Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
 

Demon Lord of Confusion
ballista.org wrote:
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 10:58:51 -0600, Art Deco attempted to confuse the
issue further by squeaking:
Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
Kali wrote:
Art Deco said:
:Cardinal Snarky of the Fannish Inquisition wrote:
:On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 19:07:50 -0600, Art Deco sat in thee Comfee
:Chaire, and didst finally confess, after taking Muche Tea:
:miguel wrote:
:
:In th
:
:Shuttup, Cranston.
:Shuttup, Cranston.
:Shuttup, Cranston.
Shuttup, Cranston.
Shuttup, Cranston.
Shuttup, Cranston.
Shuttup, Cranston.
Shuttup, Cranston.

--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco

"To err is human, to cover it up is Weasel" -- Dogbert

[threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 {NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
 

Respondant wrote:
Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:

snip

It was a very fragile situation. I cannot even begin to describe the
trouble it caused me.

What say you, Snarky?

For what award should I nominate the responsible kook?

Rhonda? As much as I despise writing this, I agree with Meat Plow. :-) You
really should (re)consider dropping this altogether. I know you've said
you're inclined to see it through, (for reasons I'm not aware of, and don't
care to know) but to what end? What good can possibly come of it?

Why is it in her best interests to drop it?

PS. The wife and I are still willing to buy ya a drink if ya ever find
yourself down in the Toms River/Seaside area.

Maybe Rhonda and I will be dating by then, and you can buy me one too,
you stupid ****.

miguel

[threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
 

miguel wrote:

Respondant wrote:
Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:

snip

It was a very fragile situation. I cannot even begin to describe the
trouble it caused me.

What say you, Snarky?

For what award should I nominate the responsible kook?

Rhonda? As much as I despise writing this, I agree with Meat Plow.
:-) You really should (re)consider dropping this altogether. I
know you've said you're inclined to see it through, (for reasons I'm
not aware of, and don't care to know) but to what end? What good
can possibly come of it?

Why is it in her best interests to drop it?

I never said it was. I said she might (re)consider dropping it. That's
all. And I stand by it. As I'm sure you are well aware, Rhonda is free to
do what she damn well pleases.

PS. The wife and I are still willing to buy ya a drink if ya ever
find yourself down in the Toms River/Seaside area.

Maybe Rhonda and I will be dating by then, and you can buy me one too,
you stupid ****.

Sure. Why not? Maybe you'll even call me a stupid **** to my face?

Now THAT would be intersesting.

Bill

[threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 {NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
 

Respondant wrote:
miguel wrote:

Respondant wrote:
Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
snip

It was a very fragile situation. I cannot even begin to describe the
trouble it caused me.
What say you, Snarky?
For what award should I nominate the responsible kook?
Rhonda? As much as I despise writing this, I agree with Meat Plow.
:-) You really should (re)consider dropping this altogether. I
know you've said you're inclined to see it through, (for reasons I'm
not aware of, and don't care to know) but to what end? What good
can possibly come of it?
Why is it in her best interests to drop it?

I never said it was. I said she might (re)consider dropping it. That's
all. And I stand by it. As I'm sure you are well aware, Rhonda is free to
do what she damn well pleases.

If you have a suggestion for her, you must have some reason to believe
it's in her best interests to follow your suggestion. You wouldn't just
make some suggestion randomly, would you?

C'mon. Let's hear why in your opinion it's best for her to drop it.

PS. The wife and I are still willing to buy ya a drink if ya ever
find yourself down in the Toms River/Seaside area.
Maybe Rhonda and I will be dating by then, and you can buy me one too,
you stupid ****.

Sure. Why not? Maybe you'll even call me a stupid **** to my face?

Now THAT would be intersesting.

Well, let's hope I get a chance someday then.

miguel

[threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
 

"Respondant" wrote in message

miguel wrote:

Respondant wrote:
Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:

snip

It was a very fragile situation. I cannot even begin to describe
the trouble it caused me.

What say you, Snarky?

For what award should I nominate the responsible kook?

Rhonda? As much as I despise writing this, I agree with Meat Plow.
:-) You really should (re)consider dropping this altogether. I
know you've said you're inclined to see it through, (for reasons I'm
not aware of, and don't care to know) but to what end? What good
can possibly come of it?

Why is it in her best interests to drop it?

I never said it was. I said she might (re)consider dropping it.

You said I /really should/, not that I might.

That's all. And I stand by it. As I'm sure you are well aware,
Rhonda is free to do what she damn well pleases.

See below.

PS. The wife and I are still willing to buy ya a drink if ya ever
find yourself down in the Toms River/Seaside area.

