Sean Monaghan wrote:
miguel wrote in
:

Kali wrote:
miguel said:
: Kadaitcha Gimp Retard He-Bitch wrote:
: Translation: even though all kookologists agree that taking usenet
: to real life is prime kooksign, that's what I'm trying to
: accomplish.
: Good job there kOOk.
: miguel
So, what are your plans for Steve Cheney?
If I ever meet him, I will put him in the hospital.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^

This is not a flame; this is a clear threat of physical violence. This
is something we'd expect from Richard "the St00pid" Bullis, or from
Edmond Heinz Wollmann - not the words of a 'marginal kook', or from
someone who is merely involved in a Usenet flamewar.

Sean, Kali recently stated that she was considered the most reasonable
and judicious of the kookologists. If by that she is contrasting herself
with you, K-Bitch and ****stain, you can imagine the difficulty I or
anybody else might have in giving her any points for that claim.

You have no idea of the extent to which Steve Chaney has taken matters
to RL over the past 12 years wrt me, and you have no idea of the extent
to which his raging insanity has caused him to make unspeakably nasty
claims about my children and my grandchild.

Charlotte, on the other hand, does. If you have any questions about
whether Chaney deserves to have his ass kicked, feel free to direct them
to her.

Now, onto the unarticulated premise of your post, viz: there is never
any cause for threatening violence over a usenet post. Suppose Chaney
says to your face about your 13 year old daughter, "Sean, are you
bringing your 13 year old daughter in for the 1000 man **** tonight?" Do
you put him on the ground and kick him, or do you play your usenet tard
games? You do the latter if you're a coward.

Why should the result be any different if he says it on usenet instead
of to your face, particularly when part of his game is to say it often
enough, and to use your daughter's actual name, so that she gets google
stacked?

miguel

On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:04:36 -0700, miguel did the cha-cha, and screamed:
Sean Monaghan wrote:
miguel wrote:
Kali wrote:
miguel said:
: Kadaitcha Gimp Retard He-Bitch wrote: Translation: even though all
: kookologists agree that taking usenet to real life is prime
: kooksign, that's what I'm trying to accomplish.
: Good job there kOOk.
: miguel
So, what are your plans for Steve Cheney?
If I ever meet him, I will put him in the hospital.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^

This is not a flame; this is a clear threat of physical violence. This
is something we'd expect from Richard "the St00pid" Bullis, or from
Edmond Heinz Wollmann - not the words of a 'marginal kook', or from
someone who is merely involved in a Usenet flamewar.

Sean, Kali recently stated that she was considered the most reasonable and
judicious of the kookologists. If by that she is contrasting herself with
you, K-Bitch and ****stain, you can imagine the difficulty I or anybody
else might have in giving her any points for that claim.

You have no idea of the extent to which Steve Chaney has taken matters to
RL over the past 12 years wrt me, and you have no idea of the extent to
which his raging insanity has caused him to make unspeakably nasty claims
about my children and my grandchild.

Who cares? This is usenet.

Charlotte, on the other hand, does. If you have any questions about
whether Chaney deserves to have his ass kicked, feel free to direct them
to her.

Steve owns your brain as much as you own his.

Now, onto the unarticulated premise of your post, viz: there is never any
cause for threatening violence over a usenet post. Suppose Chaney says to
your face about your 13 year old daughter, "Sean, are you bringing your 13
year old daughter in for the 1000 man **** tonight?" Do you put him on the
ground and kick him, or do you play your usenet tard games? You do the
latter if you're a coward.

You do the former if you're a k00k.

Why should the result be any different if he says it on usenet instead of
to your face, particularly when part of his game is to say it often
enough, and to use your daughter's actual name, so that she gets google
stacked?

K00k.

