Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... First one has to define exactly what is quality. How do we measure it. One measures it by accepted practices that have a history of working. That's what Lloyds standards in boatbuilding are all about. Tried and true. Lloyds standards mean a quality boat. Building a boat to no accepted measure of standards gets you a very inexpensive boat but you are trading safety and seaworthiness for a cheap price. If you don't have any reasonable standards yourself this will be acceptable to you but if you have high standards it will to entirely unacceptable. It's really very simple. Oh, speaking of standards, it's standard practice to reply to a post at the bottom, not the top. See, one little clue and I know you have low standards. You probably sail a MacGregor 26... Wilbur Hubbard Your definition of Quality is not explicit and you do not have any means of measuring it. Your understanding is vague and speculative. Therefore I can only conclude that you do not know what is quality. Nor will you be able to understand the meaning of building standards let alone the Mil Specs, history dockets and inspection and test plan. If you were to build a sailboat how much budget will you allocate for standards, quality programs and control. I fail to see your logic. I don't have to know the ins and outs of quality myself as I don't build boats myself. All I have to know is there exists certain boat building quality standards among which are Lloyds and ABS. These organizations certify boat building according to their established tried-and-true building methods and inspect for compliance as the boat is being built. We're talking yachts here not military ships so military specs. and irrelevant. As for budget requirements to build a boat to Lloyds specifications I believe the article posted above mentioned it might be up to 10% more for the inspection process alone. Of course, quality materials and proper scantlings necessarily add more to the cost than some cheap, fly-by-night outfit like MacGregor who just builds to the "sell a boat cheaper than anybody else can" standards. Wilbur Hubbard |
#2
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message .. snipped. As for budget requirements to build a boat to Lloyds specifications I believe the article posted above mentioned it might be up to 10% more for the inspection process alone. Of course, quality materials and proper scantlings necessarily add more to the cost than some cheap, fly-by-night outfit You are not quite correct here. Anybody can build to Lloyds specifications-they are available for anyone who wishes to follow them and certainly they will involve some extra cost if you compare the result with run-of-the-mill yacht builders specifications. But this does not involve getting Lloyds to inspect the boat either during or after building. If a builder says he is building to Lloyds specifications you have to take his word for it. If you want a gold plated assurance that the boat complies then you must specify not only that she is built to Lloyds requirements but also under under Lloyds survey, inspection and test. That is what is going to cost serious money as the material suppliers will have to have this requirement passed down to them to ensure the materials comply. Then the Lloyds surveyor (N.B. not 'inspector'!) will have to visit the yard at certain defined stages of construction and sign her off so that work can proceed. Then after sea trials you will get final approval . Your chances of getting this done for any mass produced yacht are not good. |
#3
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Edgar wrote:
"Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message .. snipped. As for budget requirements to build a boat to Lloyds specifications I believe the article posted above mentioned it might be up to 10% more for the inspection process alone. Of course, quality materials and proper scantlings necessarily add more to the cost than some cheap, fly-by-night outfit You are not quite correct here. Anybody can build to Lloyds specifications-they are available for anyone who wishes to follow them and certainly they will involve some extra cost if you compare the result with run-of-the-mill yacht builders specifications. But this does not involve getting Lloyds to inspect the boat either during or after building. If a builder says he is building to Lloyds specifications you have to take his word for it. If you want a gold plated assurance that the boat complies then you must specify not only that she is built to Lloyds requirements but also under under Lloyds survey, inspection and test. That is what is going to cost serious money as the material suppliers will have to have this requirement passed down to them to ensure the materials comply. Then the Lloyds surveyor (N.B. not 'inspector'!) will have to visit the yard at certain defined stages of construction and sign her off so that work can proceed. Then after sea trials you will get final approval . Your chances of getting this done for any mass produced yacht are not good. I seem to recall that one of Edward Heath's yachts (Morning Cloud 3 perhaps?) was built to Lloyds 100+A1 standards. She broke up in a storm in the English Channel whilst on delivery from Kent to The Solent. Standards? Don't make me laugh! DNP |
#4
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Edgar" wrote in message ... "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message .. snipped. As for budget requirements to build a boat to Lloyds specifications I believe the article posted above mentioned it might be up to 10% more for the inspection process alone. Of course, quality materials and proper scantlings necessarily add more to the cost than some cheap, fly-by-night outfit You are not quite correct here. Anybody can build to Lloyds specifications-they are available for anyone who wishes to follow them and certainly they will involve some extra cost if you compare the result with run-of-the-mill yacht builders specifications. But this does not involve getting Lloyds to inspect the boat either during or after building. If a builder says he is building to Lloyds specifications you have to take his word for it. An individual may build a vessel to Lloyd's standards but it will not be Lloyd's certified unless it's inpected by Lloyds in the processess of it's being built. Personally, I would not take the word of a builder. I would have to see the certificate of compliance or whatever it's called nowadays before I would trust it is built to Lloyd's standards. If you want a gold plated assurance that the boat complies then you must specify not only that she is built to Lloyds requirements but also under under Lloyds survey, inspection and test. Yes, that's the value of complying with Lloyds specs - getting the certificate. Going full zoot. . . That is what is going to cost serious money as the material suppliers will have to have this requirement passed down to them to ensure the materials comply. Then the Lloyds surveyor (N.B. not 'inspector'!) will have to visit the yard at certain defined stages of construction and sign her off so that work can proceed. Then after sea trials you will get final approval . Your chances of getting this done for any mass produced yacht are not good. It's good if the builder is willing to pay for it and the buyer is willing to pay for the quality. Probably even save the extra costs over a ten year period on reduced insurance premiums. Wilbur Hubbard |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Standards | Cruising | |||
American Boating & Yacht Council Standards, new or older for 1/16 the price ? | Boat Building | |||
Bill Moyers on environment, politics and Christian fundamentalists | General | |||
Republican election standards | General | |||
STANDARDS | ASA |