Maybe Rhonda and I will be dating by then, and you can buy me one
too, you stupid ****.

Sure. Why not? Maybe you'll even call me a stupid **** to my face?

And maybe you'll even call me a **** to my face?

Now THAT would be intersesting.

I think MY idea is more interesting.

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk

Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is
willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay

[threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
 

miguel wrote:

Respondant wrote:
miguel wrote:

Respondant wrote:
Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
snip

It was a very fragile situation. I cannot even begin to describe
the trouble it caused me.
What say you, Snarky?
For what award should I nominate the responsible kook?
Rhonda? As much as I despise writing this, I agree with Meat Plow.
:-) You really should (re)consider dropping this altogether. I
know you've said you're inclined to see it through, (for reasons
I'm not aware of, and don't care to know) but to what end? What
good can possibly come of it?
Why is it in her best interests to drop it?

I never said it was. I said she might (re)consider dropping it. That's
all. And I stand by it. As I'm sure you are well aware,
Rhonda is free to do what she damn well pleases.

If you have a suggestion for her, you must have some reason to believe
it's in her best interests to follow your suggestion. You wouldn't
just make some suggestion randomly, would you?

I might.

C'mon. Let's hear why in your opinion it's best for her to drop it.

She's already stated that she hates being in the middle of a mess between
people she likes. (That would include, you) So I don't think it's all that
far-fetched for me to ask her to (re)consider bowing out (which she also
hinted at a while ago) so as to *retain* her friendships with all concerned.

PS. The wife and I are still willing to buy ya a drink if ya ever
find yourself down in the Toms River/Seaside area.

Maybe Rhonda and I will be dating by then, and you can buy me one
too, you stupid ****.

Sure. Why not? Maybe you'll even call me a stupid **** to my face?

Now THAT would be intersesting.

Well, let's hope I get a chance someday then.

Let's both hope that. And let's hope if you say it to my face, you say it
in "fun". K?

Bill

[threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 {NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
 

Respondant wrote:
miguel wrote:
Respondant wrote:
miguel wrote:
Respondant wrote:
Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
snip

It was a very fragile situation. I cannot even begin to describe
the trouble it caused me.
What say you, Snarky?
For what award should I nominate the responsible kook?
Rhonda? As much as I despise writing this, I agree with Meat Plow.
:-) You really should (re)consider dropping this altogether. I
know you've said you're inclined to see it through, (for reasons
I'm not aware of, and don't care to know) but to what end? What
good can possibly come of it?
Why is it in her best interests to drop it?
I never said it was. I said she might (re)consider dropping it. That's
all. And I stand by it. As I'm sure you are well aware,
Rhonda is free to do what she damn well pleases.
If you have a suggestion for her, you must have some reason to believe
it's in her best interests to follow your suggestion. You wouldn't
just make some suggestion randomly, would you?

I might.

C'mon. Let's hear why in your opinion it's best for her to drop it.

She's already stated that she hates being in the middle of a mess between
people she likes. (That would include, you) So I don't think it's all that
far-fetched for me to ask her to (re)consider bowing out (which she also
hinted at a while ago) so as to *retain* her friendships with all concerned.

That's fair. Thanks.

PS. The wife and I are still willing to buy ya a drink if ya ever
find yourself down in the Toms River/Seaside area.

Maybe Rhonda and I will be dating by then, and you can buy me one
too, you stupid ****.
Sure. Why not? Maybe you'll even call me a stupid **** to my face?
Now THAT would be intersesting.
Well, let's hope I get a chance someday then.

Let's both hope that. And let's hope if you say it to my face, you say it
in "fun". K?

That probably won't happen, since you created that fangroup for me.

miguel

[threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
 

"miguel" wrote in message

Respondant wrote:
miguel wrote:
Respondant wrote:
miguel wrote:
Respondant wrote:
Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
snip

It was a very fragile situation. I cannot even begin to describe
the trouble it caused me.
What say you, Snarky?
For what award should I nominate the responsible kook?
Rhonda? As much as I despise writing this, I agree with Meat
Plow. :-) You really should (re)consider dropping this
altogether. I know you've said you're inclined to see it
through, (for reasons I'm not aware of, and don't care to know)
but to what end? What good can possibly come of it?
Why is it in her best interests to drop it?
I never said it was. I said she might (re)consider dropping it.
That's all. And I stand by it. As I'm sure you are well aware,
Rhonda is free to do what she damn well pleases.
If you have a suggestion for her, you must have some reason to
believe it's in her best interests to follow your suggestion. You
wouldn't just make some suggestion randomly, would you?

I might.

