Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#331
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
OT / My pet peeve *fatties*... more VAT
"Walt" wrote in message With the right exemptions, it can be. Say, a flat X percent with the first Y dollars exempt. By adjusting X and Y one can make it as progressive or regressive as you want. How, then, would that be a "flat tax?" Max |
#332
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
OT / My pet peeve *fatties*
"Martin Baxter" wrote in message ... Maxprop wrote: I was fired from a summer job because I refused to join the union in a union shop. The monthly dues amounted to about half my meager pay. I couldn't afford it. Just what union was that, the Mob perhaps? Perhaps it never occurred to you that my wages were meager? And that the union dues were based upon substantially higher wage levels? It was a summer job between years in high school, after all. Max |
#333
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
OT / My pet peeve *fatties*
"Capt. JG" wrote in message I am not sure about the requirement to join a union to work. It's a mixed bag of protection and obligation. I've seen, as I said, both sides of it. Closed and union shops are not uncommon. One hears much complaining about them, but such complaints fall on deaf union boss ears. Not at all unlike strong-arm management tactics, right? The unfortunate workers takes it in the ass, despite who's doing the screwing. Max |
#334
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
OT / My pet peeve *fatties*
"Gilligan" wrote in message
... "Capt. JG" wrote in message ... "Frank Boettcher" wrote in message ... On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 14:16:05 -0800, "Capt. JG" wrote: "Frank Boettcher" wrote in message m... On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 10:29:56 -0800, "Capt. JG" wrote: "Frank Boettcher" wrote in message news:flldn2lbfsnk32pqoha1e8f5b2097bqpps@4ax. com... On Tue, 5 Dec 2006 21:15:11 -0800, "Capt. JG" wrote: That's a tougher question. I was part of union, and I was required to join for a summer job. There were dues, but the benefits and the pay were pretty good, considering I was in high school and had minimal experience. I had an accident at work while driving a forklift... damaged a lot of expensive equipment through no fault of my own except inexperience. If I had not been a member of the union, I would have been fired for sure. I was slightly injured and had to take off a couple of weeks. The salaried supervisor asked me one time what happened. The union steward was present, and he stopped him when he started to get mean (I'm sure his job was on the line). I was given an opportunity to make a statement, and briefly mentioned my lack of experience. When I returned to work, the supervisor found someone to train me, so that it wouldn't happen again. In another situation, I was a staff employee in a union shop (defense contractor). The union was pretty strict about members not doing anything beyond their job description, but tended to look the other way if you had a good relationship with the employee/staff member. We had a situation of another supervisor telling his subordinates (me included) that we shouldn't fraternize with union people... exchange pleasantries and the like... I think he was on a power trip. When this became obvious to a union member, he basically walked off the job along with the other members in the shop until the "rule" was rescinded. Very difficult to believe, Jon. Considered a wildcat strike, an unfair labor practice, and no Union that I know of would allow that to happen. Could be held liable for any damages to the company over the issue. If there is nothing written in the contract about the right to fraternize then you cannot "strike" over any aspect of the issue. If there is something in the contract about it, you would have to go through the grievance procedure. Frank It lasted about 1/2 hour. Everyone was satisfied with the result. Can't help it if you have difficulty believing it. Management was satisfied to accept the cost of a half hour disruption and shutdown of their operation with an illegal wildcat strike? No I don't believe that. Management should have filed an unfair labor practice complaint with the NLRB, and if they did not, it is very difficult to believe. The Union cannot endorse a "strike" over any issue, grievable or not, that is why there is a contract. Frank Why do I care what you believe again? I have no idea. I think you do. :-) You don't know much about management/employee relations do you. Quite a bit. Frank You haven't demonstrated that... -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com I've finally figured it out Jon. You're the best troll here. All this time I thought you were off your rocker, but your simply trolling the daylights out of everyone. You're an order of magnitude better than RB. My hat's off to you! Spectacular job! I apologize. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#335
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
OT / My pet peeve *fatties*
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:54:03 -0800, "Capt. JG"
wrote: "Frank Boettcher" wrote in message .. . On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 14:16:05 -0800, "Capt. JG" wrote: "Frank Boettcher" wrote in message ... On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 10:29:56 -0800, "Capt. JG" wrote: "Frank Boettcher" wrote in message om... On Tue, 5 Dec 2006 21:15:11 -0800, "Capt. JG" wrote: That's a tougher question. I was part of union, and I was required to join for a summer job. There were dues, but the benefits and the pay were pretty good, considering I was in high school and had minimal experience. I had an accident at work while driving a forklift... damaged a lot of expensive equipment through no fault of my own except inexperience. If I had not been a member of the union, I would have been fired for sure. I was slightly injured and had to take off a couple of weeks. The salaried supervisor asked me one time what happened. The union steward was present, and he stopped him when he started to get mean (I'm sure his job was on the line). I was given an