In article ,
Charlie Morgan wrote:
On 2 May 2007 11:04:03 -0700, Joe wrote:

On May 2, 12:36 pm, (Jonathan Ganz) wrote:
In article . com,

Joe wrote:

I'm ashamed of Bush. He's a discrace to the US.

Feel free to hate me too.

--
Capt. JG

I know, you love Chevas, Saddam, Amajahitler, AlQuieda, Ossama and
feel they are the true victims of the bush empire...I've heard you
Jon.

Joe

Victims, Joe? They aren't the victims. They are the BENEFICIARIES of
the Bush Empire.

I wouldn't call Saddam a beneficiary, since he's dead, but the
terrorists have certainly benefited from the current US
Administration's policies.

--
Capt. JG @@
www.sailnow.com

In article ,
Charlie Morgan wrote:
On 2 May 2007 11:45:22 -0700, lid (Jonathan Ganz)
wrote:
Victims, Joe? They aren't the victims. They are the BENEFICIARIES of
the Bush Empire.

I wouldn't call Saddam a beneficiary, since he's dead, but the
terrorists have certainly benefited from the current US
Administration's policies.

Saddam benefitted. He got lots of attention and now there are
multitudes who view him as a martyr, hoping to further his ideas.

Well, perhaps, but he wasn't the kind of guy in my view who really
cared about anything except his own skin.

--
Capt. JG @@
www.sailnow.com

In article ,
Dave wrote:
On Wed, 02 May 2007 14:49:24 -0400, Charlie Morgan said:

hoping to further his ideas

What are those ideas? Somehow I never thought Sadam much of a philosopher.

Neither did I. He was a not-so-petty tyrant.


--
Capt. JG @@
www.sailnow.com

"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message news

I wouldn't call Saddam a beneficiary, since he's dead,
but the
terrorists have certainly benefited from the current US
Administration's policies.

Saddam benefitted. He got lots of attention and now there
are
multitudes who view him as a martyr, hoping to further his
ideas.


"Charlie" missed the ''since he's dead'' part.

he misses a lot.

SV

In article ,
Scotty Same.as.above@com wrote:

"Charlie" missed the ''since he's dead'' part.

he misses a lot.

I know, but he's not dead.

--
Capt. JG @@
www.sailnow.com

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Scotty Same.as.above@com wrote:

"Charlie" missed the ''since he's dead'' part.

he misses a lot.

I know, but he's not dead.

Who, Charlie? Too bad.

SV

In article ,
Scotty Same.as.above@com wrote:

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Scotty Same.as.above@com wrote:

"Charlie" missed the ''since he's dead'' part.

he misses a lot.

I know, but he's not dead.

Who, Charlie? Too bad.

Be nice....


--
Capt. JG @@
www.sailnow.com

On May 2, 6:47 pm, BB wrote:


Now I can respond anytime someone claims I wished death upon someone, even
though I never did. '

CWM-


Yes you did BB.

Joe

OzOne wrote in message ...
On Wed, 02 May 2007 03:55:54 GMT, "Maxprop"
scribbled thusly:

Perhaps I should ask you the same question, Oz. I speak out against the
war
almost daily. So far no black helicopters have circled my office or home,
and no one from the Secret Service has shown up at my door. Even my
letter
opposing the war was printed in the local paper last month.

Max

You obviously have a low profile.
Try being an entertainer or a parent of a soldier.....

I'm just a citizen, and of course my voice, despite how loudly I yell, is
unheard.

Max

"Scotty" wrote in message
...

"Maxprop" wrote in message
link.net..
.



Perhaps I should ask you the same question, Oz. I speak
out against the war
almost daily. So far no black helicopters have circled my
office or home,
and no one from the Secret Service has shown up at my
door.

Have you looked under the bushes?

No. I just fire a couple thousand rounds of 7.62x39 into them daily to
insure that anything lurking there is of no concern. Problem is, the
foliage now looks just awful.

Max