|
*Ping* Trippy - Bobo Pool submission { PING Rhonda... [threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}}
"Rhonda Lea Kirk" post-humping my nominations
again, wrote in : "Sean Monaghan" wrote in message miguel wrote in : Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology, wrote: miguel said: Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology (http://oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psych...culty/barnard/) wrote: miguel said: Dumbarse Git wrote: miguel: Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside: You bitched about KM repeating your purported occupation (which you admit to in another thread), You're a liar. I've never bitched about KM repeating my occupation. I see you caught your attribution error in your post to Dumbarse Git. If I may make a suggestion, perhaps you should wipe the froth and spittle from your screen before hitting the "send" key. yet it falls within your code of ethics to post the (alleged) institution and precise location of someone else. I'm reading a lecture on ethics from Sean Monaghan, who moments ago said that it's all about the entertainment. Will somebody please nominate you for some steaming pile of hypocrisy award? I'm beginning to think that your intellectual prowess is about the equivalent of ****stain's, which would be your only defense to said award. If Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology is going to associate my name and occupation with the word "dog****er," given that she stated she has no trouble with somebody's name being associated with their posts on usenet, then where's the problem? Of course, all she needs to do to avoid this is cease her participation in the google stacking. If you are her friend, you might think about stopping yourself. Thank you for this very telling campaign speech. You are a dolt. In part, though, she has you to thank for this, what with the fanboi page you did for me. ****stain, too. If you all want to stop the RL stuff, I'm happy to stop too. Your choice. The question is - will your public defender find this behaviour to be acceptable, or will that person continue to rationalise on your behalf? It's sad that you dismiss it as rationalization. Please do continue to defend this nasty, filthy creature, and let him drag you into the pits of hell as you become his unwitting proxy in his kooky mission against AUK. I'm sorry, I've tried to be reasonable for your sake. But it's way past pillory time for him - he's been at this a lot longer than I had realized. Intelligent, non-kooky people don't parade their kookiness in AUK, or take baseball bats to wasp's nests. Is this your professional opinion, Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, http//oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psychology/faculty/barnard/ Now feel free to call me a hypocrite and any nominating or voting I do for him "revenge" motivated. I call it making entertainment out of a bully. And really, I am sorry about all this, as it probably does affect our friendship (miguel has no respect for it, in case you hadn't noticed). All I can do today is shake my head at your defense of him and wish you'd stop. I miss the days when I could anonymously play the dozens with people on usenet, in soc.singles, on AUK, in AFA-B, without having asshole kooks like you, Dumbarse Git Sean, K-Bitch and ****stain get all my identifying information out front and center, and in a way that will cause reputational and commercial damage to me. Perhaps soon you may miss those days too. You didn't care when the rest of them started in on me. In fact you decided to join in. So solly. Threat noted. I hope so. If you stop, and if you can persuade your friends, who are, frighteningly, even less rational than you, to stop, I'll be happy to pull the plug on this as well. The nerd gimp retard fagbois hold the keys to the kingdom, Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology. Wow. Extortion attempt. No. It's negotiation: Everyone stops. The problem is, you give every indication of holding the belief that you should be able to continue what you started and that Mike has no right to attempt to mitigate his damages. Equity is for everyone, Sean. Are you *really* this thick?!?!? Why, pray tell, would the fact that I made an informative Kook-FAQ about the ****wit make it acceptable (to you) for him to post a link to *Kali's* alleged workplace? Hello - Kali and I are not the same person. Yo, Moonbeam - we[TINW] have a new submission for the Bobo pool. Pleace to consider this frothing maniac for odds. Thanks in advance. http://www.alcatroll.com/sean/miguel -- Official FAQ for Alt.Usenet.Kooks: http://www.caballista.org/auk COOSN-266-06-58907 Hammer of Thor - August 2005 Pierre Salinger Memorial "Hook, Line & Sinker" awards - March 2005, July 2005, August 2005, August 2006, February 2007 [Co]Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler |
PING Rhonda... [threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
K. A. Cannon wrote in
