"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
In article et,
Maxprop wrote:

OzOne wrote in message
. ..


Whoa?
What is it that puts a non citizen in a position where he is unable to
defend himself when you claim that right?

The US Constitution. It applies to citizens, not aliens.

Wrong. It applies to anyone under jurisdiction here.

The Constitution consistently refers to "the people," which all
Constitutional scholars agree was a term synonymous with "US citizens" as
intended by the founders.

Max

In article et,
Maxprop wrote:

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
In article et,
Maxprop wrote:

OzOne wrote in message
...


Whoa?
What is it that puts a non citizen in a position where he is unable to
defend himself when you claim that right?

The US Constitution. It applies to citizens, not aliens.

Wrong. It applies to anyone under jurisdiction here.

The Constitution consistently refers to "the people," which all
Constitutional scholars agree was a term synonymous with "US citizens" as
intended by the founders.

So, a legal resident, who is arrested is thrown in a gulag without the
rights afforded to a US citizen??? Sorry, but that's your fantasy.

--
Capt. JG @@
www.sailnow.com

So, a legal resident, who is arrested is thrown in a gulag without the
rights afforded to a US citizen??? Sorry, but that's your fantasy.

Wow you are really emotionally charged in your decision making aren't
you? You sound like a teenage girl on her period.

In article .com,
Bill wrote:
So, a legal resident, who is arrested is thrown in a gulag without the
rights afforded to a US citizen??? Sorry, but that's your fantasy.

Wow you are really emotionally charged in your decision making aren't
you? You sound like a teenage girl on her period.

Ah, the last resort of a nutcase unable to support his
case... personal insult.






--
Capt. JG @@
www.sailnow.com