Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ellen MacArthur" wrote in message reenews.net... Not bullocks! The IALA simply recognises the difference. IALA region B covers only the Americas, Japan, S.Korea and the Phillipines and in region B the lateral buoyage system is different to all the rest of the world which is region A. Good wiggle there, Edgar. First you said the USA didn't sign up for the IALA. But they did. So you were wrong. Then you admit the US is a signatory of the IALA but they use IALA-B along with half the world. Tell me Edgar what makes IALA-A better than IALA-B? Seems to me they are both equally correct because they are both sanctioned by the same treaty. It's the same as Yanks saying Brits drive on the *wrong* side of the road. No, it's not the wrong side. It's just an opposite side as we drive on. Both are equally lawful and acceptable.... You can't look down your nose and say one is stupid and the other is smart. I did not say it was stupid or unlawful but I think it is regrettable that the USA did not comply because the other countries in 'B' would then have had to follow suit and we would have had one uniform worldwide system. So I think that IALA, needing to publish something that would be studied by mariners worldwide, had no option but to create a 'B' category because obviously their publication could not leave USA out. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Copying computer CD Charts into a chartplotter | Electronics | |||
Nautical Charts | Cruising | |||
Free downloads of official NOAA raster charts | General | |||
Bill Moyers on environment, politics and Christian fundamentalists | General | |||
What?! Charts, again!? | Cruising |