--
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Hail Eris! TM#5; COOSN-029-06-71069
Cardinal Snarky of the Fannish Inquisition

Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/

AUK FAQ: http://www.caballista.org/auk/faq.html

WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, February 2007
Message-ID: 1

WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, January 2007 MID:
70

"6. Who is a net.giggler?" -- Bloxy's "Monkay", that's who. Message-ID:


"'I find this genetic sequence all the way down the evolutionary
ladder,' he says. 'The major significance of this protein is that it may
be a communication line between the nucleus and the mitochondria.'" --
Andrew B. Chung, from
http://gtalumni.org/Publications/mag...n91/chung.html

"Pot...kettle...so black it picks cotton." -- But Alex "Dink" Cain isn't
racist at all, oh no. Not him. Why, some of his best friends are porch
monkeys. I'll bet. Message-ID:

"You think I don't know this? What gives you the right to speak as if
you have authority over me? You have none. I like his use of the words
'wanton woman'. They are biblical. Maybe there is some hope for k man
after all. You? There is no hope for you at all you freak of nature. Go
back to the hole you came out of." -- Atlanta Olympiada Kane "knows"
Kadaitcha Man was referring to me, but addressed him as though he was
referring to himself, then foamed all over me, in Message-ID:


"No effort at all c*cksucking you, b1tch." -- At last, the Monkey-man
comes out of the closet, in MID: aXkth.3535$QE6.1902@trnddc02

http://www6.kingdomofloathing.com/login.php

"This is a sandwich made by a Spam Witch. You know why Spam Witches
can't starve if they're at the beach? Because they can always eat the
sand which is there." -- Spam Witch sammich, from The Kingdom of
Loathing

http://www.runescape.com/
No one expects the Fannish Inquisition!
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Cabal_...y_Pretzel/join
Cabal of the Holy International Discordian Internet & Usenet Terrorist
Pretzel

"i have no need for sex; i'd rather tease you, honeybuns." -- Teh Mop
Jockey doesn't know the meaning of "TMI". MID:


"What are marijuana tablets?"

"When logic and proportion
Have fallen softly dead
And the White Knight is talking backwards
And the Red Queen's 'off with her head!'
Remember what the dormouse said:
'Feed your head
Feed your head
Feed your head'"
-- "White Rabbit", Jefferson Airplane

I own "James C Cracked is God!!!":
MID: .com

"Chips on you dud, you got bugged for being near me, Viruses transmit
that way you know." -- Blooey: Master of the Autoflame. Message-ID:


"The nonsense screeds you compose and post to usenet lack any kind of
coherent and rational meaning whatsoever, and are composed of random
bits and pieces stolen from mythology, science fiction, religion, comic
books, etc., placed into a blender, and the switch turned to the highest
setting.
About every other screed has droppings of death threats, racial
bigotry, laughably false prophesies of gloom and doom, and inane
attempts to extort money. These bland, meaningless, pulpy messes are
then trowled into usenet; identical or nearly identical screeds are
repeated ad nauseum." -- Art Deco had to clean up bits of Warhol for
days after using the Hammer on him

"Q: How many Bush administration officials does it take to change a
light bulb?
A: None. There is no need to change anything. We made the right decision
to stick with that light bulb. People who say that it is burned out are
giving aid and encouragement to the Forces of Darkness." -- Anon.

"Outlaw amateur assassins!" -- Chiun

"Property is theft."
-- P. J. Proudhon
"Property is liberty."
-- P. J. Proudhon
"Property is impossible."
-- P. J. Proudhon

"Etymology:
Argumentum ad Septicus : argument to putrefaction. Derived from Septicum
Argumentum : putrefaction of argument.

"Septic \Sep"tic\, Septical \Sep"tic*al\
a. [L. septicus to make putrid: cf. F. septique.]
Having power to promote putrefaction. Of or relating to or
caused by putrefaction." -- Kadaitcha Man, indirectly to
Donald "Skeptic"/"Septic" Alford, in MID:

"I never fail to be amazing" -- Looney Maroon for September 2006 nominee
William Barwell's ego knows no bounds. MID:


"Red meat won't hurt you. Fuzzy, blue-green meat will."
-- Zog the etc., in alt.discordia (correct
as needed)

"may you live to whatever age you'd like to." -- Dave Hillstrom,
in alt.discordia

"We are most nearly ourselves when we achieve the seriousness of the
child at play." -- Heraclitus

"And thats another mistake on your part. Your 'playing' games on usenet,
and I'm not playing...It has nothing to do with impressing you, it has
more to do with making sure you have the education you'll need to debate.
The debate is no fun for me if you are mentally incapable of it. I'm
giving you an opportunity to educate yourself. That's all." -- A trashy
former virus-writer turned Outer Filth doesn't know if he's playing or
working, in MID: om

