Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "krj" wrote in message ... Wilbur Hubbard wrote: "Don White" wrote in message ... "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message ... There are high standards and there are low standards. For, example a sailboat built to ABYS standards is poorly built compared to a sailboat built to Lloyds standards. And a boat that's not built to any existing accepted standard is a very questionable proposition. Yet, today's yacht purchaser seems be unconcerned with boat building standards. They are more concerned with how many it sleeps or if the head is enclosed. You should ask yourself why. Why? I'll be more than happy to tell you why. Because people these days themselves have few or no standards. About 30% of the people in this country call themselves Democrats, i.e., no standards. About 10% of the people in this country are illiterate, i.e., no standards. But since most of that 10% are Democrats I suppose it's six of one and half-dozen of the other. About 90% of the people in this country watch excessive hours of television daily, i.e., no standards. Less than half the people in this country regularly attend church, i.e., no moral standards. These are but a few examples of a standard-less society. Now, what's this got to do with sailboats? Lots, believe me, lots! Take the MacGregor 26X and 26M. Neither boat is built to any accepted standard of quality at all. Yet, a standardless boat is the leading seller in that size range. Is that not convincing proof that people these days have no personal standards? Can you imagine anybody concerned with safety and proper boat construction actually paying good money for a boat that's built to no accepted boat building standards? It's incredible to think such a sad state of affairs has eventuated. Wilbur Hubbard Never heard of the 'throw away society'? Exactly fits the bill. Ask yourself why throw it away? Because it's a cheap, shoddy, **** poor pile of crap suited only for short-term use. Has MacGregor written all over it, doesn't it? It's like walking around with a sign plastered on your back which says, "I'm a cheap, shoddy, **** poor pile of crap posing as a human being." No pride in your things means no pride in yourself. Sad! Wilbur Hubbard Wilber, I've seen your boat You are a cheap, shoddy, **** poor pile of crap posing as a human being. You've seen my Swan 68? Where did you see her? Wilbur Hubbard |
#2
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wilbur Hubbard wrote:
"krj" wrote in message ... Wilbur Hubbard wrote: "Don White" wrote in message ... "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message ... There are high standards and there are low standards. For, example a sailboat built to ABYS standards is poorly built compared to a sailboat built to Lloyds standards. And a boat that's not built to any existing accepted standard is a very questionable proposition. Yet, today's yacht purchaser seems be unconcerned with boat building standards. They are more concerned with how many it sleeps or if the head is enclosed. You should ask yourself why. Why? I'll be more than happy to tell you why. Because people these days themselves have few or no standards. About 30% of the people in this country call themselves Democrats, i.e., no standards. About 10% of the people in this country are illiterate, i.e., no standards. But since most of that 10% are Democrats I suppose it's six of one and half-dozen of the other. About 90% of the people in this country watch excessive hours of television daily, i.e., no standards. Less than half the people in this country regularly attend church, i.e., no moral standards. These are but a few examples of a standard-less society. Now, what's this got to do with sailboats? Lots, believe me, lots! Take the MacGregor 26X and 26M. Neither boat is built to any accepted standard of quality at all. Yet, a standardless boat is the leading seller in that size range. Is that not convincing proof that people these days have no personal standards? Can you imagine anybody concerned with safety and proper boat construction actually paying good money for a boat that's built to no accepted boat building standards? It's incredible to think such a sad state of affairs has eventuated. Wilbur Hubbard Never heard of the 'throw away society'? Exactly fits the bill. Ask yourself why throw it away? Because it's a cheap, shoddy, **** poor pile of crap suited only for short-term use. Has MacGregor written all over it, doesn't it? It's like walking around with a sign plastered on your back which says, "I'm a cheap, shoddy, **** poor pile of crap posing as a human being." No pride in your things means no pride in yourself. Sad! Wilbur Hubbard Wilber, I've seen your boat You are a cheap, shoddy, **** poor pile of crap posing as a human being. You've seen my Swan 68? Where did you see her? Wilbur Hubbard Swan 68? You really are delusional. It's a musturd yellow Coronado that was in Buttonwood or Black Water Sound a couple of years ago |
#3
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 12:41:57 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard"
wrote: There are high standards and there are low standards. For, example a sailboat built to ABYS standards is poorly built compared to a sailboat built to Lloyds standards. And a boat that's not built to any existing accepted standard is a very questionable proposition. Yet, today's yacht purchaser seems be unconcerned with boat building standards. They are more concerned with how many it sleeps or if the head is enclosed. You should ask yourself why. Why? I'll be more than happy to tell you why. Because people these days themselves have few or no standards. About 30% of the people in this country call themselves Democrats, i.e., no standards. About 10% of the people in this country are illiterate, i.e., no standards. But since most of that 10% are Democrats I suppose it's six of one and half-dozen of the other. About 90% of the people in this country watch excessive hours of television daily, i.e., no