Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 1, 9:10 am, Martin Baxter wrote:
Joe wrote: If he hit a potato (in the patch) it ripped off the bolted on keel and he sunk in just a few seconds. On top of that he was tethered to the boat and was pulled down with her. Thats my guess. With such light winds he was motoring at full speed. I don't think that C&C 40 _without_ a keel would sink all that fast. Cheers Marty Well a 2'X8' hole in the bottom of most boats would sink them in a matter of a few seconds. The C&C 40 has no type of foam floatation, ect. I think it would go down like a rock. Not a bad looking boat, but IMO a Pearson 40 is a better boat if you are looking for that type of boat. Joe |
#2
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Joe wrote:
Well a 2'X8' hole in the bottom of most boats would sink them in a matter of a few seconds. The C&C 40 has no type of foam floatation, ect. I think it would go down like a rock. Not a bad looking boat, but IMO a Pearson 40 is a better boat if you are looking for that type of boat. A 2' x 8' hole! Were did you get that from? Cheers Marty |
#3
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 1, 11:23 am, Martin Baxter wrote:
Joe wrote: Well a 2'X8' hole in the bottom of most boats would sink them in a matter of a few seconds. The C&C 40 has no type of foam floatation, ect. I think it would go down like a rock. Not a bad looking boat, but IMO a Pearson 40 is a better boat if you are looking for that type of boat. A 2' x 8' hole! Were did you get that from? The fin keel on a C&C 40 is approx 8' long and 1.5' wide. when the C&C hits something it rips the hole thing off starting at the smile working aft. Add 6" on each side of the thin hull that gets ripped of with it. Just a guesstimate. Joe Cheers Marty |
#4
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 09:21:38 -0500, Joe wrote
(in article .com): On Feb 1, 11:23 am, Martin Baxter wrote: Joe wrote: Well a 2'X8' hole in the bottom of most boats would sink them in a matter of a few seconds. The C&C 40 has no type of foam floatation, ect. I think it would go down like a rock. Not a bad looking boat, but IMO a Pearson 40 is a better boat if you are looking for that type of boat. A 2' x 8' hole! Were did you get that from? The fin keel on a C&C 40 is approx 8' long and 1.5' wide. when the C&C hits something it rips the hole thing off starting at the smile working aft. Add 6" on each side of the thin hull that gets ripped of with it. Just a guesstimate. Joe Cheers Marty Yep that will ruin your day....I have been on the water for 38 years and never heard of such a load of crap..... Are you a conspiracist as well? -- Mundo, The Captain who is a bully and an ass |
#5
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 3, 8:41 am, Mundo wrote:
On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 09:21:38 -0500, Joe wrote (in article .com): On Feb 1, 11:23 am, Martin Baxter wrote: Joe wrote: Well a 2'X8' hole in the bottom of most boats would sink them in a matter of a few seconds. The C&C 40 has no type of foam floatation, ect. I think it would go down like a rock. Not a bad looking boat, but IMO a Pearson 40 is a better boat if you are looking for that type of boat. A 2' x 8' hole! Were did you get that from? The fin keel on a C&C 40 is approx 8' long and 1.5' wide. when the C&C hits something it rips the hole thing off starting at the smile working aft. Add 6" on each side of the thin hull that gets ripped of with it. Just a guesstimate. Joe Cheers Marty Yep that will ruin your day....I have been on the water for 38 years and never heard of such a load of crap..... Are you a conspiracist as well? -- Mundo, The Captain who is a bully and an ass- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I found this on the net: The S.S. Iole In September a severe Channel gale dismasted her and caused her other damage. Refitted, the Iole set out again early in the year with Major Thomas Blandy as commander and Captain " Sailor " Fielder as navigating officer, but when entering the Humber on Saturday 19th June she ran on a sandbank; the tide was so violent that her keel was torn off and she sank immediately. All hands were saved, but they lost their belongings. Jon spoke of the Potato patch, combined with SF's fierce tides, and a faulty keel design it's a big possiablilty IMO. I still think he was T-bone by an outbound ship. Microsoft is reviewing satt. images looking for Gray, and at ships in the area at the time. I'm sure they have people around the globe cheaking ship bows for traces of red fiberglass or fresh paint damage. Joe |
#6
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Joe" wrote in message
ups.com... On Feb 3, 8:41 am, Mundo wrote: On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 09:21:38 -0500, Joe wrote (in article .com): On Feb 1, 11:23 am, Martin Baxter wrote: Joe wrote: Well a 2'X8' hole in the bottom of most boats would sink them in a matter of a few seconds. The C&C 40 has no type of foam floatation, ect. I think it would go down like a rock. Not a bad looking boat, but IMO a Pearson 40 is a better boat if you are looking for that type of boat. A 2' x 8' hole! Were did you get that from? The fin keel on a C&C 40 is approx 8' long and 1.5' wide. when the C&C hits something it rips the hole thing off starting at the smile working aft. Add 6" on each side of the thin hull that gets ripped of with it. Just a guesstimate. Joe Cheers Marty Yep that will ruin your day....I have been on the water for 38 years and never heard of such a load of crap..... Are you a conspiracist as well? -- Mundo, The Captain who is a bully and an ass- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I found this on the net: The S.S. Iole In September a severe Channel gale dismasted her and caused her other damage. Refitted, the Iole set out again early in the year with Major Thomas Blandy as commander and Captain " Sailor " Fielder as navigating officer, but when entering the Humber on Saturday 19th June she ran on a sandbank; the tide was so violent that her keel was torn off and she sank immediately. All hands were saved, but they lost their belongings. Jon spoke of the Potato patch, combined with SF's fierce tides, and a faulty keel design it's a big possiablilty IMO. I still think he was T-bone by an outbound ship. Microsoft is reviewing satt. images looking for Gray, and at ships in the area at the time. I'm sure they have people around the globe cheaking ship bows for traces of red fiberglass or fresh paint damage. Joe There would have been significant debris from a collision, and as far as bad weather goes, it wasn't that day. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#7
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I still think he was T-boned by an outbound ship.
