Capt. JG wrote:
"katy" wrote in message
...

Capt. JG wrote:

"katy" wrote in message
...


Capt. JG wrote:


"katy" wrote in message
...



Capt. JG wrote:



"Maxprop" wrote in message
rthlink.net...




"Capt. JG" wrote in message





He lied about a consenual affair between two adults.

President of the United States and a youthful intern. This would be
sexual harassment of the most grievous kind.


It would be if she wasn't interested or felt pressure. It was her idea
I believe.

Wrongwtongwtong...that's quid pro quo sexual harassment ...if they had

been peers at work then it would have been a consenting adult situation
where the worplace rules (and I'm sure the Federal Government rules
state that secual activity on the job is a fireable offense) would take
over. In quid pro quo events, though, it does not matter who starts it.
It is implied that because one person is in a position of power that
that supercedes anything else and causes a situation where the other
may not be able to control what happens. The on;y reason Clinton didn't
get nailed for that was because Monica did not pursue that avenue and
there was no supervisor to investigate. His staff, though, were bound
by law that if they knew it was going on, to report it to someone, I
suspect the Judiciary in this case, and to investigate. There is no
such thing as consenting secual acts in the workplace between an
superior and employees.



I have a great idea! We should impeach him. Oh wait, that happened and
during the trial in the Senate, Clinton was more popular than Bush now.
So, please compare and contrast how Bush's lies are in any way the equal
of Clinton's lie about a blow job. For heaven's sake, let's not impeach
him or Cheney for the lies. That would be wrong, wrong, wrong.



Were they lies? Or were they mislead by the Pentagon or CIA? You have
the definitive answer for that? There's been a trial or hearing that has
decided that? I thought the American way was to pronounce innocence
until proven guilty...what court of law has decided that? Or have they
appointed you a Supreme Court Justice and we just haven't heard about it?
I'm not SAYING i LIKE THE WAR. i'M NOT Aying I like Bush. But your
auppositions are based on the media and not on proven fact..yet...So..if
you want to hold on to those veliefs, you'd better be calling for
impeachment so that your OPINIONS are validated. Until then, all you can
say us "I think Bush lied" You cannot say "Bush lied". You don't have
that power as a citizen.



Sorry to tell you, but a trial is supposed to discover the facts and
bring the guilty party to justice or set the not guilty free. I'm asking
for a trial. Clinton got one.

I can say Bush lied, because I believe it to be the case. There is a lot
of smoke pointing to both him and Cheney lying. Sure from the media...
like all the major books written about it... from well-respected authors.
You're saying they've all been mislead, that the facts don't add up. Have
you read any of them?

FYI, I am calling for impeachment, and I'm sorry Pelosi "took it off the
table."


If Pelosi, who hates his guts, took it off the table, there must ve some
underlying facts that she has become privy to since her acceptance as
Speaker...maybe you should trust your own party leaders?



Sorry, but I'm not a democrat. Perhap Pelosi took it off the table for the
good of the country? Oh wait, she's a democrat, so that can't be.


The good of the country? I don't think so..if he is truly culpable for
all those crimes then he should be brought to trial just like anyone
else...that would be fore the good of the country..to realize that our
leaders cannot hide behind their Office...