"Joe" wrote in message
oups.com...
On May 3, 6:14 am, OzOne wrote:
On 2 May 2007 07:53:08 -0700, Joe scribbled
thusly:





On May 2, 6:01 am, thunder wrote:
On Tue, 01 May 2007 18:48:08 -0700, Joe wrote:
The dixie ****s can say WTF they want to here, but when that skanky
bitch bad mouthed the USA in another country she crossed the line.

The quote was, "Just so you know, we're ashamed the president of the
United States is from Texas." No where have the Dixie Chicks bad
mouthed
this country. In this country, there is a major difference between
bad
mouthing a President, and bad mouthing this country. If you don't
understand the difference, I suggest remedial civics.

Let me educate you about the Dixie ****s OZ...First I salute them,
they are talented, work hard, and a couple of them have real nice
asses. It good that they stand up for what they believe in. To bad
they hide themselfs inside walled compounds and have servants and yes
boys to comfort them.

Most Americans get up early, work hard all day. They do not have yes
men around them, and a horde of people catering to their every need.
Most Americans change the oil in thier cars, cook, clean, work hard
and take care of themselves.

The Dixie ****s are insulated prima donnas. They wouldn't know the
truth if it smacked them right between the eyes. If you do not kill
evil under the terms of righteous, freedom loving people like
American's then we will have to face evil in America (or OZland) on
evil's terms. That is not acceptable.

It ****es me off when these prima donnas deny the truth and live in
an insulated world of fnatasy and then criticize the very system by
which you can live free and brave.

The dixie sluts are just another in the pack of insulated spineless
cowards who think war is no good. Maybe someone should educate them
that instead of 60 million jews murdered in 1945 only 6 million were
killed. Why? Because war stopped the slaughter of innocence. War is
good when good survives and evil is defeated. If you do not crush
evil, then evil will win. If you do not stand up for good then that is
irresponsible and stupid. It's morally and intellectually bankrupt.

Joe

Jesus...no wonder they live in a compound!

Im sure they get out and spend time with friends in their compounds.
Friends like Alex Baldwin, Woody Allen, Jane Fonda, Al Sharpton, Ted
Kennedy, Micheal Moore, Rosie...ect. The whole pack of morally
bankrupt self centered douch bags.


Then they must hang out with all the right-wing nuts who've been scandalized
recently! That must be one heck of a party.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message
...

Max


hypocrite

No. I've never referred to anyone, let alone his wife,
as a "fat crack
whore."

I don't see you chastising Scotty for wishing me dead,
either.


Oh, Boo hoo hoo......

"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 03 May 2007 12:40:03 GMT, "Maxprop"
wrote:


"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 03 May 2007 02:11:58 GMT, "Maxprop"
wrote:


"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message
m...
On 2 May 2007 16:31:59 -0700, lid (Jonathan Ganz)
wrote:

In article ,
Scotty Same.as.above@com wrote:

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Scotty Same.as.above@com wrote:

"Charlie" missed the ''since he's dead'' part.

he misses a lot.

I know, but he's not dead.

Who, Charlie? Too bad.

Be nice....

Now I can respond anytime someone claims I wished death upon someone,
even
though I never did. That Scotty is an evil piece of ****. His wife is
a
fat
crack whore, but even she's more honorable than Scotty.

What a class act you are, BB.

Max


hypocrite

No. I've never referred to anyone, let alone his wife, as a "fat crack
whore."

I don't see you chastising Scotty for wishing me dead, either.

Hypocrite

There's a substantial difference between a tongue-in-cheek comment such as
"too bad" vs. calling someone's wife a "fat crack whore." Of course the
distinction will be lost on you.

Max

Joe wrote:
On May 3, 6:14 am, OzOne wrote:
On 2 May 2007 07:53:08 -0700, Joe scribbled
thusly:





On May 2, 6:01 am, thunder wrote:
On Tue, 01 May 2007 18:48:08 -0700, Joe wrote:
The dixie ****s can say WTF they want to here, but when that skanky
bitch bad mouthed the USA in another country she crossed the line.

The quote was, "Just so you know, we're ashamed the president of the
United States is from Texas." No where have the Dixie Chicks bad
mouthed
this country. In this country, there is a major difference between bad
mouthing a President, and bad mouthing this country. If you don't
understand the difference, I suggest remedial civics.

Let me educate you about the Dixie ****s OZ...First I salute them,
they are talented, work hard, and a couple of them have real nice
asses. It good that they stand up for what they believe in. To bad
they hide themselfs inside walled compounds and have servants and yes
boys to comfort them.

Most Americans get up early, work hard all day. They do not have yes
men around them, and a horde of people catering to their every need.
Most Americans change the oil in thier cars, cook, clean, work hard
and take care of themselves.

The Dixie ****s are insulated prima donnas. They wouldn't know the
truth if it smacked them right between the eyes. If you do not kill
evil under the terms of righteous, freedom loving people like
American's then we will have to face evil in America (or OZland) on
evil's terms. That is not acceptable.

It ****es me off when these prima donnas deny the truth and live in
an insulated world of fnatasy and then criticize the very system by
which you can live free and brave.