"I am incapable of original thoughts" -- Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ has an honest
moment, in MID:

"But now the end is near. Now Mark Foley comes along and is making
almost all liberal dreams come true and seriously, I'm sorry for it.
See, I believe in karma. I believe what comes around goes around and I
know full well that it's just bad juju to wish such a level of turmoil
and ill upon other humans, warmongering gay-hating maladroits or no, and
that the real path of enlightenment is paved with forgiveness and
progress and white-hot love and turning the other cheek and scotch.

"In fact, Jesus said something about that, I do believe. He said, "Knock
it off already with the warmongering and the hating of each other and
let's all get some wine and party like it's 2012." Then again, he never
saw Karl Rove stab the nation with the dull ice pick of bogus fear. He
never heard George W. Bush describe brutal war and the death of tens of
thousands as "just a comma" in world history.

"Check that. Maybe I'm not so sorry after all." -- Mark Morford,
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cg...ve/2006/10/11/
notes101106.DTL&nl=fix
http://tinyurl.com/kusmr

The Original Demon Prince of Absurdity
wrote in
news
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:04:36 -0700, miguel did the cha-cha, and
screamed:
Sean Monaghan wrote:
miguel wrote:
Kali wrote:
miguel said:
: Kadaitcha Gimp Retard He-Bitch wrote: Translation: even though
: all kookologists agree that taking usenet to real life is prime
: kooksign, that's what I'm trying to accomplish.
: Good job there kOOk. miguel So, what are your plans for Steve
: Cheney? If I ever meet him, I will put him in the hospital.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^

This is not a flame; this is a clear threat of physical violence.
This is something we'd expect from Richard "the St00pid" Bullis, or
from Edmond Heinz Wollmann - not the words of a 'marginal kook', or
from someone who is merely involved in a Usenet flamewar.

Sean, Kali recently stated that she was considered the most reasonable
and judicious of the kookologists. If by that she is contrasting
herself with you, K-Bitch and ****stain, you can imagine the
difficulty I or anybody else might have in giving her any points for
that claim.

You have no idea of the extent to which Steve Chaney has taken matters
to RL over the past 12 years wrt me, and you have no idea of the
extent to which his raging insanity has caused him to make unspeakably
nasty claims about my children and my grandchild.

Who cares? This is usenet.

Did you read the first sentence? When matters are taken into real life, why
is it so unreasonable to respond in real life? Miguel has merely written
on usenet what he would like to do in real life in response to what someone
has done to him in real life.

This whole "it's only words on a screen" is hogwash because it neglects any
context. It's not such a black and white issue. An appropriate response
depends on what those words are, and whose screen on which they appear. For
example, what if those words happen to contain numbers as well, such as a
SSN and credit card information, and those words appear on the screen of
identity thieves? Have a read on this identify theft victims story and then
tell me that Miguel or any other kook on your list deserves a similar fate?
What if the "words on a screen" are a complete fabrication and appear the
the screen of your employer, or if you're self employeed, potential
customers.

Words on a screen can have real life impact, and to categorically label
someone as a kook because he/she writes on usenet what he would like to do
in real life, is absurd. IMHO, the fact that Miguel has been busting the
balls and trolling kookologist with great succes is the only reason that
he's been nominated for one of your infantile awards.

John Fereira wrote:
The Original Demon Prince of ****stain:
Miguel:

snip

You have no idea of the extent to which Steve Chaney has taken matters
to RL over the past 12 years wrt me, and you have no idea of the
extent to which his raging insanity has caused him to make unspeakably
nasty claims about my children and my grandchild.

Who cares? This is usenet.

Did you read the first sentence? When matters are taken into real life, why
is it so unreasonable to respond in real life? Miguel has merely written
on usenet what he would like to do in real life in response to what someone
has done to him in real life.

