Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 01 Apr 2008 12:07:05 -0400, Martin Baxter
wrote this crap: A sailing topic! How dare you? I'd question if the value of being able to do a quick head sail change is not in fact outweighed by the windage of the double foil, also I know it's not much but it does move some extra weight aloft. What windage of the foil? Racing boats use them, there is not much windage. In fact, using hanks probably is more inefficient. I'm Horvath and I approve of this post. |
#3
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bloody Horvath wrote:
On Tue, 01 Apr 2008 12:07:05 -0400, Martin Baxter wrote this crap: A sailing topic! How dare you? I'd question if the value of being able to do a quick head sail change is not in fact outweighed by the windage of the double foil, also I know it's not much but it does move some extra weight aloft. What windage of the foil? Racing boats use them, there is not much windage. In fact, using hanks probably is more inefficient. Indeed, a foil is probably better than hanks, but a double foil indubitably has more windage than a single foil. Cheers Marty |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Actual sailing content has arrived. | ASA | |||
First Sailing Topic For 2004 . . for me | ASA | |||
Actual Drawings of WMD | General |