"katy" wrote in message
...
Capt. JG wrote:
"katy" wrote in message
...


Or, god forbid, he's actually being honest unlike Cheney who wasn't born
with that ability.


U'm not a particular fan of either GW or Cheney so it doens't make any
difference to me...or for that matter, Bill Clinton..I'm gonna jump on
the Ralph Nader bandwagon...



Well, that really was just a vote for the Bushco crowd last time.


That's why I hope Giuliani gets the nomination...a vote for Nader is a
vote for Giuliani!


He's pro choice... I don't like him much for other reasons, and he has a lot
of baggage, but he's better than the current officeholder.
I know that's not saying much... g


--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

Capt. JG wrote:
"katy" wrote in message
...

Capt. JG wrote:

"katy" wrote in message
...



Or, god forbid, he's actually being honest unlike Cheney who wasn't born
with that ability.


U'm not a particular fan of either GW or Cheney so it doens't make any
difference to me...or for that matter, Bill Clinton..I'm gonna jump on
the Ralph Nader bandwagon...



Well, that really was just a vote for the Bushco crowd last time.


That's why I hope Giuliani gets the nomination...a vote for Nader is a
vote for Giuliani!



He's pro choice... I don't like him much for other reasons, and he has a lot
of baggage, but he's better than the current officeholder.
I know that's not saying much... g

I son't think you can use the pro choice thing as a sole criterion for
electing or not electing someone to the position of President. On a
state level, yes, because that's where the legislation is, but at the
top level, those decisions are already made...you have to look at whole
pictures, not at isolated instances...

"katy" wrote in message
...
Capt. JG wrote:
"katy" wrote in message
...

Capt. JG wrote:

"katy" wrote in message
...



Or, god forbid, he's actually being honest unlike Cheney who wasn't
born with that ability.


U'm not a particular fan of either GW or Cheney so it doens't make any
difference to me...or for that matter, Bill Clinton..I'm gonna jump on
the Ralph Nader bandwagon...



Well, that really was just a vote for the Bushco crowd last time.


That's why I hope Giuliani gets the nomination...a vote for Nader is a
vote for Giuliani!



He's pro choice... I don't like him much for other reasons, and he has a
lot of baggage, but he's better than the current officeholder.
I know that's not saying much... g

I son't think you can use the pro choice thing as a sole criterion for
electing or not electing someone to the position of President. On a state
level, yes, because that's where the legislation is, but at the top level,
those decisions are already made...you have to look at whole pictures, not
at isolated instances...



Can I look at how he treated his former wife? g


--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

Capt. JG wrote:
"katy" wrote in message
...

Capt. JG wrote:

"katy" wrote in message
...


Capt. JG wrote:


"katy" wrote in message
...




Or, god forbid, he's actually being honest unlike Cheney who wasn't
born with that ability.


U'm not a particular fan of either GW or Cheney so it doens't make any
difference to me...or for that matter, Bill Clinton..I'm gonna jump on
the Ralph Nader bandwagon...



Well, that really was just a vote for the Bushco crowd last time.


That's why I hope Giuliani gets the nomination...a vote for Nader is a
vote for Giuliani!



He's pro choice... I don't like him much for other reasons, and he has a
lot of baggage, but he's better than the current officeholder.
I know that's not saying much... g

I son't think you can use the pro choice thing as a sole criterion for
electing or not electing someone to the position of President. On a state
level, yes, because that's where the legislation is, but at the top level,
those decisions are already made...you have to look at whole pictures, not
at isolated instances...




Can I look at how he treated his former wife? g


Hillary throws ashtrays...Bill has sexual events with other
women....they're all human (to some extent...)...I'm sure that someone
can dig up something about almost anyone if they look hard enough...or
long enough...people do things they regret and then have to pay the
consequences years later..it's when they don't learn )Boll Boy) and
continue to make the same mistakes repeatedly is when the giant red X
should descend on them...

"katy" wrote in message
...

I son't think you can use the pro choice thing as a sole criterion for
electing or not electing someone to the position of President. On a
state level, yes, because that's where the legislation is, but at the top
level, those decisions are already made...you have to look at whole
pictures, not at isolated instances...




Can I look at how he treated his former wife? g


Hillary throws ashtrays...Bill has sexual events with other
women....they're all human (to some extent...)...I'm sure that someone can
dig up something about almost anyone if they look hard enough...or long
enough...people do things they regret and then have to pay the
consequences years later..it's when they don't learn )Boll Boy) and
continue to make the same mistakes repeatedly is when the giant red X
should descend on them...

Guilliani's one defining moment was during the 9/11 crisis. He also did a
pretty good job cleaning up NYC, but I don't see how anyone could think he's
got what it takes to be pres. I just don't see the bonafides. Perhaps others
do. I don't think he'll go very far in the political process, but you never
know.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

Capt. JG wrote:
"katy" wrote in message
...


I son't think you can use the pro choice thing as a sole criterion for
electing or not electing someone to the position of President. On a
state level, yes, because that's where the legislation is, but at the top
level, those decisions are already made...you have to look at whole
pictures, not at isolated instances...




Can I look at how he treated his former wife? g


Hillary throws ashtrays...Bill has sexual events with other
women....they're all human (to some extent...)...I'm sure that someone can
dig up something about almost anyone if they look hard enough...or long
enough...people do things they regret and then have to pay the
consequences years later..it's when they don't learn )Boll Boy) and
continue to make the same mistakes repeatedly is when the giant red X
should descend on them...


Guilliani's one defining moment was during the 9/11 crisis. He also did a
pretty good job cleaning up NYC, but I don't see how anyone could think he's
got what it takes to be pres. I just don't see the bonafides. Perhaps others
do. I don't think he'll go very far in the political process, but you never
know.

They said the same thing about Reagan...

"katy" wrote in message
...
Capt. JG wrote:
"katy" wrote in message
...


I son't think you can use the pro choice thing as a sole criterion for
electing or not electing someone to the position of President. On a
state level, yes, because that's where the legislation is, but at the
top level, those decisions are already made...you have to look at whole
pictures, not at isolated instances...




Can I look at how he treated his former wife? g


Hillary throws ashtrays...Bill has sexual events with other
women....they're all human (to some extent...)...I'm sure that someone
can dig up something about almost anyone if they look hard enough...or
long enough...people do things they regret and then have to pay the
consequences years later..it's when they don't learn )Boll Boy) and
continue to make the same mistakes repeatedly is when the giant red X
should descend on them...


Guilliani's one defining moment was during the 9/11 crisis. He also did a
pretty good job cleaning up NYC, but I don't see how anyone could think
he's got what it takes to be pres. I just don't see the bonafides.
Perhaps others do. I don't think he'll go very far in the political
process, but you never know.

They said the same thing about Reagan...


And Clinton! g


--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com