OzOne wrote in message ...



Switzerland: An assault rifle on every mantle, a rocket launcher in every
garage. Never invaded, not even by the Nazis.

Yes..have you seen the size of their military?
All Swiss are regarded loosely as reserves....


http://www.constitution.org/mil/mil_act_1792.htm clearly states as a matter
of US law:

I. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United
States of America, in Congress assembled, That each and every free
able-bodied white male citizen of the respective States, resident therein,
who is or shall be of age of eighteen years, and under the age of forty-five
years (except as is herein after excepted) shall severally and respectively
be enrolled in the militia,

Just like Switzerland. Except women and negroes are not militia.

You shouldn't own a gun because you just shot yourself in the foot.

Hopefully the foot wasn't in your mouth.

You shouldn't own a gun because you just shot yourself in the foot.

Hopefully the foot wasn't in your mouth.

Well if you did a study saying its okay for him to shoot himself in the foot
then it should be okay.

--
Message posted via http://www.boatkb.com

"scbafreak via BoatKB.com" u25927@uwe wrote in message
news:6c32c8aa661a7@uwe...
You shouldn't own a gun because you just shot yourself in the foot.

Hopefully the foot wasn't in your mouth.

Well if you did a study saying its okay for him to shoot himself in the
foot
then it should be okay.

--
Message posted via http://www.boatkb.com


Arguments against gun ownership are driven by emotional hysterics. It has
been repeatedly shown that those who scream the loudest against guns usually
own a few themselves:

http://www.enterstageright.com/archi.../0302brady.htm

An ironic twist occurs late in the story. Her bright, but troublesome son
matured into a responsible young man and he wished to receive a hunting
rifle for Christmas. At first horrified, Brady decided that her son was a
grown man and she wasn't going to let her personal feelings get in the way
of giving him what he wanted for Christmas. She writes, "I no longer wanted
to play judge and jury" in his life. If only the rest of us were so
fortunate.

Her experience at the gun store is priceless. She seems afraid that the gun
owners in the shop might turn on her if they discover who she is as the gun
dealer calls in her identifying information to request government approval
of her purchase. Her feelings are similar to those reported by responsible
gun owners who feel they are treated like criminals every time they buy a
firearm.

http://www.gunowners.org/pr0203.htm

http://www.stentorian.com/2ndamend/l...s/kennedy.html



You can't own guns! You can't have all that money! You can't think like
that! You cannot teach your kids that! You can't freely enter into that
contract! You can't think for yourself!

If only these idiot liberals could look at themselves.

OzOne wrote in message ...
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 18:27:33 -0700, "Gilligan"
scribbled thusly:


OzOne wrote in message
. ..



Switzerland: An assault rifle on every mantle, a rocket launcher in
every
garage. Never invaded, not even by the Nazis.

Yes..have you seen the size of their military?
All Swiss are regarded loosely as reserves....


http://www.constitution.org/mil/mil_act_1792.htm clearly states as a
matter
of US law:

I. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United
States of America, in Congress assembled, That each and every free
able-bodied white male citizen of the respective States, resident therein,
who is or shall be of age of eighteen years, and under the age of
forty-five
years (except as is herein after excepted) shall severally and
respectively
be enrolled in the militia,

Just like Switzerland. Except women and negroes are not militia.

You shouldn't own a gun because you just shot yourself in the foot.

Hopefully the foot wasn't in your mouth.



So you any every able bodied male in the US is in the militia?

That's great...


It's what makes America great.

OzOne wrote in message news

Yes...Did anyone mention disarming Police of Military?


Here's a good reason for it:

http://player.clipsyndicate.com/play...?wpid=47&cpt=8

Yes...Did anyone mention disarming Police of Military?

So then there would still be legal ownership of firearms but only by
government personnel. So now if the Government gets even more out of control
and the people need to defend themselves, oh well. Oh and the fact hat
people will still be able to get ahold of firearms and kill people. Guns are
illegal in England but plenty of crimes are still committed there with all
sorts of them even ones that arae illegal in the U.S.

--
Message posted via http://www.boatkb.com

Did you look that up in your copy of Mein Kampf ?

Scooter

OzOne wrote in message
...
On Sat, 13 Jan 2007 01:19:34 GMT, "scbafreak via
BoatKB.com"
u25927@uwe scribbled thusly:


Did you know that one of the first things Hitler,
Mussolini and Stalin did
when they got into power was to implement gun control
policies and make the
people think it was a good idea to take away their guns?
Today the democrats
justification, in the U.S., to reduce gun ownership is
alomst identical to
the justification that Hitler used.

Actually it's not.
They have seen the figures and studies....Hitler and Musso
did none.


Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,
We've been expecting you.

OzOne wrote in message
...
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 18:07:22 -0700, "Gilligan"
scribbled thusly:


OzOne wrote in message
news
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:22:53 -0700, "Gilligan"
scribbled thusly:

If guns can't prevent or stop crime then why are police
armed?

because they need to be armed against an armed
community.



An armed community. Just what the second amendment
intended. That is the
ultimate check against government excess and abuse.

Yes, nothing like a good shootout with Police eh....


Can you just imagine what some police would do if the public
were totally unarmed?

Why can't we all just get along? RK

NYC is a shining example of how 'gun control' reduces crime,
eh mate?

Scooter

"scbafreak via BoatKB.com" u25927@uwe wrote in message
news:6c33168292a4f@uwe...
Yes...Did anyone mention disarming Police of Military?

So then there would still be legal ownership of firearms
but only by
government personnel. So now if the Government gets even
more out of control
and the people need to defend themselves, oh well. Oh and
the fact hat
people will still be able to get ahold of firearms and
kill people. Guns are
illegal in England but plenty of crimes are still
committed there with all
sorts of them even ones that arae illegal in the U.S.

--
Message posted via http://www.boatkb.com

Scotty wrote:
NYC is a shining example of how 'gun control' reduces crime,
eh mate?

You forgot about D.C. they don't allow guns in the city at all except for by
police and military. THat's exactly what OzOne is propossing right? They
have one of the highest murder rates in the country. But they don't count
because they are not really a state. Oh and it's only where the president
lives and the freaking capitol of our country, but lets forget about the fact
that its a crime infested city that allows no legal ownership of firearms.

Bill

--
Message posted via BoatKB.com
http://www.boatkb.com/Uwe/Forums.asp...iling/200701/1