This whole "it's only words on a screen" is hogwash because it neglects any
context. It's not such a black and white issue. An appropriate response
depends on what those words are, and whose screen on which they appear. For
example, what if those words happen to contain numbers as well, such as a
SSN and credit card information, and those words appear on the screen of
identity thieves? Have a read on this identify theft victims story and then
tell me that Miguel or any other kook on your list deserves a similar fate?
What if the "words on a screen" are a complete fabrication and appear the
the screen of your employer, or if you're self employeed, potential
customers.

Words on a screen can have real life impact, and to categorically label
someone as a kook because he/she writes on usenet what he would like to do
in real life, is absurd. IMHO, the fact that Miguel has been busting the
balls and trolling kookologist with great succes is the only reason that
he's been nominated for one of your infantile awards.

John, as usual, I agree with your analysis completely. Unfortunately,
the sick freaks who populate AUK probably aren't going to credit the
word of a usenet newbie such as you.

Miguel

On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:04:36 -0700, miguel did the cha-cha, and screamed:

You have no idea of the extent to which Steve Chaney has taken matters to
RL over the past 12 years wrt me, and you have no idea of the extent to
which his raging insanity has caused him to make unspeakably nasty claims
about my children and my grandchild.

BTW, all of that **** from Steve was foam, and you ought to have just
totted up your Usenet Valhalla points. Instead, you went to K00k
Valhalla along with Steve.

--
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Hail Eris! TM#5; COOSN-029-06-71069
Cardinal Snarky of the Fannish Inquisition

Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/

AUK FAQ: http://www.caballista.org/auk/faq.html

WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, February 2007
Message-ID: 1

WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, January 2007 MID:
70

"6. Who is a net.giggler?" -- Bloxy's "Monkay", that's who. Message-ID:


"'I find this genetic sequence all the way down the evolutionary
ladder,' he says. 'The major significance of this protein is that it may
be a communication line between the nucleus and the mitochondria.'" --
Andrew B. Chung, from
http://gtalumni.org/Publications/mag...n91/chung.html

"Pot...kettle...so black it picks cotton." -- But Alex "Dink" Cain isn't
racist at all, oh no. Not him. Why, some of his best friends are porch
monkeys. I'll bet. Message-ID:

"You think I don't know this? What gives you the right to speak as if
you have authority over me? You have none. I like his use of the words
'wanton woman'. They are biblical. Maybe there is some hope for k man
after all. You? There is no hope for you at all you freak of nature. Go
back to the hole you came out of." -- Atlanta Olympiada Kane "knows"
Kadaitcha Man was referring to me, but addressed him as though he was
referring to himself, then foamed all over me, in Message-ID:


"No effort at all c*cksucking you, b1tch." -- At last, the Monkey-man
comes out of the closet, in MID: aXkth.3535$QE6.1902@trnddc02

http://www6.kingdomofloathing.com/login.php

"This is a sandwich made by a Spam Witch. You know why Spam Witches
can't starve if they're at the beach? Because they can always eat the
sand which is there." -- Spam Witch sammich, from The Kingdom of
Loathing

http://www.runescape.com/
No one expects the Fannish Inquisition!
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Cabal_...y_Pretzel/join
Cabal of the Holy International Discordian Internet & Usenet Terrorist
Pretzel

"i have no need for sex; i'd rather tease you, honeybuns." -- Teh Mop
Jockey doesn't know the meaning of "TMI". MID:


"What are marijuana tablets?"

"When logic and proportion
Have fallen softly dead
And the White Knight is talking backwards
And the Red Queen's 'off with her head!'
Remember what the dormouse said:
'Feed your head
Feed your head
Feed your head'"
-- "White Rabbit", Jefferson Airplane

I own "James C Cracked is God!!!":
MID: .com

"Chips on you dud, you got bugged for being near me, Viruses transmit
that way you know." -- Blooey: Master of the Autoflame. Message-ID:


"The nonsense screeds you compose and post to usenet lack any kind of
coherent and rational meaning whatsoever, and are composed of random
bits and pieces stolen from mythology, science fiction, religion, comic
books, etc., placed into a blender, and the switch turned to the highest
setting.
About every other screed has droppings of death threats, racial
bigotry, laughably false prophesies of gloom and doom, and inane
attempts to extort money. These bland, meaningless, pulpy messes are
then trowled into usenet; identical or nearly identical screeds are
repeated ad nauseum." -- Art Deco had to clean up bits of Warhol for
days after using the Hammer on him

"Q: How many Bush administration officials does it take to change a
light bulb?
A: None. There is no need to change anything. We made the right decision
to stick with that light bulb. People who say that it is burned out are
giving aid and encouragement to the Forces of Darkness." -- Anon.

