| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
Who are you gonna listen to?
Capt. JG wrote:
"katy" wrote in message ... Capt. JG wrote: "katy" wrote in message ... Capt. JG wrote: "katy" wrote in message ... scbafreak via BoatKB.com wrote: Or, god forbid, he's actually being honest unlike Cheney who wasn't born with that ability. U'm not a particular fan of either GW or Cheney so it doens't make any difference to me...or for that matter, Bill Clinton..I'm gonna jump on the Ralph Nader bandwagon... Well, that really was just a vote for the Bushco crowd last time. No it was a vote for Nader. What is with Democrats saying that they didn't so much lose to Bush as get screwed bby Nader. If the Dems could have gotten a good strong candidate then they would have won the election. Instead they choose these non-threatening kind of wussy little guys. Americans don't like that. Americans like tough guys. As much of an Environmentalist as I am I could not bring myself to vote for Kerry. He is too much of a giant "V" for me. I don't think I am alone in this thinking. Democrats like that sort of guy and so I will never be a Democrat. What we really need to do is ditch the 2 party system...I say go back to a Parliament...with a Prime minister rather than a President...gets rid of the whole popular vite vs electoral college vote dillema and makes it so that other opinions can be heard in government..also allows for the common man to have a chance to stand for his cimmunity...we'd have to ditch the House of Lords concept and keep the Senate intact but change the way the House functions.. I don't think I like this idea... you're right about the 2-party system... we just need reasonable 3rd party candidates... Nader wasn't one, and in my opinion it was a throw-away vote. I don't know if it would have made a difference in the last pres. election, but it didn't help and look who we got. I voted for Kerry/Edwards, but was never highly impressed with Kerry. The lesser of two evils was my reasoning. However, now we have a chance to vote for Hillary or McCain. I don't think Obama is quite ready yet... another 8 years, then.... g I don't like McCain..he'a an angry person and tires to rule by intimidation...I do like Giuliani...if you can make sense out of that hash called New York, you can make sewnse out of almost anything...as much as I would like to see a woman in the WHite House, as President and not as bed wench, Hillary just deosn't do it for me...I like listening to er and think she is an intelligent person and on the private sector, if we met I would probably like her..i do not like her politics, though...I liked Joe Lieberman before they made a mess of him but this country would never vote for a Jew for President...and at this point, that would just inflame the Arabs to the point of total uncontrol...Edwards is too much in the hands of money...the guy I really liked won't run...Mark Warner... She's very middle of the road these days and very pro-military. I never liked Liberman, and I thought Gore made a mistake picking him as a running mate. He's too much of a follower in his politics. "these days"...that's my problem with her..she waffles... As opposed to Bush? As opposed to Lieberman who ran on Gore's liberal ticket? Almost all politicians waffle. Like I've said before, I am not a fan of GW Bish...Gore needed Liebermann on his ticket becasue he (Gore) is so liberal that moderate Dems needed something to convince them of the ticket...it wasn't enough and look what happened..Gore is way, way too liberal.... |
|
#2
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
|
Who are you gonna listen to?
"katy" wrote in message
... Capt. JG wrote: "katy" wrote in message ... Capt. JG wrote: "katy" wrote in message ... Capt. JG wrote: "katy" wrote in message ... scbafreak via BoatKB.com wrote: Or, god forbid, he's actually being honest unlike Cheney who wasn't born with that ability. U'm not a particular fan of either GW or Cheney so it doens't make any difference to me...or for that matter, Bill Clinton..I'm gonna jump on the Ralph Nader bandwagon... Well, that really was just a vote for the Bushco crowd last time. No it was a vote for Nader. What is with Democrats saying that they didn't so much lose to Bush as get screwed bby Nader. If the Dems could have gotten a good strong candidate then they would have won the election. Instead they choose these non-threatening kind of wussy little guys. Americans don't like that. Americans like tough guys. As much of an Environmentalist as I am I could not bring myself to vote for Kerry. He is too much of a giant "V" for me. I don't think I am alone in this thinking. Democrats like that sort of guy and so I will never be a Democrat. What we really need to do is ditch the 2 party system...I say go back to a Parliament...with a Prime minister rather than a President...gets rid of the whole popular vite vs electoral college vote dillema and makes it so that other opinions can be heard in government..also allows for the common man to have a chance to stand for his cimmunity...we'd have to ditch the House of Lords concept and keep the Senate intact but change the way the House functions.. I don't think I like this idea... you're right about the 2-party system... we just need reasonable 3rd party candidates... Nader wasn't one, and in my opinion it was a throw-away vote. I don't know if it would have made a difference in the last pres. election, but it didn't help and look who we got. I voted for Kerry/Edwards, but was never highly impressed with Kerry. The lesser of two evils was my reasoning. However, now we have a chance to vote for Hillary or McCain. I don't think Obama is quite ready yet... another 8 years, then.... g I don't like McCain..he'a