LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to alt.sailing.asa
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,757
Default Hit by ship maybe? Sailed off into the sunset?

wrote in message
oups.com...
Bet it had a keel smile,


Hey Joe... what does that statement mean? As a layperson I'm just
not familiar with that term?

Wow... don't know the guy, but..


Jonathan... today... Latitude 38 had a pretty good presentation of
what
the situation is and the victim envolved.. and the measures that have
been
undertaken by the "coasties" S&R measures... which seemed kind of
thorough.

Since your are a local... at this particular hour... what is now
your take on
this dilemma?

Bill



I just re-read the article, and it's even more strange, given the benign
conditions... 4 ft seas are *nothing*, especially with light air. Either
this some kind of deliberate mis-adventure or it was something catastrophic,
but then there was no debris found. I suppose that's possible given the size
of the search grid, but it seems hard to believe.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com



  #2   Report Post  
posted to alt.sailing.asa
Joe Joe is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,698
Default Hit by ship maybe? Sailed off into the sunset?

On Feb 1, 12:20 am, "Capt. JG" wrote:
wrote in message

oups.com...





Bet it had a keel smile,


Hey Joe... what does that statement mean? As a layperson I'm just
not familiar with that term?


Wow... don't know the guy, but..


Jonathan... today... Latitude 38 had a pretty good presentation of
what
the situation is and the victim envolved.. and the measures that have
been
undertaken by the "coasties" S&R measures... which seemed kind of
thorough.


Since your are a local... at this particular hour... what is now
your take on
this dilemma?


Bill


I just re-read the article, and it's even more strange, given the benign
conditions... 4 ft seas are *nothing*, especially with light air. Either
this some kind of deliberate mis-adventure or it was something catastrophic,
but then there was no debris found. I suppose that's possible given the size
of the search grid, but it seems hard to believe.

--
"j" ganz - Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


If he hit a potato (in the patch) it ripped off the bolted on keel
and he sunk in just a few seconds. On top of that he was tethered to
the boat and was pulled down with her. Thats my guess. With such light
winds he was motoring at full speed.

Joe


  #3   Report Post  
posted to alt.sailing.asa
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 834
Default Hit by ship maybe? Sailed off into the sunset?

Joe wrote:


If he hit a potato (in the patch) it ripped off the bolted on keel
and he sunk in just a few seconds. On top of that he was tethered to
the boat and was pulled down with her. Thats my guess. With such light
winds he was motoring at full speed.


I don't think that C&C 40 _without_ a keel would sink all that fast.

Cheers
Marty
  #4   Report Post  
posted to alt.sailing.asa
Joe Joe is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,698
Default Hit by ship maybe? Sailed off into the sunset?

On Feb 1, 9:10 am, Martin Baxter wrote:
Joe wrote:

If he hit a potato (in the patch) it ripped off the bolted on keel
and he sunk in just a few seconds. On top of that he was tethered to
the boat and was pulled down with her. Thats my guess. With such light
winds he was motoring at full speed.


I don't think that C&C 40 _without_ a keel would sink all that fast.

Cheers
Marty


Well a 2'X8' hole in the bottom of most boats would sink them in a
matter of a few seconds. The C&C 40 has no type of foam floatation,
ect. I think it would go down like a rock. Not a bad looking boat, but
IMO a Pearson 40 is a better boat if you are looking for that type of
boat.

Joe

  #5   Report Post  
posted to alt.sailing.asa
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 834
Default Hit by ship maybe? Sailed off into the sunset?

Joe wrote:



Well a 2'X8' hole in the bottom of most boats would sink them in a
matter of a few seconds. The C&C 40 has no type of foam floatation,
ect. I think it would go down like a rock. Not a bad looking boat, but
IMO a Pearson 40 is a better boat if you are looking for that type of
boat.


A 2' x 8' hole! Were did you get that from?

Cheers
Marty


  #6   Report Post  
posted to alt.sailing.asa
Joe Joe is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,698
Default Hit by ship maybe? Sailed off into the sunset?

On Feb 1, 11:23 am, Martin Baxter wrote:
Joe wrote:

Well a 2'X8' hole in the bottom of most boats would sink them in a
matter of a few seconds. The C&C 40 has no type of foam floatation,
ect. I think it would go down like a rock. Not a bad looking boat, but
IMO a Pearson 40 is a better boat if you are looking for that type of
boat.


A 2' x 8' hole! Were did you get that from?


The fin keel on a C&C 40 is approx 8' long and 1.5' wide. when the C&C
hits something it rips the hole thing off starting at the smile
working aft. Add 6" on each side of the thin hull that gets ripped of
with it. Just a guesstimate.

Joe



Cheers
Marty



  #7   Report Post  
posted to alt.sailing.asa
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2006
Posts: 110
Default Hit by ship maybe? Sailed off into the sunset?

On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 09:21:38 -0500, Joe wrote
(in article .com):

On Feb 1, 11:23 am, Martin Baxter wrote:
Joe wrote:

Well a 2'X8' hole in the bottom of most boats would sink them in a
matter of a few seconds. The C&C 40 has no type of foam floatation,
ect. I think it would go down like a rock. Not a bad looking boat, but
IMO a Pearson 40 is a better boat if you are looking for that type of
boat.