"Outlaw amateur assassins!" -- Chiun

"Property is theft."
-- P. J. Proudhon
"Property is liberty."
-- P. J. Proudhon
"Property is impossible."
-- P. J. Proudhon

"Etymology:
Argumentum ad Septicus : argument to putrefaction. Derived from Septicum
Argumentum : putrefaction of argument.

"Septic \Sep"tic\, Septical \Sep"tic*al\
a. [L. septicus to make putrid: cf. F. septique.]
Having power to promote putrefaction. Of or relating to or
caused by putrefaction." -- Kadaitcha Man, indirectly to
Donald "Skeptic"/"Septic" Alford, in MID:

"I never fail to be amazing" -- Looney Maroon for September 2006 nominee
William Barwell's ego knows no bounds. MID:


"Red meat won't hurt you. Fuzzy, blue-green meat will."
-- Zog the etc., in alt.discordia (correct
as needed)

"may you live to whatever age you'd like to." -- Dave Hillstrom,
in alt.discordia

"We are most nearly ourselves when we achieve the seriousness of the
child at play." -- Heraclitus

"And thats another mistake on your part. Your 'playing' games on usenet,
and I'm not playing...It has nothing to do with impressing you, it has
more to do with making sure you have the education you'll need to debate.
The debate is no fun for me if you are mentally incapable of it. I'm
giving you an opportunity to educate yourself. That's all." -- A trashy
former virus-writer turned Outer Filth doesn't know if he's playing or
working, in MID: om

"I am incapable of original thoughts" -- Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ has an honest
moment, in MID:

"But now the end is near. Now Mark Foley comes along and is making
almost all liberal dreams come true and seriously, I'm sorry for it.
See, I believe in karma. I believe what comes around goes around and I
know full well that it's just bad juju to wish such a level of turmoil
and ill upon other humans, warmongering gay-hating maladroits or no, and
that the real path of enlightenment is paved with forgiveness and
progress and white-hot love and turning the other cheek and scotch.

"In fact, Jesus said something about that, I do believe. He said, "Knock
it off already with the warmongering and the hating of each other and
let's all get some wine and party like it's 2012." Then again, he never
saw Karl Rove stab the nation with the dull ice pick of bogus fear. He
never heard George W. Bush describe brutal war and the death of tens of
thousands as "just a comma" in world history.

"Check that. Maybe I'm not so sorry after all." -- Mark Morford,
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cg...ve/2006/10/11/
notes101106.DTL&nl=fix
http://tinyurl.com/kusmr

"The Original Demon Prince of Absurdity"
wrote in message
news
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:04:36 -0700, miguel did the cha-cha, and
screamed:

You have no idea of the extent to which Steve Chaney has taken
matters to RL over the past 12 years wrt me, and you have no idea of
the extent to which his raging insanity has caused him to make
unspeakably nasty claims about my children and my grandchild.

BTW, all of that **** from Steve was foam, and you ought to have just
totted up your Usenet Valhalla points. Instead, you went to K00k
Valhalla along with Steve.

His /auk/ Valhalla points, don't you mean?

auk is not the usenet police, right? And it doesn't set the standards
for other groups, right? soc.singles seems to have an entirely different
culture from auk, Snarky. Are you saying that auk's rules still apply?

Further, I take note that Chaney carries Mike's name and address around
in his sig. Is that just foam too?

I'm not inclined to try to untangle a decade and a half of history for a
single newsgroup. I just don't have the time. But Chaney has given me a
creepy feeling since the first time I read one of his posts, so I think
I'll go with that when it comes to assessing who is right and who is
wrong in this.

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk

Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is
willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay

On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 09:38:05 -0400, Rhonda Lea Kirk attempted to confuse
the issue further by squeaking:
"The Original Demon Prince of Absurdity" wrote
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:04:36 -0700, miguel did the cha-cha, and
screamed:

You have no idea of the extent to which Steve Chaney has taken matters
to RL over the past 12 years wrt me, and you have no idea of the extent
to which his raging insanity has caused him to make unspeakably nasty
claims about my children and my grandchild.

