LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
posted to alt.sailing.asa
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,109
Default Ronald Reagan Freedom Square

Capt. JG wrote:
"Mundo" wrote in message
. net...

On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 14:46:50 -0500, katy wrote
(in article ):


Capt. JG wrote:

"katy" wrote in message
...


Capt. JG wrote:


"Maxprop" wrote in message
arthlink.net...



"Capt. JG" wrote in message



Wrong about what? There are typically no corporate rules about
dating a
co-worker, boss, or subordinate. It might not be a good idea, but
it's
not against the law.

Most sexual harassment suits aren't matters of criminal codes. They
are
civil suits.




If there are such rules, they're hard to enforce.

Enforcement is irrelevant. If the secretary sues the boss after
being
dumped, she generally wins. We're talking civil suits, not criminal
trials.


Perjury is perjury.




Sometimes the result is messy and sometimes the result is a lawsuit,
but
that isn't the norm. Lots of people meet each other at work. I know
a
couple that share a job. They work in the same office. I know
another
couple who were boss/employee. It didn't workout, but no one sued.
This
really sounds like corporate or gov't intrusion into people's
personal
lives. I say it's none of their business unless it crosses the line
into
quid pro quo.

No one is intruding in anyone's business. It's a matter of civil
litigation, Jon. Not lawbreaking. You have a tough time with that
distinction, don't you?


So, which is it... should Clinton have been in civil court or criminal
court?



Civil for the sexual harrassment issues and criminal for the lying
about
it...he perjured himself...that's criminal...



And, compared to what Bush lied about, you think that's about the same
level, right?



I didn't know Bush lied in a court of law...didn't know he had been
brought up on charges...it has not been proven that Bush lied...it has
been proven that Clinton lied...when Bush is tried and prosecuted for
lying, that would be a different situation...but that hasn't
happened...and won't happen...and until; then, if you are an upholder of
the Constitution, you must proceed as if he were innocent...give it a
rest...


Katy,
Even Bush has admitted he was wrong/ spin for lying. Maybe it is time to
get
on with the reality. I hate to be the one to break it to you. Is it 2008
yet?

--
Mundo, The Captain who is a bully and an ass




Katy won't believe it. Neither will Max. They believe he just couldn't have
lied.

No..I believe that we do not know the whole story and that Pelosi's
dropping the whole thing is very telling. I believe that he has the
right, like every other American, to be proven innocent or guity and not
tried on the streets...I do not like GW Bush..I don't like the war...but
I do stand by the Constitution and its ability to do what it is supposed
to do...and that's the only way to say qualitatively or quantitatively
that he lied. Jon Ganz saying so doesn't cut it,because after all, all
Jon Ganz is is some computer geek on Usenet like the rest of us...so
call your representative and your Senator, get up a petition, and see
what happens. AThen we'll talk.
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OT Reagan Legacy in Perspective basskisser General 27 June 14th 04 12:34 PM
OT Bush is certainly no Reagan basskisser General 0 June 8th 04 03:53 PM
( OT) Ronald Reagan R.I.P (But in perspective) Jim General 11 June 7th 04 04:13 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:49 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017