: On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 00:38:17 +0000 (UTC), Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote: Kali wrote in m: In , miguel mjc101 @gmail.com said: : Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department : of Psychology : (http://oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psych...culty/barnard/) wrote: : miguel said: : Dumbarse Git wrote: : miguel: : : Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside: : : You bitched about KM repeating your purported occupation (which : you admit to in another thread), : : You're a liar. I've never bitched about KM repeating my : occupation. : : I see you caught your attribution error in your post to Dumbarse : Git. If I may make a suggestion, perhaps you should wipe the froth : and spittle from your screen before hitting the "send" key. : : yet it falls within your code of ethics to post the : (alleged) institution and precise location of someone else. : : I'm reading a lecture on ethics from Sean Monaghan, who moments : ago said that it's all about the entertainment. Will somebody : please nominate you for some steaming pile of hypocrisy award? : I'm beginning to think that your intellectual prowess is about : the equivalent of ****stain's, which would be your only defense : to said award. : : If Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, : Department of Psychology is going to associate my name and : occupation with the word "dog****er," given that she stated she : has no trouble with somebody's name being associated with their : posts on usenet, then where's the problem? Of course, all she : needs to do to avoid this is cease her participation in the : google stacking. If you are her friend, you might think about : stopping yourself. : : Thank you for this very telling campaign speech. : : You are a dolt. In part, though, she has you to thank for this, : what with the fanboi page you did for me. ****stain, too. If you : all want to stop the RL stuff, I'm happy to stop too. Your : choice. : : The question is - will your public defender find this behaviour : to be acceptable, or will that person continue to rationalise : on your behalf? : : It's sad that you dismiss it as rationalization. : : Please do continue to defend this nasty, filthy creature, and : let him drag you into the pits of hell as you become his : unwitting proxy in his kooky mission against AUK. I'm sorry, : I've tried to be reasonable for your sake. But it's way past : pillory time for him - he's been at this a lot longer than I had : realized. Intelligent, non-kooky people don't parade their : kookiness in AUK, or take baseball bats to wasp's nests. : : Is this your professional opinion, Kimberly K. Barnard, University : of Wisconsin-Parkside, : http://oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psych...culty/barnard/ : : Now feel free to call me a hypocrite and any nominating or : voting I do for him "revenge" motivated. I call it making : entertainment out of a bully. : : And really, I am sorry about all this, as it probably does : affect our friendship (miguel has no respect for it, in case you : hadn't noticed). All I can do today is shake my head at your : defense of him and wish you'd stop. : : I miss the days when I could anonymously play the dozens with : people on usenet, in soc.singles, on AUK, in AFA-B, without having : asshole kooks like you, Dumbarse Git Sean, K-Bitch and ****stain : get all my identifying information out front and center, and in a : way that will cause reputational and commercial damage to me. : : Perhaps soon you may miss those days too. : : You didn't care when the rest of them started in on me. In fact you : decided to join in. So solly. : : miguel Threat noted. Maybe Cranston would like to threaten me next? I'm only working about two miles from the little dweeb. Ahem...it is a Usenet tradition that I be threatened first. Yeah? You forgot to tell Foamboi. Maybe he can make his threats to me personally too!! Tell the nutless ****wit you're female. It brings out the bestest k00ky threats in mikey. Scare me, mikey! add me to ur lits mikey!! Day-yum, I hace been teh litsiest! Thanks for reminding moi! |
*Ping* Trippy - Bobo Pool submission { PING Rhonda... [threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}}
"Sean Monaghan" wrote in message
"Rhonda Lea Kirk" post-humping my nominations again, wrote in : "Sean Monaghan" wrote in message miguel wrote in : Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology, wrote: miguel said: Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology (http://oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psych...culty/barnard/) wrote: miguel said: Dumbarse Git wrote: miguel: Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside: You bitched about KM repeating your purported occupation (which you admit to in another thread), You're a liar. I've never bitched about KM repeating my occupation. I see you caught your attribution error in your post to Dumbarse Git. If I may make a suggestion, perhaps you should wipe the froth and spittle from your screen before hitting the "send" key. yet it falls within your code of ethics to post the (alleged) institution and precise location of someone else. I'm reading a lecture on ethics from Sean Monaghan, who moments ago said that it's all about the entertainment. Will somebody please nominate you for some steaming pile of hypocrisy award? I'm beginning to think that your intellectual prowess is about the equivalent of ****stain's, which would be your only defense to said award. If Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology is going to associate my name and occupation with the word "dog****er," given that she stated she has no trouble with somebody's name being associated with their posts on usenet, then where's the problem? Of course, all she needs to do to avoid this