BTW, all of that **** from Steve was foam, and you ought to have just
totted up your Usenet Valhalla points. Instead, you went to K00k
Valhalla along with Steve.

His /auk/ Valhalla points, don't you mean?

"Usenet Valhalla" points, aka "UV" points. Collectable all over usenet!

auk is not the usenet police, right? And it doesn't set the standards for
other groups, right? soc.singles seems to have an entirely different
culture from auk, Snarky. Are you saying that auk's rules still apply?

No, I'm saying his actions are his, and k00ky behaviour is k00ky -- I'm
not blaming soc.singles for his assholery. AUK is an anarchy. No cops
here.

Further, I take note that Chaney carries Mike's name and address around in
his sig. Is that just foam too?

Yep. Chaney's a textbook k00k, Cranston's a minor k00k.

I'm not inclined to try to untangle a decade and a half of history for a
single newsgroup. I just don't have the time. But Chaney has given me a
creepy feeling since the first time I read one of his posts, so I think
I'll go with that when it comes to assessing who is right and who is wrong
in this.

Make no mistake, I think Stevie's k00ky as hell, but Mikey's not exactly
all there, either.

--
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; COOSN-029-06-71069
The God of Odd Statements, the Ugliest Pig****er In The Universe
Stupidity Takes Its Toll. Please Have Exact Change.
Remove all the confusion and k00ks from my posting addy to send me your
sekrit messages.

Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/

AUK FAQ: http://www.caballista.org/auk/faq.html

WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, February 2007
Message-ID: 1

"You are the GOD-DAMNED, IGNORANT LIAR here.
Now, that is not me taking the Lord's name in vain."
-- John Wentzky: Living proof of the Death of Irony, in Message-ID:


I mourned:
The Mop Jockey did most oddly state:
DUDE, YOU WIN TEH INTERNETS!!!

the oversized check is in the mail.

Alas, all I get for my trouble is a Monkey that's trained to hurl ****
under several of my nyms.

"DevMcKinHole, you also get the pleasure of sucking off my doggy and
cleaning out his butthole with your tongue." -- He's not so much a
*Porch*Monkey as a _Fire_Monkey, as in one who's on fire due to his
own tendency to mess with lighter fluid while standing beside a hot
stove. Message-ID: 77Uxh.1996$384.1135@trnddc05

Said I:
You, Monkey-man, are quite possibly the only usenetter in existence
who does not and cannot own Hatter.

"[...] What's the matter fagboi, am I beating your as$ so badly that
you're no seeking an alliance with the diaperboi?...YOu really don't
know how dumb you are, do ya?" -- I guess I don't, Monkey.
Message-ID: gHVIh.1760$Bi2.1639@trnddc01

"Ok, but I am not stalking Teh Mop Jockey, I seem to be building a
relationship with him. Remember, I am a Christian so the secular rules
do not apply to me. I strive to be amoral, which I think applies to this
situation. Keep this in mind, please. Since I am currently mentally ill
and since I can not nominate, that is what I am doing at this time." --
Olympiada: Teh amoral "Christian", in Message-ID:


"You're like some kind of rabid attack-gerbil." -- Lionel Lauer to Joxer
in MID:

"I say you are out of your ****ing mind." -- Ying Guo, posting as
"SameAsB4" , tells PorchMonkey4Life, posting
as the same nick but a slightly different morph, the score, in MID:


"in the holy spirit i know you would satisfy every single person in a
room if you were the only person present." -- ~tanya, to Crazy Andy II,
in MID: . com

If you never read anything else in any of my sigs, read this:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15321167/
http://borealin.livejournal.com/15104.html
Or watch it he
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqxmPjB0WSs
Then, if you manage to read/watch all that, try this:
http://www.newamericancentury.org/Re...asDefenses.pdf
And Molly Ivins had a few choice words to say about it, weeks befo
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/092906B.shtml
Here's Chris Floyd: Fatal Vision: The Deeper Evil Behind the Detainee
Bill: http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/100206A.shtml

"Q: What's the difference between the Vietnam War and the Iraq War?
A: George W. Bush had a plan to get out of the Vietnam War." -- Anon.