an angry person and tires to rule by intimidation...I do like Giuliani...if you can make sense out of that hash called New York, you can make sewnse out of almost anything...as much as I would like to see a woman in the WHite House, as President and not as bed wench, Hillary just deosn't do it for me...I like listening to er and think she is an intelligent person and on the private sector, if we met I would probably like her..i do not like her politics, though...I liked Joe Lieberman before they made a mess of him but this country would never vote for a Jew for President...and at this point, that would just inflame the Arabs to the point of total uncontrol...Edwards is too much in the hands of money...the guy I really liked won't run...Mark Warner... She's very middle of the road these days and very pro-military. I never liked Liberman, and I thought Gore made a mistake picking him as a running mate. He's too much of a follower in his politics. "these days"...that's my problem with her..she waffles... As opposed to Bush? As opposed to Lieberman who ran on Gore's liberal ticket? Almost all politicians waffle. Like I've said before, I am not a fan of GW Bish...Gore needed Liebermann on his ticket becasue he (Gore) is so liberal that moderate Dems needed something to convince them of the ticket...it wasn't enough and look what happened..Gore is way, way too liberal.... Not for me... and, if the Supremes hadn't installed Bush, we wouldn't be spending $100s of billions in Iraq, we would be safer, and the world would be better off. I'll take liberal any day of what has transpired. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
|
#3
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
|
Who are you gonna listen to?
Capt. JG wrote:
"katy" wrote in message ... Capt. JG wrote: "katy" wrote in message ... Capt. JG wrote: "katy" wrote in message ... Capt. JG wrote: "katy" wrote in message .. . scbafreak via BoatKB.com wrote: Or, god forbid, he's actually being honest unlike Cheney who wasn't born with that ability. U'm not a particular fan of either GW or Cheney so it doens't make any difference to me...or for that matter, Bill Clinton..I'm gonna jump on the Ralph Nader bandwagon... Well, that really was just a vote for the Bushco crowd last time. No it was a vote for Nader. What is with Democrats saying that they didn't so much lose to Bush as get screwed bby Nader. If the Dems could have gotten a good strong candidate then they would have won the election. Instead they choose these non-threatening kind of wussy little guys. Americans don't like that. Americans like tough guys. As much of an Environmentalist as I am I could not bring myself to vote for Kerry. He is too much of a giant "V" for me. I don't think I am alone in this thinking. Democrats like that sort of guy and so I will never be a Democrat. What we really need to do is ditch the 2 party system...I say go back to a Parliament...with a Prime minister rather than a President...gets rid of the whole popular vite vs electoral college vote dillema and makes it so that other opinions can be heard in government..also allows for the common man to have a chance to stand for his cimmunity...we'd have to ditch the House of Lords concept and keep the Senate intact but change the way the House functions.. I don't think I like this idea... you're right about the 2-party system... we just need reasonable 3rd party candidates... Nader wasn't one, and in my opinion it was a throw-away vote. I don't know if it would have made a difference in the last pres. election, but it didn't help and look who we got. I voted for Kerry/Edwards, but was never highly impressed with Kerry. The lesser of two evils was my reasoning. However, now we have a chance to vote for Hillary or McCain. I don't think Obama is quite ready yet... another 8 years, then.... g I don't like McCain..he'a an angry person and tires to rule by intimidation...I do like Giuliani...if you can make sense out of that hash called New York, you can make sewnse out of almost anything...as much as I would like to see a woman in the WHite House, as President and not as bed wench, Hillary just deosn't do it for me...I like listening to er and think she is an intelligent person and on the private sector, if we met I would probably like her..i do not like her politics, though...I liked Joe Lieberman before they made a mess of him but this country would never vote for a Jew for President...and at this point, that would just inflame the Arabs to the point of total uncontrol...Edwards is too much in the hands of money...the guy I really liked won't run...Mark Warner... She's very middle of the road these days and very pro-military. I never liked Liberman, and I thought Gore made a mistake picking him as a running mate. He's too much of a follower in his politics. "these days"...that's my problem with her..she waffles... As opposed to Bush? As opposed to Lieberman who ran on Gore's liberal ticket? Almost all politicians waffle. Like I've said before, I am not a fan of GW Bish...Gore needed Liebermann on his ticket becasue he (Gore) is so liberal that moderate Dems needed something to convince them of the ticket...it wasn't enough and look what happened..Gore is way, way too liberal.... Not for me... and, if the Supremes hadn't installed Bush, we wouldn't be spending $100s of billions in Iraq, we would be safer, and the world would be better off. I'll take liberal any day of what has transpired. And besides the World Trade Center, the capitol building, the US Postal Service, the SuperDome, the Statue of Liberty, and Amtrak would no longer exist and we'd all have anthrax or worse... |
|
#4
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
|
Who are you gonna listen to?