C'mon. Let's hear why in your opinion it's best for her to drop it.

She's already stated that she hates being in the middle of a mess
between people she likes. (That would include, you) So I don't
think it's all that far-fetched for me to ask her to (re)consider
bowing out (which she also hinted at a while ago) so as to *retain*
her friendships with all concerned.

That's fair. Thanks.

PS. The wife and I are still willing to buy ya a drink if ya
ever find yourself down in the Toms River/Seaside area.

Maybe Rhonda and I will be dating by then, and you can buy me one
too, you stupid ****.
Sure. Why not? Maybe you'll even call me a stupid **** to my
face? Now THAT would be intersesting.
Well, let's hope I get a chance someday then.

Let's both hope that. And let's hope if you say it to my face, you
say it in "fun". K?

That probably won't happen, since you created that fangroup for me.

Different Bill, I think.

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk

Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is
willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay

[threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
 

Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:

"Respondant" wrote in message

miguel wrote:

Respondant wrote:
Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:

snip

It was a very fragile situation. I cannot even begin to describe
the trouble it caused me.

What say you, Snarky?

For what award should I nominate the responsible kook?

Rhonda? As much as I despise writing this, I agree with Meat Plow.
:-) You really should (re)consider dropping this altogether. I
know you've said you're inclined to see it through, (for reasons
I'm not aware of, and don't care to know) but to what end? What
good can possibly come of it?

Why is it in her best interests to drop it?

I never said it was. I said she might (re)consider dropping it.

You said I /really should/, not that I might.

I sit corrected. My bad.

That's all. And I stand by it. As I'm sure you are well aware,
Rhonda is free to do what she damn well pleases.

See below.

PS. The wife and I are still willing to buy ya a drink if ya ever
find yourself down in the Toms River/Seaside area.

Maybe Rhonda and I will be dating by then, and you can buy me one
too, you stupid ****.

Sure. Why not? Maybe you'll even call me a stupid **** to my face?

And maybe you'll even call me a **** to my face?

I'd have to know you a really LONG time, (or DESPISE you) before I'd use
that particular word if you were even within earshot. I have more respect
for woman than to say something like that. I get the feeling you remember
me from a while ago since you brought up the "****" thing. And I know it
****ed you off, and I apologized for it, but you would have none of it.
I've been married nearly 25 years Rhonda, to the love of my life. And yes,
she absolutely abhors that word ... But sometimes it's fun to just poke her
with it for reactions sake. That's all.

Now THAT would be intersesting.

I think MY idea is more interesting.

Would you *like* me to call both you and my wife "****s" over a beer? I'm
pretty sure as long as the wife knows it's coming ahead of time, I can get
away with it. :-)

Sheesh.

[threat] Nomination - "Miguel" for Bullis Foam Duck #27 { NOMINATION -- Kadaitcha Man for Hammer of Thor}
 

Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:

"miguel" wrote in message

Respondant wrote:
miguel wrote:
Respondant wrote:
miguel wrote:
Respondant wrote:
Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
snip

It was a very fragile situation. I cannot even begin to
describe the trouble it caused me.
What say you, Snarky?
For what award should I nominate the responsible kook?
Rhonda? As much as I despise writing this, I agree with Meat
Plow. :-) You really should (re)consider dropping this
altogether. I know you've said you're inclined to see it
through, (for reasons I'm not aware of, and don't care to know)
but to what end? What good can possibly come of it?
Why is it in her best interests to drop it?
I never said it was. I said she might (re)consider dropping it.
That's all. And I stand by it. As I'm sure you are well aware,
Rhonda is free to do what she damn well pleases.
If you have a suggestion for her, you must have some reason to
believe it's in her best interests to follow your suggestion. You
wouldn't just make some suggestion randomly, would you?

I might.

C'mon. Let's hear why in your opinion it's best for her to drop it.

She's already stated that she hates being in the middle of a mess
between people she likes. (That would include, you) So I don't
think it's all that far-fetched for me to ask her to (re)consider
bowing out (which she also hinted at a while ago) so as to *retain*
her friendships with all concerned.

That's fair. Thanks.

PS. The wife and I are still willing to buy ya a drink if ya
ever find yourself down in the Toms River/Seaside area.

Maybe Rhonda and I will be dating by then, and you can buy me one
too, you stupid ****.
Sure. Why not? Maybe you'll even call me a stupid **** to my
face? Now THAT would be intersesting.
Well, let's hope I get a chance someday then.

Let's both hope that. And let's hope if you say it to my face, you
say it in "fun". K?

That probably won't happen, since you created that fangroup for me.

Different Bill, I think.

You'd be correct.