opportunity to make a statement, and briefly mentioned my lack of experience. When I returned to work, the supervisor found someone to train me, so that it wouldn't happen again. In another situation, I was a staff employee in a union shop (defense contractor). The union was pretty strict about members not doing anything beyond their job description, but tended to look the other way if you had a good relationship with the employee/staff member. We had a situation of another supervisor telling his subordinates (me included) that we shouldn't fraternize with union people... exchange pleasantries and the like... I think he was on a power trip. When this became obvious to a union member, he basically walked off the job along with the other members in the shop until the "rule" was rescinded. Very difficult to believe, Jon. Considered a wildcat strike, an unfair labor practice, and no Union that I know of would allow that to happen. Could be held liable for any damages to the company over the issue. If there is nothing written in the contract about the right to fraternize then you cannot "strike" over any aspect of the issue. If there is something in the contract about it, you would have to go through the grievance procedure. Frank It lasted about 1/2 hour. Everyone was satisfied with the result. Can't help it if you have difficulty believing it. Management was satisfied to accept the cost of a half hour disruption and shutdown of their operation with an illegal wildcat strike? No I don't believe that. Management should have filed an unfair labor practice complaint with the NLRB, and if they did not, it is very difficult to believe. The Union cannot endorse a "strike" over any issue, grievable or not, that is why there is a contract. Frank Why do I care what you believe again? I have no idea. I think you do. :-) You don't know much about management/employee relations do you. Quite a bit. Frank You haven't demonstrated that... Not taking that bait, Jon. But I'll ask a question of you since you have passed judgement without any facts. How many organizations have you managed? How many of them were organized. How many in right to work states? How many union contracts have you negotiated? How many grievance meetings have you attended. How many labor/management meetings have you conducted. I'm still waiting for your experiences that qualify you to make sound judgements about the difference in effectiveness between very large organizations and small organizations. What's it been two years? Frank |
#336
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
OT / My pet peeve *fatties*... more VAT
Maxprop wrote:
"Walt" wrote in message With the right exemptions, it can be. Say, a flat X percent with the first Y dollars exempt. By adjusting X and Y one can make it as progressive or regressive as you want. How, then, would that be a "flat tax?" See the work of Hall & Rabushka in the early 80's, the grandfather of all modern "flat tax" proposals. It had a flat 19% tax that applied to corporations and individuals with at $25k deduction for individuals. This sort of scheme is common to all flat tax proposols. In terms of high school analytic geometry, a flat tax is a straight line, but the y-intercept is not necessarily zero. By adjusting the y-intercept, a flat tax can be made more or less progressive. But it's still a flat tax regardless of the intercept. If the y intercept is zero, this is sometimes called a "pure" flat tax, but to insist on this as part of the definition of "flat tax" is to ignore 99% of the actual proposals that call themselves by that name. See http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/publi...cfm?PubID=8521. or http://www.fraserinstitute.ca/shared...sNav=pb&id=151 The flat tax was an interesting proposal. Too bad it was used as a stalking horse. //Walt |
#337
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
OT / My pet peeve *fatties*
"Frank Boettcher" wrote in message
news On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:54:03 -0800, "Capt. JG" wrote: "Frank Boettcher" wrote in message . .. On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 14:16:05 -0800, "Capt. JG" wrote: "Frank Boettcher" wrote in message m... On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 10:29:56 -0800, "Capt. JG" wrote: "Frank Boettcher" wrote in message news:flldn2lbfsnk32pqoha1e8f5b2097bqpps@4ax. com... On Tue, 5 Dec 2006 21:15:11 -0800, "Capt. JG" wrote: That's a tougher question. I was part of union, and I was required to join for a summer job. There were dues, but the benefits and the pay were pretty good, considering I was in high school and had minimal experience. I had an accident at work while driving a forklift... damaged a lot of expensive equipment through no fault of my own except inexperience. If I had not been a member of the union, I would have been fired for sure. I was slightly injured and had to take off a couple of weeks. The salaried supervisor asked me one time what happened. The union steward was present, and he stopped him when he started to get mean (I'm sure his job was on the line). I was given an opportunity to make a statement, and briefly mentioned my lack of experience. When I returned to work, the supervisor found someone to train me, so that it wouldn't happen again. In another situation, I was a staff employee in a union shop (defense contractor). The union was pretty strict about members not doing anything beyond their job description, but tended to look the other way if you had a good relationship with the employee/staff member. We had a situation of another supervisor telling his subordinates (me included) that we shouldn't fraternize with union people... exchange pleasantries and the like... I think he was on a power trip. When this became obvious to a union member, he basically walked off the job along with the other members in the shop until the "rule" was rescinded. Very difficult to believe, Jon. Considered a wildcat strike, an unfair labor practice, and no Union that I know of would allow that to happen. Could be held liable for any damages to the company over the issue. If there is nothing written in the contract about the right to fraternize then you cannot "strike" over any aspect of the issue. If there is something in the contract about it, you would have to go through the grievance procedure. Frank It lasted about 1/2 hour. Everyone was satisfied with the result. Can't help it if you have difficulty believing it. Management was satisfied to accept the cost of a half hour disruption and shutdown of their operation with an illegal wildcat strike? No I don't believe that. Management should have filed an unfair labor practice complaint with the NLRB, and if they did not, it is very difficult to believe. The Union cannot endorse a "strike" over any issue, grievable or not, that is why there is a contract. Frank Why do I care what you believe again? I have no idea. I think you do. :-) You don't know much about management/employee relations do you. Quite a bit. Frank You haven't demonstrated that... Not taking that bait, Jon. But I'll ask a question of you since you have passed judgement without any facts. How many organizations have you managed? How many of them were organized. How many in right to work states? How many union contracts have you negotiated? How many grievance meetings have you attended. How many labor/management meetings have you conducted. I'm still waiting for your experiences that qualify you to make sound judgements about the difference in effectiveness between very large organizations and small organizations. What's it been two years? Frank Frank, you're the one who's passed judgement.. you said you didn't believe me. I said that you haven't demonstrated knowledge that you know much about employee relations. Are you claiming that every time there's a minor violation, management (or the union) should escalate to legal action? -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#338
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
OT / My pet peeve *fatties*
On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 09:07:01 -0800, "Capt. JG"
wrote: "Frank Boettcher" wrote in message news On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:54:03 -0800, "Capt. JG" wrote: "Frank Boettcher" wrote in message ... On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 14:16:05 -0800, "Capt. JG" wrote: "Frank Boettcher" wrote in message om... On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 10:29:56 -0800, "Capt. JG" wrote: "Frank Boettcher" wrote in message news:flldn2lbfsnk32pqoha1e8f5b2097bqpps@4ax .com... On Tue, 5 Dec 2006 21:15:11 -0800, "Capt. JG" wrote: That's a tougher question. I was part of union, and I was required to join for a summer job. There were dues, but the benefits and the pay were pretty good, considering I was in high school and had minimal experience. I had an accident at work while driving a forklift... damaged a lot of expensive equipment through no fault of my own except inexperience. If I had not been a member of the union, I would have been fired for sure. I was slightly injured and had to take off a couple of weeks. The salaried supervisor asked me one time what happened. The union steward was present, and he stopped him when he started to get mean (I'm sure his job was on the line). I was given an opportunity to make a statement, and briefly mentioned my lack of experience. When I returned to work, the supervisor found someone to train me, so that it wouldn't happen again. In another situation, I was a staff employee in a union shop (defense contractor). The union was pretty strict about members not doing anything beyond their job description, but tended to look the other way if you had a good relationship with the employee/staff member. We had a situation of another supervisor telling his subordinates (me included) that we shouldn't fraternize with union people... exchange pleasantries and the like... I think he was on a power trip. When this became obvious to a union member, he basically walked off the job along with the other members in the shop until the "rule" was rescinded. Very difficult to believe, Jon. Considered a wildcat strike, an unfair labor practice, and no Union that I know of would allow that to happen. Could be held liable for any damages to the company over the issue. If there is nothing written in the contract about the right to fraternize then you cannot "strike" over any aspect of the issue. If there is something in the contract about it, you would have to go through the grievance procedure. Frank It lasted about 1/2 hour. Everyone was satisfied with the result. Can't help it if you have difficulty believing it. Management was satisfied to accept the cost of a half hour disruption and shutdown of their operation with an illegal wildcat strike? No I don't believe that. Management should have filed an unfair labor practice complaint with the NLRB, and if they did not, it is very difficult to believe. The Union cannot endorse a "strike" over any issue, grievable or not, that is why there is a contract. Frank Why do I care what you believe again? I have no idea. I think you do. :-) You don't know much about management/employee relations do you. Quite a bit. Frank You haven't demonstrated that... Not taking that bait, Jon. But I'll ask a question of you since you have passed judgement without any facts. How many organizations have you managed? How many of them were organized. How many in right to work states? How many union contracts have you negotiated? How many grievance meetings have you attended. How many labor/management meetings have you conducted. I'm still waiting for your experiences that qualify you to make sound judgements about the difference in effectiveness between very large organizations and small organizations. What's it been two years? Frank Frank, you're the one who's passed judgement.. you said you didn't believe me. I said that you haven't demonstrated knowledge that you know much about employee relations. You don't know much about management/employee relations do you. Sounds like a judgement to me. But maybe not. Are you claiming that every time there's a minor violation, management (or the union) should escalate to legal action? Did I say that? wildcat strike - minor contract violation. You're not serious are you? You might want to answer my questions. Just trying to find out if you actually know anything about the subject or are just flailing around. Frank |