"katy" wrote in message
... Capt. JG wrote: "katy" wrote in message ... Capt. JG wrote: "katy" wrote in message ... Capt. JG wrote: "katy" wrote in message ... Capt. JG wrote: "katy" wrote in message . .. scbafreak via BoatKB.com wrote: Or, god forbid, he's actually being honest unlike Cheney who wasn't born with that ability. U'm not a particular fan of either GW or Cheney so it doens't make any difference to me...or for that matter, Bill Clinton..I'm gonna jump on the Ralph Nader bandwagon... Well, that really was just a vote for the Bushco crowd last time. No it was a vote for Nader. What is with Democrats saying that they didn't so much lose to Bush as get screwed bby Nader. If the Dems could have gotten a good strong candidate then they would have won the election. Instead they choose these non-threatening kind of wussy little guys. Americans don't like that. Americans like tough guys. As much of an Environmentalist as I am I could not bring myself to vote for Kerry. He is too much of a giant "V" for me. I don't think I am alone in this thinking. Democrats like that sort of guy and so I will never be a Democrat. What we really need to do is ditch the 2 party system...I say go back to a Parliament...with a Prime minister rather than a President...gets rid of the whole popular vite vs electoral college vote dillema and makes it so that other opinions can be heard in government..also allows for the common man to have a chance to stand for his cimmunity...we'd have to ditch the House of Lords concept and keep the Senate intact but change the way the House functions.. I don't think I like this idea... you're right about the 2-party system... we just need reasonable 3rd party candidates... Nader wasn't one, and in my opinion it was a throw-away vote. I don't know if it would have made a difference in the last pres. election, but it didn't help and look who we got. I voted for Kerry/Edwards, but was never highly impressed with Kerry. The lesser of two evils was my reasoning. However, now we have a chance to vote for Hillary or McCain. I don't think Obama is quite ready yet... another 8 years, then.... g I don't like McCain..he'a an angry person and tires to rule by intimidation...I do like Giuliani...if you can make sense out of that hash called New York, you can make sewnse out of almost anything...as much as I would like to see a woman in the WHite House, as President and not as bed wench, Hillary just deosn't do it for me...I like listening to er and think she is an intelligent person and on the private sector, if we met I would probably like her..i do not like her politics, though...I liked Joe Lieberman before they made a mess of him but this country would never vote for a Jew for President...and at this point, that would just inflame the Arabs to the point of total uncontrol...Edwards is too much in the hands of money...the guy I really liked won't run...Mark Warner... She's very middle of the road these days and very pro-military. I never liked Liberman, and I thought Gore made a mistake picking him as a running mate. He's too much of a follower in his politics. "these days"...that's my problem with her..she waffles... As opposed to Bush? As opposed to Lieberman who ran on Gore's liberal ticket? Almost all politicians waffle. Like I've said before, I am not a fan of GW Bish...Gore needed Liebermann on his ticket becasue he (Gore) is so liberal that moderate Dems needed something to convince them of the ticket...it wasn't enough and look what happened..Gore is way, way too liberal.... Not for me... and, if the Supremes hadn't installed Bush, we wouldn't be spending $100s of billions in Iraq, we would be safer, and the world would be better off. I'll take liberal any day of what has transpired. And besides the World Trade Center, the capitol building, the US Postal Service, the SuperDome, the Statue of Liberty, and Amtrak would no longer exist and we'd all have anthrax or worse... This was all on Bushco's watch... while he was on vacation probably. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
|
#5
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
|
Who are you gonna listen to?
