"katy" wrote in message
...
Capt. JG wrote:
"katy" wrote in message
...

Capt. JG wrote:

"katy" wrote in message
...


And Clinton! g


And that time they were correct!



The best pres we've had in a long time.


Get real...he was adequate at best and a sorry excise of a man...



I guess all those years of prosperity and relative peace just couldn't
have been so good for you.

No..they weren't good for me at all...Steelcase went down the tubes,
...the town north of us in MI, greenville, lost its major sources of
income and became a ghost town of sorts...prosperity was reserved for
isplated areas of the country..fortunate for you that CA was included..
He was more popular, if that's any judge, during and
after his impeachment for lying about a blow job than Bush is... the
worst polling numbers since Nixon.

Now that just goes to show you how warped the nation has become that
someone would be more popular because of their sexual prowess that for
their contributions as Presidnet...he was mediocre at best...



You're dreaming. You cite a couple of examples, claim that's the true
measure of a president, then claim all has been rosey under the current
screwed up administration. Clinton was one of the best presidents we've had
in a long time. Bush is by far the worst. But, feel free to keep saying it
isn't so.


--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com