If he hit a potato (in the patch) it ripped off the bolted on keel
and he sunk in just a few seconds. On top of that he was tethered to
the boat and was pulled down with her. Thats my guess. With such light
winds he was motoring at full speed.

I don't think that C&C 40 _without_ a keel would sink all that fast.

Cheers
Marty


Neither do I. You'd have plenty of time and there would still be debris of
some kind... cushions, whatever.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com




Drug runners and real modern pirates , this may be a possibility



--
NH_/)_
www.sailirc.net

"sailirc" wrote in message
news:5uvwh.63726$uC6.1078@trnddc02...


If he hit a potato (in the patch) it ripped off the bolted on keel
and he sunk in just a few seconds. On top of that he was tethered to
the boat and was pulled down with her. Thats my guess. With such light
winds he was motoring at full speed.

I don't think that C&C 40 _without_ a keel would sink all that fast.

Cheers
Marty


Neither do I. You'd have plenty of time and there would still be debris
of some kind... cushions, whatever.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com




Drug runners and real modern pirates , this may be a possibility



--
NH_/)_
www.sailirc.net




Near SF??? No way, no how.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Joe" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Feb 1, 11:02 am, Charlie Morgan wrote:
On 1 Feb 2007 08:36:44 -0800, "Joe" wrote:





On Jan 31, 9:54 pm, "
wrote:
Bet it had a keel smile,

Hey Joe... what does that statement mean? As a layperson I'm just
not familiar with that term?

Just google "C&C smile". There is some sort of gasket between the cast
keel and the hull, with filler added.
When you see a C&C just hauled from the water you knowtice the flexing
causes a crack at the joint, when you look at the boat from the head
on the crack makes it looks as if it's smiling. Bobspirt had this
problem with the C&C he had.

Joe

Yeah, you REALLY know what you are talking about, Joe. Sheesh, what a
numb-nuts.

CWM- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I never said I was an expert dick breath.

I said to google it
http://groups.google.com/groups/sear...=Search+Groups

4,980 hit's on C&C smile
Let me guess you have a tender, cracking C&C right BB?

Joe



Smile or not, it wouldn't sink quickly. This isn't the answer.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

On Feb 1, 5:49 pm, Charlie Morgan wrote:
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 18:40:46 -0500, "Scotty" wrote:
BB's idea of wealthy is being able to eat at Dennys, instead
of McDonalds.

I have no way of knowing which is better. You really ought to get over the "BB"
thing. It only indicates a weakness in your own makeup and intellectual
capacity.

CWM

Why is that BB?, even the picture of your ugly mug, that you posted...
was titled BB.

Don't worry BB, just because you use to be a total dip**** asshole as
BB is no reason you can not change if you want to.

Joe

On Feb 1, 11:23 am, Martin Baxter wrote:
Joe wrote:

Well a 2'X8' hole in the bottom of most boats would sink them in a
matter of a few seconds. The C&C 40 has no type of foam floatation,
ect. I think it would go down like a rock. Not a bad looking boat, but
IMO a Pearson 40 is a better boat if you are looking for that type of
boat.

A 2' x 8' hole! Were did you get that from?

The fin keel on a C&C 40 is approx 8' long and 1.5' wide. when the C&C
hits something it rips the hole thing off starting at the smile
working aft. Add 6" on each side of the thin hull that gets ripped of
with it. Just a guesstimate.

Joe



Cheers
Marty

On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 09:21:38 -0500, Joe wrote
(in article .com):

On Feb 1, 11:23 am, Martin Baxter wrote:
Joe wrote:

Well a 2'X8' hole in the bottom of most boats would sink them in a
matter of a few seconds. The C&C 40 has no type of foam floatation,
ect. I think it would go down like a rock. Not a bad looking boat, but
IMO a Pearson 40 is a better boat if you are looking for that type of
boat.

A 2' x 8' hole! Were did you get that from?

The fin keel on a C&C 40 is approx 8' long and 1.5' wide. when the C&C
hits something it rips the hole thing off starting at the smile
working aft. Add 6" on each side of the thin hull that gets ripped of
with it. Just a guesstimate.

Joe



Cheers
Marty



Yep that will ruin your day....I have been on the water for 38 years and
never heard of such a load of crap..... Are you a conspiracist as well?

--
Mundo, The Captain who is a bully and an ass

Joe wrote:
On Feb 1, 11:23 am, Martin Baxter wrote:

Joe wrote:


Well a 2'X8' hole in the bottom of most boats would sink them in a
matter of a few seconds. The C&C 40 has no type of foam floatation,
ect. I think it would go down like a rock. Not a bad looking boat, but
IMO a Pearson 40 is a better boat if you are looking for that type of
boat.

A 2' x 8' hole! Were did you get that from?


The fin keel on a C&C 40 is approx 8' long and 1.5' wide. when the C&C
hits something it rips the hole thing off starting at the smile
working aft. Add 6" on each side of the thin hull that gets ripped of
with it. Just a guesstimate.

Joe



Cheers
Marty



I knew someone who sailed all the way back from the Carib. to Michigan
in a 40' CandC, with the smile, after he had hit a reef there....the
smile was quite extensive and the repair job took awhile, but the damage
to the underside did not warrant him scuttling the trip back with the
boat. I also knew someone with a 46' CandC who hit a rock hard in the
St. Mary's River up between the lower and upper Peninsula of MI and they
,made it back to White Lake, Mi without taking on water or further
damage...the whole keel does not rip off...it was a design flaw and is
correctable and IMO, worth correcting because they are excellent
boats...we considered CandC's but they are a little bleak in the
downstairs department...not a lot of wood, which we like in an interior...