Capt. JG wrote:
"katy" wrote in message ... Capt. JG wrote: "katy" wrote in message ... Capt. JG wrote: "katy" wrote in message ... Capt. JG wrote: "katy" wrote in message .. . Capt. JG wrote: "katy" wrote in message .. . scbafreak via BoatKB.com wrote: Or, god forbid, he's actually being honest unlike Cheney who wasn't born with that ability. U'm not a particular fan of either GW or Cheney so it doens't make any difference to me...or for that matter, Bill Clinton..I'm gonna jump on the Ralph Nader bandwagon... Well, that really was just a vote for the Bushco crowd last time. No it was a vote for Nader. What is with Democrats saying that they didn't so much lose to Bush as get screwed bby Nader. If the Dems could have gotten a good strong candidate then they would have won the election. Instead they choose these non-threatening kind of wussy little guys. Americans don't like that. Americans like tough guys. As much of an Environmentalist as I am I could not bring myself to vote for Kerry. He is too much of a giant "V" for me. I don't think I am alone in this thinking. Democrats like that sort of guy and so I will never be a Democrat. What we really need to do is ditch the 2 party system...I say go back to a Parliament...with a Prime minister rather than a President...gets rid of the whole popular vite vs electoral college vote dillema and makes it so that other opinions can be heard in government..also allows for the common man to have a chance to stand for his cimmunity...we'd have to ditch the House of Lords concept and keep the Senate intact but change the way the House functions.. I don't think I like this idea... you're right about the 2-party system... we just need reasonable 3rd party candidates... Nader wasn't one, and in my opinion it was a throw-away vote. I don't know if it would have made a difference in the last pres. election, but it didn't help and look who we got. I voted for Kerry/Edwards, but was never highly impressed with Kerry. The lesser of two evils was my reasoning. However, now we have a chance to vote for Hillary or McCain. I don't think Obama is quite ready yet... another 8 years, then.... g I don't like McCain..he'a an angry person and tires to rule by intimidation...I do like Giuliani...if you can make sense out of that hash called New York, you can make sewnse out of almost anything...as much as I would like to see a woman in the WHite House, as President and not as bed wench, Hillary just deosn't do it for me...I like listening to er and think she is an intelligent person and on the private sector, if we met I would probably like her..i do not like her politics, though...I liked Joe Lieberman before they made a mess of him but this country would never vote for a Jew for President...and at this point, that would just inflame the Arabs to the point of total uncontrol...Edwards is too much in the hands of money...the guy I really liked won't run...Mark Warner... She's very middle of the road these days and very pro-military. I never liked Liberman, and I thought Gore made a mistake picking him as a running mate. He's too much of a follower in his politics. "these days"...that's my problem with her..she waffles... As opposed to Bush? As opposed to Lieberman who ran on Gore's liberal ticket? Almost all politicians waffle. Like I've said before, I am not a fan of GW Bish...Gore needed Liebermann on his ticket becasue he (Gore) is so liberal that moderate Dems needed something to convince them of the ticket...it wasn't enough and look what happened..Gore is way, way too liberal.... Not for me... and, if the Supremes hadn't installed Bush, we wouldn't be spending $100s of billions in Iraq, we would be safer, and the world would be better off. I'll take liberal any day of what has transpired. And besides the World Trade Center, the capitol building, the US Postal Service, the SuperDome, the Statue of Liberty, and Amtrak would no longer exist and we'd all have anthrax or worse... This was all on Bushco's watch... while he was on vacation probably. N...it may have been tried on his watch but it didn't come to fruition, except for the Trade Center...if Gore had been President we'd probably all be bowing to the Mullah by now.. |
|
#6
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
|
Who are you gonna listen to?
"katy" wrote in message
... And besides the World Trade Center, the capitol building, the US Postal Service, the SuperDome, the Statue of Liberty, and Amtrak would no longer exist and we'd all have anthrax or worse... This was all on Bushco's watch... while he was on vacation probably. N...it may have been tried on his watch but it didn't come to fruition, except for the Trade Center...if Gore had been President we'd probably all be bowing to the Mullah by now.. Huh? All this happened while Bush slept. But, feel free to blame Gore. He did actually win the election. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
|
#7
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
|
Who are you gonna listen to?
Capt. JG wrote:
"katy" wrote in message ... And besides the World Trade Center, the capitol building, the US Postal Service, the SuperDome, the Statue of Liberty, and Amtrak would no longer exist and we'd all have anthrax or worse... This was all on Bushco's watch... while he was on vacation probably. N...it may have been tried on his watch but it didn't come to fruition, except for the Trade Center...if Gore had been President we'd probably all be bowing to the Mullah by now.. Huh? All this happened while Bush slept. But, feel free to blame Gore. He did actually win the election. No one won that election... |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Listen to VHF prior to departu | General | |||
| I'm gonna stop blaming | General | |||
| Actual sailing content has arrived. | ASA | |||
| Listen to me, Group -- I told you so -- Hurricane Isabel | ASA | |||
| Listen to the GOLD CUP - on the Net | Power Boat Racing | |||
Hybrid Mode
