - highly skilled seafarers of which there are few. The reason that we
believe they don't participate in competitions, such as the TransPac, is
because of the evil media, who are in cahoots with the other manufacturers.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com



  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats.cruising,alt.sailing.asa
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 834
Default I decided

Capt. JG wrote:


I think there's a #5... Macs are, in fact, the most seaworthy boats that are
designed for the rigorous conditions one could encounter anywhere in the
vast oceans. Not only be unsinkable, even by fools such as us, they are
fast, look great, and are only sold to sailors who are the most deserving of
them - highly skilled seafarers of which there are few. The reason that we
believe they don't participate in competitions, such as the TransPac, is
because of the evil media, who are in cahoots with the other manufacturers.


Thanks Jon, I hadn't considered that possibility. Damn sporting of those
Mac owners not to put us mere mortals to shame by thrashing us in such
races.

Cheers
Marty
  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats.cruising,alt.sailing.asa
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,757
Default I decided

"Martin Baxter" wrote in message
...
Capt. JG wrote:


I think there's a #5... Macs are, in fact, the most seaworthy boats that
are designed for the rigorous conditions one could encounter anywhere in
the vast oceans. Not only be unsinkable, even by fools such as us, they
are fast, look great, and are only sold to sailors who are the most
deserving of them - highly skilled seafarers of which there are few. The
reason that we believe they don't participate in competitions, such as
the TransPac, is because of the evil media, who are in cahoots with the
other manufacturers.


Thanks Jon, I hadn't considered that possibility. Damn sporting of those
Mac owners not to put us mere mortals to shame by thrashing us in such
races.

Cheers
Marty



They have our best interest in mind at all times.. especially when zooming
back to port in case there's wind a'comin.


--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com



  #5   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats.cruising,alt.sailing.asa
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 449
Default I decided



Capt. JG wrote:

"Marty" wrote in message
...

Capt. JG wrote:

"Marty" wrote in message
news:l8OdnbHUTe1kC4vVnZ2dnUVZ_uSdnZ2d@giganews. com...

JimC wrote:

I'm not saying that there might not be such a report out there
somewhere, but so far no one on this ng has been able to produce it.

Your move.

I see no reports of flying pigs crashing to the ground, therefore pigs
can fly.

Are really that dense?

Cheers
Marty


Wait.. right there. You missed it!



Jon, there are four possibilities he

1) JimC is just playing devils advocate and is having fun being
deliberately obtuse.

2) JimC has a serious mental deficiency and actually believes a Mac26X to
be a fine sailing vessel suitable for competition in the TransPac.

3) JimC is in the employ of MacGregor, and or owns shares in the company.

4) Some combination of the above.

Cheers
Marty




I think there's a #5... Macs are, in fact, the most seaworthy boats that are
designed for the rigorous conditions one could encounter anywhere in the
vast oceans. Not only be unsinkable, even by fools such as us, they are
fast, look great, and are only sold to sailors who are the most deserving of
them - highly skilled seafarers of which there are few. The reason that we
believe they don't participate in competitions, such as the TransPac, is
because of the evil media, who are in cahoots with the other manufacturers.



Ganz, you're obviously loosing it. Have you considered getting
professional help?

jim



  #6   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats.cruising,alt.sailing.asa
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,757
Default I decided

"JimC" wrote in message
...
Jon, there are four possibilities he

1) JimC is just playing devils advocate and is having fun being
deliberately obtuse.

2) JimC has a serious mental deficiency and actually believes a Mac26X to
be a fine sailing vessel suitable for competition in the TransPac.

3) JimC is in the employ of MacGregor, and or owns shares in the company.

4) Some combination of the above.

Cheers
Marty




I think there's a #5... Macs are, in fact, the most seaworthy boats that
are designed for the rigorous conditions one could encounter anywhere in
the vast oceans. Not only be unsinkable, even by fools such as us, they
are fast, look great, and are only sold to sailors who are the most
deserving of them - highly skilled seafarers of which there are few. The
reason that we believe they don't participate in competitions, such as
the TransPac, is because of the evil media, who are in cahoots with the
other manufacturers.



Ganz, you're obviously loosing it. Have you considered getting
professional help?

jim



You have no sense of humor... that's obvious. Are you really a twit or just
playing one?

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com



  #7   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats.cruising,alt.sailing.asa
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 449
Default I decided



Marty wrote:

Capt. JG wrote:

"Marty" wrote in message
...

JimC wrote:

I'm not saying that there might not be such a report out there
somewhere, but so far no one on this ng has been able to produce it.

Your move.

I see no reports of flying pigs crashing to the ground, therefore
pigs can fly.

Are really that dense?

Cheers
Marty




Wait.. right there. You missed it!



Jon, there are four possibilities he

1) JimC is just playing devils advocate and is having fun being
deliberately obtuse.

2) JimC has a serious mental deficiency and actually believes a Mac26X
to be a fine sailing vessel suitable for competition in the TransPac.

3) JimC is in the employ of MacGregor, and or owns shares in the company.

4) Some combination of the above.

Cheers
Marty


Actually, JimC is responding to every rational (or even arguably
rational) note posted by any and all Mac-Bashers on the newsgroup. -
Come one, come all, and I'll provide a response. (Except for those in
bad taste, and obviously sicko remarks such as those recently posted by
Ganz. - He's obviously loosing it.)

What JimC is NOT going to do is post responses to Mac-Bashers asking him
to defend positions that he doesn't hold, or statements he didn't make.

Jim
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I decided Wilbur Hubbard[_2_] Cruising 252 May 2nd 08 02:09 AM
I have decided to become.......... Thurston Howell III[_2_] General 1 December 19th 07 01:49 AM
Decided on Dry Tortugas Bob Cook General 0 August 11th 03 02:07 PM
Decided on Dry Tortugas Roy G. Biv General 5 August 5th 03 03:54 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017