#339
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
OT / My pet peeve *fatties*... more VAT
"Dave" wrote in message ... On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 23:36:37 -0500, "Paladin" noneofyourbusiness.www said: Rebates are unworkable. So I guess the European mechanisms for refunding VAT to tourists are just so many more dead trees. If you are trying to sound like an fool, you are doing a decent job of it. VAT taxes are only refunded to tourists who take themselves and their purchases out of the country. Tourist pay VAT on goods and services of which they avail themselves while in country and these taxes are not refundable. Doing the paperwork on small items taken out of the country isn't generally worth the time. However, if you are buying a yacht and shipping or sailing it out of the country it is. But, this is entirely different than an American having to document every good or service he used from year to year and requesting a refund based upon the fact he purchased everything with retirement fund money. Good luck with that. Now, Dave, it is high time I told you to shut your pie hole. Please spare yourself further embarrassment and discontinue future displays of stupidity. Paladin (Have gun - will travel) -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#340
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
OT / My pet peeve *fatties*
I think you've made your point, Frank. Add labor relations to the long list of subjects on which Jon has opinions without experience, evidence or ability to defend them. PDW Frank Boettcher wrote: On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 09:07:01 -0800, "Capt. JG" wrote: "Frank Boettcher" wrote in message news On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:54:03 -0800, "Capt. JG" wrote: "Frank Boettcher" wrote in message ... On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 14:16:05 -0800, "Capt. JG" wrote: "Frank Boettcher" wrote in message om... On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 10:29:56 -0800, "Capt. JG" wrote: "Frank Boettcher" wrote in message news:flldn2lbfsnk32pqoha1e8f5b2097bqpps@4ax .com... On Tue, 5 Dec 2006 21:15:11 -0800, "Capt. JG" wrote: That's a tougher question. I was part of union, and I was required to join for a summer job. There were dues, but the benefits and the pay were pretty good, considering I was in high school and had minimal experience. I had an accident at work while driving a forklift... damaged a lot of expensive equipment through no fault of my own except inexperience. If I had not been a member of the union, I would have been fired for sure. I was slightly injured and had to take off a couple of weeks. The salaried supervisor asked me one time what happened. The union steward was present, and he stopped him when he started to get mean (I'm sure his job was on the line). I was given an opportunity to make a statement, and briefly mentioned my lack of experience. When I returned to work, the supervisor found someone to train me, so that it wouldn't happen again. In another situation, I was a staff employee in a union shop (defense contractor). The union was pretty strict about members not doing anything beyond their job description, but tended to look the other way if you had a good relationship with the employee/staff member. We had a situation of another supervisor telling his subordinates (me included) that we shouldn't fraternize with union people... exchange pleasantries and the like... I think he was on a power trip. When this became obvious to a union member, he basically walked off the job along with the other members in the shop until the "rule" was rescinded. Very difficult to believe, Jon. Considered a wildcat strike, an unfair labor practice, and no Union that I know of would allow that to happen. Could be held liable for any damages to the company over the issue. If there is nothing written in the contract about the right to fraternize then you cannot "strike" over any aspect of the issue. If there is something in the contract about it, you would have to go through the grievance procedure. Frank It lasted about 1/2 hour. Everyone was satisfied with the result. Can't help it if you have difficulty believing it. Management was satisfied to accept the cost of a half hour disruption and shutdown of their operation with an illegal wildcat strike? No I don't believe that. Management should have filed an unfair labor practice complaint with the NLRB, and if they did not, it is very difficult to believe. The Union cannot endorse a "strike" over any issue, grievable or not, that is why there is a contract. Frank Why do I care what you believe again? I have no idea. I think you do. :-) You don't know much about management/employee relations do you. Quite a bit. Frank You haven't demonstrated that... Not taking that bait, Jon. But I'll ask a question of you since you have passed judgement without any facts. How many organizations have you managed? How many of them were organized. How many in right to work states? How many union contracts have you negotiated? How many grievance meetings have you attended. How many labor/management meetings have you conducted. I'm still waiting for your experiences that qualify you to make sound judgements about the difference in effectiveness between very large organizations and small organizations. What's it been two years? Frank Frank, you're the one who's passed judgement.. you said you didn't believe me. I said that you haven't demonstrated knowledge that you know much about employee relations. You don't know much about management/employee relations do you. Sounds like a judgement to me. But maybe not. Are you claiming that every time there's a minor violation, management (or the union) should escalate to legal action? Did I say that? wildcat strike - minor contract violation. You're not serious are you? You might want to answer my questions. Just trying to find out if you actually know anything about the subject or are just flailing around. Frank |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Pretty but unsailable | Boat Building |