is cease her participation in the google stacking. If you are her friend, you might think about stopping yourself. Thank you for this very telling campaign speech. You are a dolt. In part, though, she has you to thank for this, what with the fanboi page you did for me. ****stain, too. If you all want to stop the RL stuff, I'm happy to stop too. Your choice. The question is - will your public defender find this behaviour to be acceptable, or will that person continue to rationalise on your behalf? It's sad that you dismiss it as rationalization. Please do continue to defend this nasty, filthy creature, and let him drag you into the pits of hell as you become his unwitting proxy in his kooky mission against AUK. I'm sorry, I've tried to be reasonable for your sake. But it's way past pillory time for him - he's been at this a lot longer than I had realized. Intelligent, non-kooky people don't parade their kookiness in AUK, or take baseball bats to wasp's nests. Is this your professional opinion, Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, http//oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psychology/faculty/barnard/ Now feel free to call me a hypocrite and any nominating or voting I do for him "revenge" motivated. I call it making entertainment out of a bully. And really, I am sorry about all this, as it probably does affect our friendship (miguel has no respect for it, in case you hadn't noticed). All I can do today is shake my head at your defense of him and wish you'd stop. I miss the days when I could anonymously play the dozens with people on usenet, in soc.singles, on AUK, in AFA-B, without having asshole kooks like you, Dumbarse Git Sean, K-Bitch and ****stain get all my identifying information out front and center, and in a way that will cause reputational and commercial damage to me. Perhaps soon you may miss those days too. You didn't care when the rest of them started in on me. In fact you decided to join in. So solly. Threat noted. I hope so. If you stop, and if you can persuade your friends, who are, frighteningly, even less rational than you, to stop, I'll be happy to pull the plug on this as well. The nerd gimp retard fagbois hold the keys to the kingdom, Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology. Wow. Extortion attempt. No. It's negotiation: Everyone stops. The problem is, you give every indication of holding the belief that you should be able to continue what you started and that Mike has no right to attempt to mitigate his damages. Equity is for everyone, Sean. Are you *really* this thick?!?!? Would that be another one of those abusive ad homs? Why, pray tell, would the fact that I made an informative Kook-FAQ about the ****wit make it acceptable (to you) for him to post a link to *Kali's* alleged workplace? Bzzzt. http://www.fallacyfiles.org/index.html Go find it yourself. I've got better things to do than to play "name the fallacy." My NPD ex-husband used to try to tie me up in knots with faulty logic. I thought I loved him, so it never occurred to me to cut him off at the knees. I don't even think I love you. Hello - Kali and I are not the same person. laughing It would be pretty ****ing funny if you were. Yo, Moonbeam - we[TINW] have a new submission for the Bobo pool. Pleace to consider this frothing maniac for odds. Thanks in advance. http://www.alcatroll.com/sean/miguel -- Rhonda Lea Kirk Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay |
[threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
"Sean Monaghan" wrote in message
"Rhonda Lea Kirk" wrote in : "Kali" wrote in message In , Rhonda Lea Kirk said: "Kali" wrote in message In , miguel mjc101 @gmail.com said: Dumbarse Git wrote: miguel: Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside: You bitched about KM repeating your purported occupation (which you admit to in another thread), yet it falls within your code of ethics to post the (alleged) institution and precise location of someone else. I'm reading a lecture on ethics from Sean Monaghan, who moments ago said that it's all about the entertainment. Will somebody please nominate you for some steaming pile of hypocrisy award? I'm beginning to think that your intellectual prowess is about the equivalent of ****stain's, which would be your only defense to said award. If Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology is going to associate my name and occupation with the word "dog****er," given that she stated she has no trouble with somebody's name being associated with their posts on usenet, then where's the problem? Of course, all she needs to do to avoid this is cease her participation in the google stacking. If you are her friend, you might think about stopping yourself. Thank you for this very telling campaign speech. You are a dolt. In part, though, she has you to thank for this, what with the fanboi page you did for me. ****stain, too. If you all want to stop the RL stuff, I'm happy to stop too. Your choice. The question is - will your public defender find this behaviour to be acceptable, or will that person continue to rationalise on your behalf? It's sad that you dismiss it as rationalization. miguel I didn't mention your full name or your occupation (let alone your work location), you filthy kook. You have serious reading comprehension problems. I've explained my position on this very well, and I maintain that position. I merely cited an example to make a point. You, being