On Apr 17, 1:05 pm, (Jonathan Ganz) wrote:
In article . com,

Joe wrote:
On Apr 17, 11:30 am, (Jonathan Ganz) wrote:

And, they have easy access to guns, especially handguns. If you remove
that easy access, then they might have a chance to get help before 33
people die needlessly. Why don't you tell us it's "in the
Constitution" again if it makes you feel better.

--
Capt. JG -Hide quoted text -

Wrong

Right.

--
Capt. JG

Brilliant Jon,
Care to offer any proof?

Joe

Jonathan Ganz wrote:
In article ,
katy wrote:

And, they have easy access to guns, especially handguns. If you remove
that easy access, then they might have a chance to get help before 33
people die needlessly. Why don't you tell us it's "in the
Constitution" again if it makes you feel better.



Why not start putting insane people back in the institutions where they
belong so they don't jeopardize the lives and welfare of others? Turns
out the guy was clincally diagnosed and was referred by the university
for counseling becasue his creative writing assignments were so
disturbing that the instructor was concerned. And it is the
Constitution, Jon...obviously the American people have not come to a
different conclusion about that or they'd make the quorum to change it...


Why not... good idea. Too bad Reagan didn't think so. Someone
clinically depressed certainly should be restricted from easy access
to guns. Hate to tell you, but the majority of Americans favor more
strick gun control...

Obviously, you don't have the facts...

Some polls:

http://www.pollingreport.com/guns.htm

http://archives.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLI...uns/index.html



If that were really so, then there would be legislation...after all, we
are goventment by the people for the people...if what you say was RALLY
true, then the people would rise up and do something about it...if a
person says they're against something, but does nothing to change it and
sits in apathy, then they are really not agaisnt it...they just like to
blat their mouths off with an opinion...I think the more valid statistic
would be that most Americans just don't give a crap...if they did,
they'd do something...

In article .com,
Joe wrote:
On Apr 17, 1:05 pm, (Jonathan Ganz) wrote:
In article . com,

Joe wrote:
On Apr 17, 11:30 am, (Jonathan Ganz) wrote:

And, they have easy access to guns, especially handguns. If you remove
that easy access, then they might have a chance to get help before 33
people die needlessly. Why don't you tell us it's "in the
Constitution" again if it makes you feel better.

--
Capt. JG -Hide quoted text -

Wrong

Right.

--
Capt. JG

Brilliant Jon,
Care to offer any proof?


The guy who killed 33 people because he had easy access to guns isn't
proof enough?


--
Capt. JG @@
www.sailnow.com

In article ,
katy wrote:
Why not... good idea. Too bad Reagan didn't think so. Someone
clinically depressed certainly should be restricted from easy access
to guns. Hate to tell you, but the majority of Americans favor more
strick gun control...

Obviously, you don't have the facts...

Some polls:

http://www.pollingreport.com/guns.htm

http://archives.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLI...uns/index.html



If that were really so, then there would be legislation...after all, we
are goventment by the people for the people...if what you say was RALLY
true, then the people would rise up and do something about it...if a
person says they're against something, but does nothing to change it and
sits in apathy, then they are really not agaisnt it...they just like to
blat their mouths off with an opinion...I think the more valid statistic
would be that most Americans just don't give a crap...if they did,
they'd do something...

I know you're a very innocent person, but do you dispute the polls? Do
you think the NRA is just going to lie down and let Congress regulate
their business without a fight? They pour millions into their hands
everytime a piece of legislation that would restrict their business
shows up.


--
Capt. JG @@
www.sailnow.com

On Apr 17, 1:41 pm, (Jonathan Ganz) wrote:
In article .com,





Joe wrote:
On Apr 17, 1:05 pm, (Jonathan Ganz) wrote:
In article . com,

Joe wrote:
On Apr 17, 11:30 am, (Jonathan Ganz) wrote:

And, they have easy access to guns, especially handguns. If you remove
that easy access, then they might have a chance to get help before 33
people die needlessly. Why don't you tell us it's "in the
Constitution" again if it makes you feel better.