Thread where outing begins: http://tinyurl.com/hojf8
George Pickett Memorial Trophy, Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart,
and the Order of the Holey Sockpuppet winner on
outing personal contact info in x-poasted subject lines:
"Plenty of people post under their real names and do not attempt to hide
their contact info. You are scared of being 'outed' because you are a
pathological abuser of usenet, and people rightly despise you for it.
You're afraid of being reported to the authorities or, better, visited
by a couple of guys with baseball bats. Other people don't have this
obsessive fear. Ward Hardman himself has posted plenty of personal
information - nothing that anyone else added was hidden in any way.
You're so ****ing scared you've built up this whole sick mythology about
different categories of bad dudes who 'out' scum like you.

"Meanwhile you are the ugliest pig****er in the universe. You are the
coward without ethics. You call me a 'newbie' - ha! what an asshole you
are. Those who want to remain anonymous do so. There is absolutely no
way you could identify me, not unless you had the sort of subpoena power
that only gets turned on for big-time terrorists. That's because I chose
to be anonymous. Some people don't. Only really stupid dicks like you
choose the sort of semi-anonymity which leaves you in constant fear.

"What a dickless wonder you are 'Snarky' you fat asshole."
-- in MID: . com

"I am the only one who has outer filthed Ward" -- James C. "Crackhead"
Cracked voluntarily self-immolates, in MID:


"When I told Abbie Hoffman that he was the first one who made me laugh
since Lenny Bruce died, Hoffman said, "Really? He was my god." The
combination of satirical irreverence and sense of justice that Bruce and
Hoffman shared was the real spirit behind the Yippies--a term I coined
to describe a phenomenon that already existed: an organic coalition of
stoned hippies and political activists who engaged in such actions as
throwing money on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, then
explaining to reporters the meaning of that symbolism. Folksinger Phil
Ochs summed it up: "A demonstration should turn you on, not turn you
off." So when journalists link the Yippies with misleading bedfellows,
at best it's careless shorthand; at worst it's deliberate demonization.
Osama bin Laden wanted an aircraft to crash into the Pentagon. Abbie
Hoffman merely wanted to levitate it." -- Paul Krassner,
http://tinyurl.com/ehu3v

The Original Demon Prince of ****stain wrote:
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:04:36 -0700, miguel did the cha-cha, and screamed:

You have no idea of the extent to which Steve Chaney has taken matters to
RL over the past 12 years wrt me, and you have no idea of the extent to
which his raging insanity has caused him to make unspeakably nasty claims
about my children and my grandchild.

BTW, all of that **** from Steve was foam, and you ought to have just
totted up your Usenet Valhalla points. Instead, you went to K00k
Valhalla along with Steve.

Since you are unaware of all that Steve wrote, your opinion about this
is as useless as your employment prospects, gimp.

miguel

In article ,
miguel wrote:
Sean Monaghan wrote:
miguel wrote in
:

Kali wrote:
miguel said:
: Kadaitcha Gimp Retard He-Bitch wrote:
: Translation: even though all kookologists agree that taking usenet
: to real life is prime kooksign, that's what I'm trying to
: accomplish.
: Good job there kOOk.
: miguel
So, what are your plans for Steve Cheney?
If I ever meet him, I will put him in the hospital.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^

This is not a flame; this is a clear threat of physical violence. This
is something we'd expect from Richard "the St00pid" Bullis, or from
Edmond Heinz Wollmann - not the words of a 'marginal kook', or from
someone who is merely involved in a Usenet flamewar.

Sean, Kali recently stated that she was considered the most reasonable
and judicious of the kookologists. If by that she is contrasting herself
with you, K-Bitch and ****stain, you can imagine the difficulty I or
anybody else might have in giving her any points for that claim.

You have no idea of the extent to which Steve Chaney has taken matters
to RL over the past 12 years wrt me, and you have no idea of the extent
to which his raging insanity has caused him to make unspeakably nasty
claims about my children and my grandchild.

Charlotte, on the other hand, does.