standards. Less than half the people in this country regularly attend church, i.e., no moral standards. These are but a few examples of a standard-less society. Now, what's this got to do with sailboats? Lots, believe me, lots! Take the MacGregor 26X and 26M. Neither boat is built to any accepted standard of quality at all. Yet, a standardless boat is the leading seller in that size range. Is that not convincing proof that people these days have no personal standards? Can you imagine anybody concerned with safety and proper boat construction actually paying good money for a boat that's built to no accepted boat building standards? It's incredible to think such a sad state of affairs has eventuated. Keep in mind that many "premier" name boats use teak and cabinetry to represent quality. Initial visible hardware may be 3 steps above an inexpensive boat like a Mac, Catalina or Coronado, but hardware can be readily replaced. Design and cost is the first consideration for high-volume sales, and the Mac and Catalina boats have done well here. Hull/deck construction and the consistency of the materials and manufacturing processes are the "quality" hallmarks of mass produced boats. Their sales and the longevity of the boats speak well to their efforts on that issue. Why do you suppose many sailboat builders have gone out of business? The boats found no market as new, but still are bought used, laboriously maintained, if not sailed, by those who adhere to your shallow method of "standards." Such conduct reminds me of that of those fans of old "classic" cars who lovingly replace every piece of rusted metal and rotten upholstery. The car becomes different in its entirety, has cost many times more than its original cost, is still archaic in its engineering, won't be used as originally intended, but it is "classic." Ok if that's what you want, but I simply go to the appropriate museum to view such fossils. Having done much sailing and living aboard many boats of varying costs from my basement here in N. Illinois, I can speak with more authority than those who simply hook-swing on barnacle-encrusted old boats, which will perhaps sadly too soon become part of the natural seascape in obeying the sea-faring version of nature's "Ashes to ashes," which can be termed nautically as "Coronado to reef." More important to me is the quality of the boat in hull/deck materials and that tried and true construction techniques are used. Contrary to your limited experience in that area, I have done considerable study, employing the experience of thousands of man-years of sailboat owners. Had to use thousands, since it takes about a thousand man-years of sailboat owner "experience" to glean about one man-year of sensible data. Having seen that the Parker Dawson didn't even use washers under its deck cleat nuts, and learning from a friend - a blue water sailor - that he found while preparing his recently purchased Ted Hood designed Wauquiez Hood 38 MK II a serious thru-hull builder error which could sink him, and seeing other instances of "quality" boats being less than their reputation, I am especially sensitive to initial build quality. You have used the Wauquiez name favorably in one of your eloquent trolls, and I have no doubt it is a fine boat, but reality steps in even there. Below is a link to the Mac 26 build process. Nice. You probably know that drunk Frenchmen are less reliable boat builders than illegal Mexicans who can be deported should they make a mistake, but make a note anyway. To sum up the whole "standards" issue, which is always iffy unless one actually supervises construction, a boat is just so many pounds of materials put together to serve a design purpose. Initial hull/deck materials and attentive construction process are the premier consideration to me. All afterward can be improved if needed/desired, within the design constraints. I know you feel threatened by Macs, especially the 90HP ETECS, but you will have to deal with that insecurity as you travel the path of life. Maybe it helps to tell you that if I get a Mac I'll probably put only a 25HP 4-stroke on it, and paint it mustard. Maybe not. Anyway, as I see it no boat will provide class to any owner, but an owner may provide class to any boat. http://www.macgregor26.com/construct...nstruction.htm --Vic |
#4
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Vic Smith" wrote in message ... On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 12:41:57 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: There are high standards and there are low standards. For, example a sailboat built to ABYS standards is poorly built compared to a sailboat built to Lloyds standards. And a boat that's not built to any existing accepted standard is a very questionable proposition. Yet, today's yacht purchaser seems be unconcerned with boat building standards. They are more concerned with how many it sleeps or if the head is enclosed. You should ask yourself why. Why? I'll be more than happy to tell you why. Because people these days themselves have few or no standards. About 30% of the people in this country call themselves Democrats, i.e., no standards. About 10% of the people in this country are illiterate, i.e., no standards. But since most of that 10% are Democrats I suppose it's six of one and half-dozen of the other. About 90% of the people in this country watch excessive hours of television daily, i.e., no standards. Less than half the people in this country regularly attend church, i.e., no moral standards. These are but a few examples of a standard-less society. Now, what's this got to do with sailboats? Lots, believe me, lots! Take the MacGregor 26X and 26M. Neither boat is built to any accepted standard of quality at all. Yet, a standardless boat is the leading seller in that size range. Is that not convincing proof that people these days have no personal standards? Can you imagine anybody concerned with safety and proper boat construction actually paying good money for a boat that's built to no accepted boat building standards? It's