the kooky bully you are, saw a threat in it and decided you were going to do the same thing, only turn it up a notch. That's what narcissistic kooks do. The more you write, the kookier you seem. You're so bent on your kooky mission that you're willing to drag Rhonda through hell for it. Say what you want, and have Rhonda try to defend you, but kooky is as kooky does. This post is just another example. He's not responsible for my choices. His transparent manipulation of you aside... He was a friend to me when I was being batted around like a cat toy, and auk was giving out an undeserved Salinger for a troll that did me a lot of emotional damage. Are you familiar with the history of how the Salinger HL&S got its name? Would you imagine that some people's feelings were hurt when they heard about the 'crash'? I think so. That's the nature of the award. Sean, I addressed this specifically to Kali, who actually has sufficient information to understand the reference I was making. You don't have that information, so your comment is irrelevant. He has not withdrawn his friendship even though I was quite critical of him with regard to his initial flaming of you. This is not about his 'flaming'; this is about him being a kook. And that has nothing to do with my comment, so what's your point? Everything he has done with regard to /me/ has been done to my benefit and advantage. If that's manipulation, I want more of it. You can be sure that I have given careful consideration to all the consequences of the position I've taken. More important to me than any single person or group of people in this dogfight is whether I will be able to look myself in the mirror when I'm done. Yes, I know this to be true about you. Dustin (remember him?) had too little faith in my ability to keep his confidence when I refused to choose between him and KMonster. In the face of his direct attack on me, I defended myself, but up to that point, most of what I said was in Dustin's favor, because in my opinion, the tactics being used on him weren't fair or right. It's not like I'm not consistent, Kali. If I had to bend myself like a pretzel over this, I wouldn't do it. Loyalty to a friend is keeping confidences and offering support in hard times, not defending the indefensible. We agree. -- Rhonda Lea Kirk Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay |
^
v
|
PING Rhonda... [threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:47:21 -0700, miguel wrote:
Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote: miguel: Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology, wrote: miguel said: Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology (http://oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psych...culty/barnard/) wrote: miguel said: Dumbarse Git wrote: miguel: Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside: You bitched about KM repeating your purported occupation (which you admit to in another thread), You're a liar. I've never bitched about KM repeating my occupation. I see you caught your attribution error in your post to Dumbarse Git. If I may make a suggestion, perhaps you should wipe the froth and spittle from your screen before hitting the "send" key. yet it falls within your code of ethics to post the (alleged) institution and precise location of someone else. I'm reading a lecture on ethics from Sean Monaghan, who moments ago said that it's all about the entertainment. Will somebody please nominate you for some steaming pile of hypocrisy award? I'm beginning to think that your intellectual prowess is about the equivalent of ****stain's, which would be your only defense to said award. If Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of Psychology is going to associate my name and occupation with the word "dog****er," given that she stated she has no trouble with somebody's name being associated with their posts on usenet, then where's the problem? Of course, all she needs to do to avoid this is cease her participation in the google stacking. If you are her friend, you might think about stopping yourself. Thank you for this very telling campaign speech. You are a dolt. In part, though, she has you to thank for this, what with the fanboi page you did for me. ****stain, too. If you all want to stop the RL stuff, I'm happy to stop too. Your choice. The question is - will your public defender find this behaviour to be acceptable, or will that person continue to rationalise on your behalf? It's sad that you dismiss it as rationalization. Please do continue to defend this nasty, filthy creature, and let him drag you into the pits of hell as you become his unwitting proxy in his kooky mission against AUK. I'm sorry, I've tried to be reasonable for your sake. But it's way past pillory time for him - he's been at this a lot longer than I had realized. Intelligent, non-kooky people don't parade their kookiness in AUK, or take baseball bats to wasp's nests. Is this your professional opinion, Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, http//oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psychology/faculty/barnard/ Now feel free to call me a hypocrite and any nominating or voting I do for him "revenge" motivated. I call it making entertainment out of a bully. And really, I am sorry about all this, as it probably does affect our friendship (miguel has no respect for it, in case you hadn't noticed). All I can do today is shake my head at your