NYC is a shining example of how 'gun control' reduces crime,
eh mate?

Scooter

"scbafreak via BoatKB.com" u25927@uwe wrote in message
news:6c33168292a4f@uwe...
Yes...Did anyone mention disarming Police of Military?

So then there would still be legal ownership of firearms
but only by
government personnel. So now if the Government gets even
more out of control
and the people need to defend themselves, oh well. Oh and
the fact hat
people will still be able to get ahold of firearms and
kill people. Guns are
illegal in England but plenty of crimes are still
committed there with all
sorts of them even ones that arae illegal in the U.S.

--
Message posted via http://www.boatkb.com

Scotty wrote:
NYC is a shining example of how 'gun control' reduces crime,
eh mate?

You forgot about D.C. they don't allow guns in the city at all except for by
police and military. THat's exactly what OzOne is propossing right? They
have one of the highest murder rates in the country. But they don't count
because they are not really a state. Oh and it's only where the president
lives and the freaking capitol of our country, but lets forget about the fact
that its a crime infested city that allows no legal ownership of firearms.

Bill

--
Message posted via BoatKB.com
http://www.boatkb.com/Uwe/Forums.asp...iling/200701/1

"scbafreak via BoatKB.com" u25927@uwe wrote
You forgot about D.C. they don't allow guns in the city at all except for by
police and military. THat's exactly what OzOne is propossing right? They
have one of the highest murder rates in the country. But they don't count
because they are not really a state. Oh and it's only where the president
lives and the freaking capitol of our country, but lets forget about the fact
that its a crime infested city that allows no legal ownership of firearms.

I read the murder rate by firearms is higher in D.C. than in Baghdad...
That's what happens when only criminals have guns and law abiding people aren't
allowed to have guns.

Cheers,
Ellen