"katy" wrote in message
...
Joe wrote:
On Feb 1, 11:23 am, Martin Baxter wrote:

Joe wrote:


Well a 2'X8' hole in the bottom of most boats would sink them in a
matter of a few seconds. The C&C 40 has no type of foam floatation,
ect. I think it would go down like a rock. Not a bad looking boat, but
IMO a Pearson 40 is a better boat if you are looking for that type of
boat.

A 2' x 8' hole! Were did you get that from?


The fin keel on a C&C 40 is approx 8' long and 1.5' wide. when the C&C
hits something it rips the hole thing off starting at the smile
working aft. Add 6" on each side of the thin hull that gets ripped of
with it. Just a guesstimate.

Joe



Cheers
Marty



I knew someone who sailed all the way back from the Carib. to Michigan in
a 40' CandC, with the smile, after he had hit a reef there....the smile
was quite extensive and the repair job took awhile, but the damage to the
underside did not warrant him scuttling the trip back with the boat. I
also knew someone with a 46' CandC who hit a rock hard in the St. Mary's
River up between the lower and upper Peninsula of MI and they ,made it
back to White Lake, Mi without taking on water or further damage...the
whole keel does not rip off...it was a design flaw and is correctable and
IMO, worth correcting because they are excellent boats...we considered
CandC's but they are a little bleak in the downstairs department...not a
lot of wood, which we like in an interior...


I've sailed in the bay and to the Farallons on a C&C 40, early 80s version,
and in not that great shape.. certainly not as nice a one as Gray, and it
was a very sturdy boat. I would have no hesitation in taking one coastal
cruising in these waters, all things being equal.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

On Feb 3, 8:41 am, Mundo wrote:
On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 09:21:38 -0500, Joe wrote
(in article .com):





On Feb 1, 11:23 am, Martin Baxter wrote:
Joe wrote:

Well a 2'X8' hole in the bottom of most boats would sink them in a
matter of a few seconds. The C&C 40 has no type of foam floatation,
ect. I think it would go down like a rock. Not a bad looking boat, but
IMO a Pearson 40 is a better boat if you are looking for that type of
boat.

A 2' x 8' hole! Were did you get that from?

The fin keel on a C&C 40 is approx 8' long and 1.5' wide. when the C&C
hits something it rips the hole thing off starting at the smile
working aft. Add 6" on each side of the thin hull that gets ripped of
with it. Just a guesstimate.

Joe

Cheers
Marty

Yep that will ruin your day....I have been on the water for 38 years and
never heard of such a load of crap..... Are you a conspiracist as well?

--
Mundo, The Captain who is a bully and an ass- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I found this on the net:

The S.S. Iole

In September a severe Channel gale dismasted her and caused her other
damage. Refitted, the Iole set out again early in the year with Major
Thomas Blandy as commander and Captain " Sailor " Fielder as
navigating officer, but when entering the Humber on Saturday 19th June
she ran on a sandbank; the tide was so violent that her keel was torn
off and she sank immediately. All hands were saved, but they lost
their belongings.

Jon spoke of the Potato patch, combined with SF's fierce tides, and a
faulty keel design it's a big possiablilty IMO.

I still think he was T-bone by an outbound ship. Microsoft is
reviewing satt. images looking for Gray, and at ships in the area at
the time. I'm sure they have people around the globe cheaking ship
bows for traces of red fiberglass or fresh paint damage.

Joe

"Joe" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Feb 3, 8:41 am, Mundo wrote:
On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 09:21:38 -0500, Joe wrote
(in article .com):





On Feb 1, 11:23 am, Martin Baxter wrote:
Joe wrote:

Well a 2'X8' hole in the bottom of most boats would sink them in a
matter of a few seconds. The C&C 40 has no type of foam floatation,
ect. I think it would go down like a rock. Not a bad looking boat,
but
IMO a Pearson 40 is a better boat if you are looking for that type of
boat.

A 2' x 8' hole! Were did you get that from?

The fin keel on a C&C 40 is approx 8' long and 1.5' wide. when the C&C
hits something it rips the hole thing off starting at the smile
working aft. Add 6" on each side of the thin hull that gets ripped of
with it. Just a guesstimate.

Joe

Cheers
Marty

Yep that will ruin your day....I have been on the water for 38 years and
never heard of such a load of crap..... Are you a conspiracist as well?

--
Mundo, The Captain who is a bully and an ass- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I found this on the net:

The S.S. Iole

In September a severe Channel gale dismasted her and caused her other
damage. Refitted, the Iole set out again early in the year with Major
Thomas Blandy as commander and Captain " Sailor " Fielder as
navigating officer, but when entering the Humber on Saturday 19th June
she ran on a sandbank; the tide was so violent that her keel was torn
off and she sank immediately. All hands were saved, but they lost
their belongings.

Jon spoke of the Potato patch, combined with SF's fierce tides, and a
faulty keel design it's a big possiablilty IMO.

I still think he was T-bone by an outbound ship. Microsoft is
reviewing satt. images looking for Gray, and at ships in the area at
the time. I'm sure they have people around the globe cheaking ship
bows for traces of red fiberglass or fresh paint damage.

Joe

There would have been significant debris from a collision, and as far as bad
weather goes, it wasn't that day.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com