defense of him and wish you'd stop. I miss the days when I could anonymously play the dozens with people on usenet, in soc.singles, on AUK, in AFA-B, without having asshole kooks like you, Dumbarse Git Sean, K-Bitch and ****stain get all my identifying information out front and center, and in a way that will cause reputational and commercial damage to me. Perhaps soon you may miss those days too. You didn't care when the rest of them started in on me. In fact you decided to join in. So solly. Threat noted. I hope so. If you stop, and if you can persuade your friends[slap!] **** off, you little coward. You like threatening women, wimp? I'll bet it compensates for the testosterone shots you don't get anymore, nadless. Look at the nerd gimp retard fagboi puff his chest! Snork...it certainly is enlightening how much your rather sad attempts at insults give away your bigotry and your inner demons. miguel, bite my nuts klunt Find some nuts first you simpering coward. -- K. A. Cannon kcannon at insurgent dot org (change the orgy to org to reply) Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow in Australia. -Charles Schultz |
PING Rhonda... [threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 00:38:17 +0000 (UTC), Cujo DeSockpuppet
wrote: Kali wrote in : In , miguel mjc101 @gmail.com said: : Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Department of : Psychology : (http://oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psych...culty/barnard/) wrote: : miguel said: : Dumbarse Git wrote: : miguel: : : Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside: : : You bitched about KM repeating your purported occupation (which : you admit to in another thread), : : You're a liar. I've never bitched about KM repeating my : occupation. : : I see you caught your attribution error in your post to Dumbarse Git. : If I may make a suggestion, perhaps you should wipe the froth and : spittle from your screen before hitting the "send" key. : : yet it falls within your code of ethics to post the : (alleged) institution and precise location of someone else. : : I'm reading a lecture on ethics from Sean Monaghan, who moments : ago said that it's all about the entertainment. Will somebody : please nominate you for some steaming pile of hypocrisy award? I'm : beginning to think that your intellectual prowess is about the : equivalent of ****stain's, which would be your only defense to : said award. : : If Kimberly K. Barnard, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, : Department of Psychology is going to associate my name and : occupation with the word "dog****er," given that she stated she : has no trouble with somebody's name being associated with their : posts on usenet, then where's the problem? Of course, all she : needs to do to avoid this is cease her participation in the google : stacking. If you are her friend, you might think about stopping : yourself. : : Thank you for this very telling campaign speech. : : You are a dolt. In part, though, she has you to thank for this, : what with the fanboi page you did for me. ****stain, too. If you : all want to stop the RL stuff, I'm happy to stop too. Your choice. : : The question is - will your public defender find this behaviour : to be acceptable, or will that person continue to rationalise on : your behalf? : : It's sad that you dismiss it as rationalization. : : Please do continue to defend this nasty, filthy creature, and : let him drag you into the pits of hell as you become his : unwitting proxy in his kooky mission against AUK. I'm sorry, : I've tried to be reasonable for your sake. But it's way past : pillory time for him - he's been at this a lot longer than I had : realized. Intelligent, non-kooky people don't parade their : kookiness in AUK, or take baseball bats to wasp's nests. : : Is this your professional opinion, Kimberly K. Barnard, University of : Wisconsin-Parkside, : http://oldweb.uwp.edu/academic/psych...culty/barnard/ : : Now feel free to call me a hypocrite and any nominating or : voting I do for him "revenge" motivated. I call it making : entertainment out of a bully. : : And really, I am sorry about all this, as it probably does : affect our friendship (miguel has no respect for it, in case you : hadn't noticed). All I can do today is shake my head at your : defense of him and wish you'd stop. : : I miss the days when I could anonymously play the dozens with people : on usenet, in soc.singles, on AUK, in AFA-B, without having asshole : kooks like you, Dumbarse Git Sean, K-Bitch and ****stain get all my : identifying information out front and center, and in a way that will : cause reputational and commercial damage to me. : : Perhaps soon you may miss those days too. : : You didn't care when the rest of them started in on me. In fact you : decided to join in. So solly. : : miguel Threat noted. Maybe Cranston would like to threaten me next? I'm only working about two miles from the little dweeb. Ahem...it is a Usenet tradition that I be threatened first. Maybe he can make his threats to me personally too!! Scare me, mikey! add me to ur lits mikey!! -- K. A. Cannon kcannon at insurgent dot org (change the orgy to org to reply) Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow in Australia. -Charles Schultz |
Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
..
|
.
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:01 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com