incredible to think such a sad state of affairs has eventuated. Keep in mind that many "premier" name boats use teak and cabinetry to represent quality. Initial visible hardware may be 3 steps above an inexpensive boat like a Mac, Catalina or Coronado, but hardware can be readily replaced. Design and cost is the first consideration for high-volume sales, and the Mac and Catalina boats have done well here. Hull/deck construction and the consistency of the materials and manufacturing processes are the "quality" hallmarks of mass produced boats. Their sales and the longevity of the boats speak well to their efforts on that issue. Why do you suppose many sailboat builders have gone out of business? The boats found no market as new, but still are bought used, laboriously maintained, if not sailed, by those who adhere to your shallow method of "standards." Such conduct reminds me of that of those fans of old "classic" cars who lovingly replace every piece of rusted metal and rotten upholstery. The car becomes different in its entirety, has cost many times more than its original cost, is still archaic in its engineering, won't be used as originally intended, but it is "classic." Ok if that's what you want, but I simply go to the appropriate museum to view such fossils. Having done much sailing and living aboard many boats of varying costs from my basement here in N. Illinois, I can speak with more authority than those who simply hook-swing on barnacle-encrusted old boats, which will perhaps sadly too soon become part of the natural seascape in obeying the sea-faring version of nature's "Ashes to ashes," which can be termed nautically as "Coronado to reef." More important to me is the quality of the boat in hull/deck materials and that tried and true construction techniques are used. Contrary to your limited experience in that area, I have done considerable study, employing the experience of thousands of man-years of sailboat owners. Had to use thousands, since it takes about a thousand man-years of sailboat owner "experience" to glean about one man-year of sensible data. Having seen that the Parker Dawson didn't even use washers under its deck cleat nuts, and learning from a friend - a blue water sailor - that he found while preparing his recently purchased Ted Hood designed Wauquiez Hood 38 MK II a serious thru-hull builder error which could sink him, and seeing other instances of "quality" boats being less than their reputation, I am especially sensitive to initial build quality. You have used the Wauquiez name favorably in one of your eloquent trolls, and I have no doubt it is a fine boat, but reality steps in even there. Below is a link to the Mac 26 build process. Nice. You probably know that drunk Frenchmen are less reliable boat builders than illegal Mexicans who can be deported should they make a mistake, but make a note anyway. To sum up the whole "standards" issue, which is always iffy unless one actually supervises construction, a boat is just so many pounds of materials put together to serve a design purpose. Initial hull/deck materials and attentive construction process are the premier consideration to me. All afterward can be improved if needed/desired, within the design constraints. I know you feel threatened by Macs, especially the 90HP ETECS, but you will have to deal with that insecurity as you travel the path of life. Maybe it helps to tell you that if I get a Mac I'll probably put only a 25HP 4-stroke on it, and paint it mustard. Maybe not. Anyway, as I see it no boat will provide class to any owner, but an owner may provide class to any boat. http://www.macgregor26.com/construct...nstruction.htm --Vic Some good thoughts but there need be no gray areas and shoddy building practices if one builds a sailboat according to Lloyds standards. Good building practices are no accident and they generally always result in a more expensive boat. The only way to produce an inexpensive boat is to not build it to high standards. People know this but they go ahead and buy junk and they buy junk in bulk quantities. It's stupid and it's shameful. If you build a boat to Lloyds specifications you must have almost everything inspected and checked off a punch list. The inspector insures there are no shortcuts or shoddy workmanship. The inspector is not free. So, of course the selling price of the yacht must be higher. It all goes back to standards. But a boat built to Lloyds standards and you get the best. Buy a piece of garbage like the MacGregor and you are guaranteed a cut-corners boat. Owning a cut-corners boat demonstrates for the entire world to see that the owner is a cut-corners type of guy. If a lawyer is proud of his MacGregor 26 then that tells me he's a cut-corners person and not the person I want litigating an important case where cutting corners will most likely be disastrous. If my doctor owns and is proud of a Mac26 then what corners is he going to cut when he operates on me. Is he going to wash his hands thoroughly? Is he going to use autoclaved instruments? So, when I see any cut-corners kind of guy out in a Mac26 I have to ask myself what other corners is this guy going to cut. Does he even know the basic navigation rules? Does he know how to anchor? Does he have the proper safety equipment? After all he has already demonstrated that he has no standards because of his boat purchase. Isn't it likely his sloppiness and lack of standards permeates his entire life? I think so. That's why I don't want any Macgregor's anywhere near me. The good news is offshore where I am most of the time one rarely sees a Mac26 because even if Mac owners have low standards they still value their lives enough to stay within site of land. Wilbur Hubbard |
#5
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 16:37:38 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard"