A 2' x 8' hole! Were did you get that from?


The fin keel on a C&C 40 is approx 8' long and 1.5' wide. when the C&C
hits something it rips the hole thing off starting at the smile
working aft. Add 6" on each side of the thin hull that gets ripped of
with it. Just a guesstimate.

Joe



Cheers
Marty




Yep that will ruin your day....I have been on the water for 38 years and
never heard of such a load of crap..... Are you a conspiracist as well?

--
Mundo, The Captain who is a bully and an ass

  #8   Report Post  
posted to alt.sailing.asa
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,109
Default Hit by ship maybe? Sailed off into the sunset?

Joe wrote:
On Feb 1, 11:23 am, Martin Baxter wrote:

Joe wrote:


Well a 2'X8' hole in the bottom of most boats would sink them in a
matter of a few seconds. The C&C 40 has no type of foam floatation,
ect. I think it would go down like a rock. Not a bad looking boat, but
IMO a Pearson 40 is a better boat if you are looking for that type of
boat.


A 2' x 8' hole! Were did you get that from?



The fin keel on a C&C 40 is approx 8' long and 1.5' wide. when the C&C
hits something it rips the hole thing off starting at the smile
working aft. Add 6" on each side of the thin hull that gets ripped of
with it. Just a guesstimate.

Joe



Cheers
Marty




I knew someone who sailed all the way back from the Carib. to Michigan
in a 40' CandC, with the smile, after he had hit a reef there....the
smile was quite extensive and the repair job took awhile, but the damage
to the underside did not warrant him scuttling the trip back with the
boat. I also knew someone with a 46' CandC who hit a rock hard in the
St. Mary's River up between the lower and upper Peninsula of MI and they
,made it back to White Lake, Mi without taking on water or further
damage...the whole keel does not rip off...it was a design flaw and is
correctable and IMO, worth correcting because they are excellent
boats...we considered CandC's but they are a little bleak in the
downstairs department...not a lot of wood, which we like in an interior...
  #9   Report Post  
posted to alt.sailing.asa
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,423
Default Hit by ship maybe? Sailed off into the sunset?


"Joe" wrote
The fin keel on a C&C 40 is approx 8' long and 1.5' wide. when the C&C
hits something it rips the hole thing off starting at the smile
working aft. Add 6" on each side of the thin hull that gets ripped of
with it. Just a guesstimate.


Duh! Not very bright for a guess. Don't they use some big bolts to hold the keel
on? Don't they use fiberglass thicker than anything to bolt it to. If you hit the keel
hard enough to knock it clean off you'd break the bolts before you'd rip the
whole bottom of the boat off. You gotta think of the forces that happen. They
won't try to pull the keel down. They'll try to stop it in its tracks. But the hull
will try to keep going. The bow will go down almost to the deck and the water
will absorb most of the shock.
How fast can that boat go? Maybe seven or eight knots? If the keel hit
a solid rock going that slow it would just bounce back after hitting it.
Nope, it's an insurance scam for life insurance. The guy worked for Microsoft.
He's probably got a huge life insurance policy and a giant retirement plan his
wife's now gonna get. You watch. You'll see I'm right. Somebody needs to ask
the neighbors if they saw anybody loading lots of groceries on the boat.
I was right about that Democrat senator who's practically a vegetable wasn't
I. But I cheated on that one. I had inside info. This time I'm just using my intuition.

Cheers,
Ellen


  #10   Report Post  
posted to alt.sailing.asa
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2006
Posts: 110
Default Hit by ship maybe? Sailed off into the sunset?

On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 09:21:38 -0500, Joe wrote
(in article .com):

On Feb 1, 11:23 am, Martin Baxter wrote:
Joe wrote:

Well a 2'X8' hole in the bottom of most boats would sink them in a
matter of a few seconds. The C&C 40 has no type of foam floatation,
ect. I think it would go down like a rock. Not a bad looking boat, but
IMO a Pearson 40 is a better boat if you are looking for that type of
boat.


A 2' x 8' hole! Were did you get that from?


The fin keel on a C&C 40 is approx 8' long and 1.5' wide. when the C&C
hits something it rips the hole thing off starting at the smile
working aft. Add 6" on each side of the thin hull that gets ripped of
with it. Just a guesstimate.

Joe



Cheers
Marty




I skippered a Bowman 57 for a # of years and the owner wanted to gunkhole out
towards the canadian border up a deep when the tide was i but a little narrow
when it was out "fiord". On the way out in the morning in dense fog using the
radar and loran we tore the side of the keel open on a ledge. All of a sudden
there was this loud hissing sound. After a thorough and quick inspection I
determined that we had ripped the holding tank open. They built them into the
keel on that boat. Owner left and I spent ten days at hinckly yard. Damage
repaired.

--
Mundo, The Captain who is a bully and an ass



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tall Ship "TENACIOUS" to Visit USA. Chris Brady ASA 0 January 21st 04 10:13 PM
Tall Ship "TENACIOUS" TO VISIT USA. Chris Brady Tall Ships 0 January 21st 04 10:11 PM
Was this Nonantum a Tall Ship? Paul Rands Tall Ships 0 January 5th 04 08:49 PM
Canadian Navy Sinks American Ship sv \Sensoria\ ASA 18 October 7th 03 01:55 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:27 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017