The dixie sluts are just another in the pack of insulated spineless
cowards who think war is no good. Maybe someone should educate them
that instead of 60 million jews murdered in 1945 only 6 million were
killed. Why? Because war stopped the slaughter of innocence. War is
good when good survives and evil is defeated. If you do not crush
evil, then evil will win. If you do not stand up for good then that is
irresponsible and stupid. It's morally and intellectually bankrupt.

Joe

Jesus...no wonder they live in a compound!

Im sure they get out and spend time with friends in their compounds.
Friends like Alex Baldwin, Woody Allen, Jane Fonda, Al Sharpton, Ted
Kennedy, Micheal Moore, Rosie...ect. The whole pack of morally
bankrupt self centered douch bags.

Is the crackerbox palace a compound OZ?

On his postings here, Oz would stand by while someone is being murdered in
front of him rather than intervene. Why are you surprised he'd rather see a
continuing series of Rwandas, Cambodias etc etc rather than have any outside
intervention?

The problem with you guys and intervention is, you're so bad at it. The
kicking arse phase when there's a formal military opposition, yep, you've got
that pat. The rest of it - no. Hopeless. So Oz has a point too. Stick to your
strengths - breaking stuff and bombing targets from on high, especially when
nobody can shoot back.

Said it before - assassination is a logical & reasonable response to the
modern asymetric warfare. Iran is feeding arms & support to your enemies but
at a level not worth going to war over? Target the command chain, not the mass
populace. That way the pain is inflicted on the decision makers not the
minions.

You guys will never do this of course, not from any moral qualms, but because
your collective leadership is too gutless to face the consequences if others
started down the same path. Pity as a targeted assassination plan of the US
leadership might improve the breed.

Places to go, people to annoy.....

PDW

OzOne wrote:
On Fri, 4 May 2007 02:26:10 +0200 (CEST), PDW
scribbled thusly:


On his postings here, Oz would stand by while someone is being murdered in
front of him rather than intervene.

WTF gives you even a hint of that?

Some of your prev postings, in the past. What's the diff Oz, one person, a
million people? Let me guess - the Stalin argument - one killing is a tragedy,
a million is a statistic? Should the USA et al let Hussein keep on gassing
Kurds or not? Just to pick one example. Not as I've said that I have much
faith in the USA's ability to deliver anything except destruction but
sometimes that's enough.

Seems you may be taking on the role of the gun totin lunatic who
actually believe that there is no solution but extreme violence.

1. To what? Are you stating that extreme violence is *never* a resort? In
which case my point is made - you *would* stand by watching a murder if the
only way of preventing it was an act of violence. You can't have it both ways,
Oz.

2. As a general principle - Wrong. It's the last resort IMO, but it is a valid
resort. I'm a very pacific person, last time I was in a brawl was back in
school, but if I or my family was seriously threatened and I had no other
resort, I *would* shoot the person(s). If that makes me a lunatic, ok, I can
live with that. I've stuck my nose into situations where a woman was being
abused verbally & physically a couple of times in recent years and found that
a cellphone was a very effective weapon, incidentally - my first resort was to
call the cops. That and the willingness to do something. Not that I've got any
thanks for it from the women involved but hey, if you *want* to get abused,
fine, just don't do it in my sight....

For your information, I have been armed and still managed to stop what
would have become a murder on more than one occasion without the need
to draw my weapon, and without the need to beat someone senseless.

When you were being paid for it, sure.....

No wonder you're not still a copper. If I ever end up in court having to
defend myself for shooting someone (very unlikely with my personality &
lifestyle), I intend to invoke the defence of *2* of your erstwhile NSW
colleagues, who shot & killed a man armed with a knife on Bondi beach, then
claimed that it was self defence. After all, if *2* police officers trained in
subduing people can't do anything except resort to firearms against a single
person armed with a knife, what hope has one semi-crippled, untrained person
got - other than reach for the shottie?

Fact is, Oz, whether you like it or not, whether you're stirring the septics
or believe what you're posting, you come across as someone who'd happily
ignore a murder if the alternative was acknowledging the right of a person
being attacked (or a bystander) to defend themselves, with a firearm if
necessary, by killing an assailant if necessary. If this isn't your position,
as we used to say in the Solomons - problem bilong you - it's the message that
comes across. And I'm serious.

I liked living in Tucson where there were a lot of people carrying guns and I
never had any probs, and I like living in Hobart where almost nobody carries
and there are no probs. People like me simply don't attract trouble. Sydney is
starting to worry me a little, because your erstwhile colleagues have lost the
plot, with a more than generous level of assistance from the political class.

PDW

OzOne wrote in message
...
On Fri, 4 May 2007 02:26:10 +0200 (CEST), PDW
scribbled thusly:


On his postings here, Oz would stand by while someone is
being murdered in
front of him rather than intervene.

WTF gives you even a hint of that?
Seems you may be taking on the role of the gun totin
lunatic who
actually believe that there is no solution but extreme
violence.

For your information, I have been armed and still managed
to stop what
would have become a murder on more than one occasion
without the need
to draw my weapon, and without the need to beat someone
senseless.


Wuss!

"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 3 May 2007 12:21:20 -0400, "Scotty"
wrote:


Oh, Boo hoo hoo......


If I was married to a woman, I'd be crying, too.

CWM

the crying game?