Yep.

(But did he ever go after your son? Steve tends to go after girls,
especially minor girls, and babies, not fit adult males .)

If you have any questions about
whether Chaney deserves to have his ass kicked, feel free to direct them
to her.

I can't support the "put him in the hospital", even though you, I, and
everyone reading here, including Wonderbra himself, knows that it will
never happen, because Steve tucks his tail and runs for his Fort Machismo
bunker when he gets called on his ****. Has for decades. For
kookologists, Seattle is Steebe's Front Street Gym, his P. F. Chang's.

Steve chickened out repeatedly on me offering to stand him a snack at La
Bou (local wonderful Viet-French bakery) when I was in town, and
I'm Ms. Mild-Mannered Sysadmin Church Lady and was within a local phone
call at the time. And unlike Mike (who is a strong man in physically excellent
shape), it would be fairly tricky for me to do him physical harm, even
were I not in a fully public location and a Nice Lady (tm) to boot.
Steve's met me, and he knows that. Definitely "Delicious Crab Wontons".
(If you're ever in Sac'to, it's all good at La Bou; I'm especially fond
of the ham and cheese croissants.)

Remember that this is the same Steve Chaney who just stalked a usenet
opponent's uninvolved-in-the-argument minor daughter over Myspace, filed a
police report IRL, and published the opponent's uninvolved-in-the-argument
ex-spouse's name and place of employment. Who has been bringing
off-usenet Real Life stuff in years after the relevant parties have
made up with each other. This stuff has happened before,
folks, and has happened repeatedly over the years that I've known him.

And who has done a lot of crap in the "taking it to real life" or
"threatening to take it to real life" - posting addresses (Mike's
included - and, yes, it happened first and had RL consequences), trying to
get police/authorities involved (remember his ludicrous claims that I'm
an embezzler?), trying to screw with peoples' livelihoods, claiming to drive
by his opponents' (note the plural) houses, online and offline (that's
Real Life) harassment of opponents' (note the plural again) children and
grandchildren. Making things up out of thin air. Hiring PIs and search
firms to get information on people who are living their own lives without
him. Having meltdowns when his behaviour is pointed out to him.

Think Chuckles, folks. Although I don't know if Chuckles ever claimed to
poison a dog. That's our Steebie.

I don't spot him particular "UPA" (note scare quotes) points for getting
Migs and Jeem and a few other people riled up by the foul things he pulled
with their kids. I think that most (sane) parents would be as fierce,
although they might express themselves in different ways. I've seen Mike
and Jeem with their kids, and they're great dads. I survived some major
deep **** that happened to me when I was around the age of those girls
because *my* dad, who I still adore wildly, had my back. So I've been on
the "other side" of that kind of bond. It kept me alive so I'm inclined
to cut slack . In other words, it's probably not how I would have
handled it, but I can see where it's coming from.

Steve knows that Mike can give it up. He told me so, live, in
person. Mike's given it up (for times). But Steve likes the attention.
Steve will escalate in increasingly kooky and pathetic ways if he's not
getting enough attention, as all kookologists, both old timer and recent,
should be perfectly well aware of by now.

Charlotte



--

On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 02:42:36 +0000 (UTC),
(Charlotte L. Blackmer) wrote:

Remember that this is the same Steve Chaney who just stalked a usenet
opponent's uninvolved-in-the-argument minor daughter over Myspace, filed a
police report IRL, and published the opponent's uninvolved-in-the-argument
ex-spouse's name and place of employment. Who has been bringing
off-usenet Real Life stuff in years after the relevant parties have
made up with each other. This stuff has happened before,
folks, and has happened repeatedly over the years that I've known him.

my daughter is now afraid to go to target and wonders if the security
guys are watching her. No it not that she's ever shoplifted. It's
that she thinks steve said something to make them think she did.

It's the **** teens say to each other online a ha ha. NO one takes it
serious. she googled her name to see what it was about couldn't
believe it.

So yes, what steve did scared her and of her friends. She called her
dad to talk about it. Now she had to make all of her posts on myspace
private and her friends had to do it as well since stevie will stalk
them in order to read what my daughter posted. If that's not RL'ing
against a 16 year what the **** is?