--
Capt. JG -Hidequoted text -

Wrong

Right.

--
Capt. JG

Brilliant Jon,
Care to offer any proof?

The guy who killed 33 people because he had easy access to guns isn't
proof enough?

--
Capt. JG - Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

What about easy access to fertalizer and diesel?
Easy access to gasoline?
Easy access to automobiles?
Easy access to booze?
Easy access to hundreds of poisons?

Ever hear of the Bath School massacre? The worst school mass murder in
US history? No gun..44 kids dead.

Joe

In article .com,
Joe wrote:

The guy who killed 33 people because he had easy access to guns isn't
proof enough?

--
Capt. JG - Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

What about easy access to fertalizer and diesel?
Easy access to gasoline?
Easy access to automobiles?
Easy access to booze?
Easy access to hundreds of poisons?

Ever hear of the Bath School massacre? The worst school mass murder in
US history? No gun..44 kids dead.

What's your point? Is it that because 30,000 people die in automobile
accidents, we should ban cars, or because we have violent deaths that
might be preventable; we should do nothing? More guns! More guns!
Hurry, buy them before the crunch comes.

--
Capt. JG @@
www.sailnow.com

Jonathan Ganz wrote:
In article ,
katy wrote:

Why not... good idea. Too bad Reagan didn't think so. Someone
clinically depressed certainly should be restricted from easy access
to guns. Hate to tell you, but the majority of Americans favor more
strick gun control...

Obviously, you don't have the facts...

Some polls:

http://www.pollingreport.com/guns.htm

http://archives.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLI...uns/index.html



If that were really so, then there would be legislation...after all, we
are goventment by the people for the people...if what you say was RALLY
true, then the people would rise up and do something about it...if a
person says they're against something, but does nothing to change it and
sits in apathy, then they are really not agaisnt it...they just like to
blat their mouths off with an opinion...I think the more valid statistic
would be that most Americans just don't give a crap...if they did,
they'd do something...


I know you're a very innocent person, but do you dispute the polls? Do
you think the NRA is just going to lie down and let Congress regulate
their business without a fight? They pour millions into their hands
everytime a piece of legislation that would restrict their business
shows up.


Polls? You believe polls? How about Santa CLause, the Easter Bunny and
the Tooth Fairy, too, while you're at it? No, I have no belief in
polls. They are slanted to the poll developers slant. And I am not an
innocent...I am well aware of what goes on in the world.

In article ,
katy wrote:
Polls? You believe polls? How about Santa CLause, the Easter Bunny and
the Tooth Fairy, too, while you're at it? No, I have no belief in
polls. They are slanted to the poll developers slant. And I am not an
innocent...I am well aware of what goes on in the world.

How do you propose we find out what the public wants if we don't use
polls? Are all the polls wrong or just the ones you don't like?


--
Capt. JG @@
www.sailnow.com

On Apr 17, 2:40 pm, (Jonathan Ganz) wrote:
In article .com,





Joe wrote:

The guy who killed 33 people because he had easy access to guns isn't
proof enough?

--
Capt. JG -Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

What about easy access to fertalizer and diesel?
Easy access to gasoline?
Easy access to automobiles?
Easy access to booze?
Easy access to hundreds of poisons?

Ever hear of the Bath School massacre? The worst school mass murder in
US history? No gun..44 kids dead.

What's your point? Is it that because 30,000 people die in automobile
accidents, we should ban cars, or because we have violent deaths that
might be preventable; we should do nothing? More guns! More guns!
Hurry, buy them before the crunch comes.


The point is guns do not kill people, people kill people.
No one is forcing you to own a gun.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:B...Museumflag.jpg
No guns there....44 children murdered at school.

Joe




--
Capt. JG - Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

In article . com,
Joe wrote:
The point is guns do not kill people, people kill people.
No one is forcing you to own a gun.

Exactly. Therefore, prudent regulation of the PEOPLE who want to own
guns is justified and necessary.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:B...Museumflag.jpg
No guns there....44 children murdered at school.

1927?

Keep at it. Maybe you should claim Hillary did it.

--
Capt. JG @@
www.sailnow.com