Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Vic Smith" wrote in message ... On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 16:47:54 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: wrote in message ... First one has to define exactly what is quality. How do we measure it. One measures it by accepted practices that have a history of working. That's what Lloyds standards in boatbuilding are all about. Tried and true. Lloyds standards mean a quality boat. Building a boat to no accepted measure of standards gets you a very inexpensive boat but you are trading safety and seaworthiness for a cheap price. If you don't have any reasonable standards yourself this will be acceptable to you but if you have high standards it will to entirely unacceptable. It's really very simple. Oh, speaking of standards, it's standard practice to reply to a post at the bottom, not the top. See, one little clue and I know you have low standards. You probably sail a MacGregor 26... I believe the Wauquiez I mentioned earlier, which had a serious build defect, touts the Lloyds Standards imprimatur in one fashion or another. While not disagreeing about standards being essential in just about any endeavor, there are standards and there are standards. For Powersailors (very cool term) the Mac sets the standard. Would you think less of the Coronado if it didn't have a Lloyds Standard stamp of approval? Here's a link giving a cursory look at Lloyds Standards and others. http://www.boats.com/news-reviews/ar....html?lid=2773 Very costly initially and must be renewed yearly. Other browsing indicates the term Lloyds Standards is used - or misused - dishonestly, as a true Lloyds Standard boat must meet many requirements. Using the term Lloyds Standards is often just sizzle. In your heart you know that. One of my concerns with the Mac is the standards used in its materials and construction. Since it will mostly be used parked near your Coronado, it must have a solid enough deck to install thru-deck A/C and room in the cockpit or transom for the genset. But it won't go to blue water so the Lloyds Standards are not an issue. Gunkholing, slow cruising and leisurely sailing are the Macs suite of capabilities in my eyes, and owners seem pretty happy doing those things with them., Lloyds or no Lloyds. --Vic Thanks. That's a good link. It proves my point. It says: "For that same reason, American builders have been slow to encourage the use of classifications because buyers aren't familiar with them and, almost to a man, they all claim to build better boats than required by the societies. Whether that is true or not is just as debatable as whether a buyer would want a boat built to society standards. One well-known builder noted that it is impossible to build the high-speed motoryachts, now so popular, to classification because of the sacrifices necessary to keep the weight to a minimum. The societies, on the other hand, point out that they have been classing high-speed patrol craft and other speed-oriented vessels for many years, and suggest that the builder is probably cutting many corners in search of an extra knot or two." Cutting many corners in search for an extra knot or two? Sound familiar? Sounds like it describes a MacGregor 26. Wilbur Hubbard |
#2
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 18:26:47 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard"
wrote: Thanks. That's a good link. It proves my point. It says: "For that same reason, American builders have been slow to encourage the use of classifications because buyers aren't familiar with them and, almost to a man, they all claim to build better boats than required by the societies. Whether that is true or not is just as debatable as whether a buyer would want a boat built to society standards. One well-known builder noted that it is impossible to build the high-speed motoryachts, now so popular, to classification because of the sacrifices necessary to keep the weight to a minimum. The societies, on the other hand, point out that they have been classing high-speed patrol craft and other speed-oriented vessels for many years, and suggest that the builder is probably cutting many corners in search of an extra knot or two." Cutting many corners in search for an extra knot or two? Sound familiar? Sounds like it describes a MacGregor 26. Maybe, but http://www.findarticles.com/p/articl..._61555439/pg_3 "Even though ABS's customer base is primarily big shipping, its rules on scantlings, the dimensions of a boat's structural members, are sometimes referenced by manufacturers of recreational vessels. Private mega-yachts are usually built to ABS rules, which are all but unheard of for the average pleasure boat." Neither the Mac or Coronado can be classified as a mega-yacht. Here's a link pointing to the ABS standards guidebooks. http://www.eagle.org/rules/intro.html If you'll tell me which book I need to verify standards for a boat such as a Mac 26 or a Coronado 27 I'll buy it and take it down to the boat builder to see if he is up to snuff. Without your help, I'll have to rely on the experience of people who actually own the boat. --Vic |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Standards | Cruising | |||
American Boating & Yacht Council Standards, new or older for 1/16 the price ? | Boat Building | |||
Bill Moyers on environment, politics and Christian fundamentalists | General | |||
Republican election standards | General | |||
STANDARDS | ASA |