Your conclusion makes sense . But Joe what perplexes me is... wouldn't some sort of debris be evident as a result? I am also quite curious as to what Jonathan has *recently* heard from the locals... since this tragedy took place in his "front yard" so to speak. I'm almost certain his sailing community is awash with various theories. Also... the CG's Northern California deputy sector commander Captain Swatland is also very stymied by this event. I think he said something to the effect that he personally doesn't remember anything happening like this in his 20 plus years career. Bill |
#8
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
oups.com... I still think he was T-boned by an outbound ship. Your conclusion makes sense . But Joe what perplexes me is... wouldn't some sort of debris be evident as a result? I am also quite curious as to what Jonathan has *recently* heard from the locals... since this tragedy took place in his "front yard" so to speak. I'm almost certain his sailing community is awash with various theories. Also... the CG's Northern California deputy sector commander Captain Swatland is also very stymied by this event. I think he said something to the effect that he personally doesn't remember anything happening like this in his 20 plus years career. Bill Yes, you're right on all counts... there should be debris. There is none so far. The local community is awash with rumors, nothing solid. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#9
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Joe wrote:
On Feb 1, 11:23 am, Martin Baxter wrote: Joe wrote: Well a 2'X8' hole in the bottom of most boats would sink them in a matter of a few seconds. The C&C 40 has no type of foam floatation, ect. I think it would go down like a rock. Not a bad looking boat, but IMO a Pearson 40 is a better boat if you are looking for that type of boat. A 2' x 8' hole! Were did you get that from? The fin keel on a C&C 40 is approx 8' long and 1.5' wide. when the C&C hits something it rips the hole thing off starting at the smile working aft. Add 6" on each side of the thin hull that gets ripped of with it. Just a guesstimate. Joe Cheers Marty I knew someone who sailed all the way back from the Carib. to Michigan in a 40' CandC, with the smile, after he had hit a reef there....the smile was quite extensive and the repair job took awhile, but the damage to the underside did not warrant him scuttling the trip back with the boat. I also knew someone with a 46' CandC who hit a rock hard in the St. Mary's River up between the lower and upper Peninsula of MI and they ,made it back to White Lake, Mi without taking on water or further damage...the whole keel does not rip off...it was a design flaw and is correctable and IMO, worth correcting because they are excellent boats...we considered CandC's but they are a little bleak in the downstairs department...not a lot of wood, which we like in an interior... |
#10
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"katy" wrote in message
... Joe wrote: On Feb 1, 11:23 am, Martin Baxter wrote: Joe wrote: Well a 2'X8' hole in the bottom of most boats would sink them in a matter of a few seconds. The C&C 40 has no type of foam floatation, ect. I think it would go down like a rock. Not a bad looking boat, but IMO a Pearson 40 is a better boat if you are looking for that type of boat. A 2' x 8' hole! Were did you get that from? The fin keel on a C&C 40 is approx 8' long and 1.5' wide. when the C&C hits something it rips the hole thing off starting at the smile working aft. Add 6" on each side of the thin hull that gets ripped of with it. Just a guesstimate. Joe Cheers Marty I knew someone who sailed all the way back from the Carib. to Michigan in a 40' CandC, with the smile, after he had hit a reef there....the smile was quite extensive and the repair job took awhile, but the damage to the underside did not warrant him scuttling the trip back with the boat. I also knew someone with a 46' CandC who hit a rock hard in the St. Mary's River up between the lower and upper Peninsula of MI and they ,made it back to White Lake, Mi without taking on water or further damage...the whole keel does not rip off...it was a design flaw and is correctable and IMO, worth correcting because they are excellent boats...we considered CandC's but they are a little bleak in the downstairs department...not a lot of wood, which we like in an interior... I've sailed in the bay and to the Farallons on a C&C 40, early 80s version, and in not that great shape.. certainly not as nice a one as Gray, and it was a very sturdy boat. I would have no hesitation in taking one coastal cruising in these waters, all things being equal. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Tall Ship "TENACIOUS" to Visit USA. | ASA | |||
Tall Ship "TENACIOUS" TO VISIT USA. | Tall Ships | |||
Was this Nonantum a Tall Ship? | Tall Ships | |||
Canadian Navy Sinks American Ship | ASA |