wrote: "Vic Smith" wrote in message .. . On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 12:41:57 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: Wilbur, You are making the mistake od assuming that people carry their diligence or lack of in their profession to all aspects of their lives. As a general truth, they don't. Life and individual behaviour are not that consistent, not that black and white. Your simplistic arguement does not hold true. There are several examples of this. How many of us males who are known for our rational and intelligent decision making in our careers have married a pretty face only to learn later that "a pretty face is high maintenance"? How many successful parents when faced with wayward children initially refuse to believe the evidence yest it was apparent to others all along? How many of us with good financial acumen in investments and property make decisions to purchase something based upon other than "the best buy for your money"? People are not consistent, not by any means. regards Peter Owning a cut-corners boat demonstrates for the entire world to see that the owner is a cut-corners type of guy. If a lawyer is proud of his MacGregor 26 then that tells me he's a cut-corners person and not the person I want litigating an important case where cutting corners will most likely be disastrous. If my doctor owns and is proud of a Mac26 then what corners is he going to cut when he operates on me. Is he going to wash his hands thoroughly? Is he going to use autoclaved instruments? So, when I see any cut-corners kind of guy out in a Mac26 I have to ask myself what other corners is this guy going to cut. Does he even know the basic navigation rules? Does he know how to anchor? Does he have the proper safety equipment? After all he has already demonstrated that he has no standards because of his boat purchase. Isn't it likely his sloppiness and lack of standards permeates his entire life? I think so. That's why I don't want any Macgregor's anywhere near me. The good news is offshore where I am most of the time one rarely sees a Mac26 because even if Mac owners have low standards they still value their lives enough to stay within site of land. Wilbur Hubbard |
#6
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Hendra" wrote in message ... On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 16:37:38 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: "Vic Smith" wrote in message . .. On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 12:41:57 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: Wilbur, You are making the mistake od assuming that people carry their diligence or lack of in their profession to all aspects of their lives. As a general truth, they don't. Life and individual behaviour are not that consistent, not that black and white. Your simplistic arguement does not hold true. There are several examples of this. How many of us males who are known for our rational and intelligent decision making in our careers have married a pretty face only to learn later that "a pretty face is high maintenance"? How many successful parents when faced with wayward children initially refuse to believe the evidence yest it was apparent to others all along? How many of us with good financial acumen in investments and property make decisions to purchase something based upon other than "the best buy for your money"? People are not consistent, not by any means. True, but I'd rather associate with people with high standards who are inconsistent than people with low standards who are inconsistent. Make sense? Wilbur Hubbard |
#7
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 31, 8:41 am, "Wilbur Hubbard"
wrote: Yet, today's yacht purchaser seems be unconcerned with boat building standards. They are more concerned with how many it sleeps or if the head is enclosed. You should ask yourself why. Pretty simple........... they got diffrent standards than you. They want a boat that is fun to sit in, drink wine, and pretend they ahve a slice of the rich and famous life. Why? I'll be more than happy to tell you why. Because people these days themselves have few or no standards. About 30% of the people in this country call themselves Democrats, i.e., no standards. Whooooo dude. Im a member of the Democratic party and belive me I have some very specific standards. That is why I DID NOT vote for BUSH! Just because I do stuff that you do not agree with or understand dont mean I aint got standards. Just means your so ****ing stupid you can not recognize there is more than one way to do things. Less than half the people in this country regularly attend church, i.e., no moral standards. Again, I got morals and standards, and ethics, etc............. they just aint the same as yours. For example, I dont agree with what you say. Therefor, I have high moral standards Standards that you fall woefully short of attaining. Neither boat is built to any accepted standard of quality at all. Yet, a standardless boat is the leading seller in that size range. So, a lot of people enjoy them cause they're fun and can buy them. Now dont go telling me that I can buy a ****ty hamburger cause it anint good enough to meet your standards of a hamburger. Just so happens I like cheep lousy burgers. So dont go telling me I got poor tast or dont meet your standards..... GFY! (oh that means Go **** Yourself if you do not meet my standard of inteligence). Thanks for the troll. Its a good reminder that there really are lots of nut cases who want to legislate their morality and standards on me. That is why I vote Democrtatic. Dont like thoes bible thumping Teliban types in the White House. Eight years is enough. I hope I offered enough words for your troll to get somthing going here. I got to fill some holes with epoxy now the temp is up. Good one Wilbur ![]() Bob PS I deleted the post to .crusing. I dont like posting this kind of **** over there. Wilbur Hubbard |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Standards | Cruising | |||
American Boating & Yacht Council Standards, new or older for 1/16 the price ? | Boat Building | |||
Bill Moyers on environment, politics and Christian fundamentalists | General | |||
Republican election standards | General | |||
STANDARDS | ASA |