![]() |
problems with gaff rigs?
DSK wrote:
Gaff rigs are cool. I keep toying with the idea of getting a gaff Scotty wrote: for your tugboat? No, like this http://www.shrimperowners.org/Home/i...wake718_fs.jpg DSK Oh cute...there's one of those out at the city marina in Cape Char;es... |
problems with gaff rigs?
Heh... I wasn't thinking of putting it on my boat...
-- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Maxprop" wrote in message ink.net... "Capt. JG" wrote in message ... So, what are the downsides to gaff rigs? I know about weight aloft and possible handling issues with the gaff, but anything else? Go for it, Jon. I think a gaff rig would look great on a Sabre 30. In fact, why not consider turning the boat into a schooner with four or five headsails . . . :-) Max |
problems with gaff rigs?
Taddy and Doug... great answers! That's what I was looking for...
-- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "DSK" wrote in message . .. Capt. JG wrote: So, what are the downsides to gaff rigs? I know about weight aloft and possible handling issues with the gaff, but anything else? Of course! There's always "something else!" Flying Tadpole wrote: The main downside, poorer pointing, is also a function of the main upside, which is lower center of effort and greater ease of holding the boat up under a press of canvas. Yep... performance not so good to windward, GREAT off the wind. A secondary downside is controlling twist. If the twist really upsets you, the paraphernalia of downhauls and vangs needed to reduce it to modern desires, you might as well go for a modern rig. You can vang a schooner's foresail pretty well, but I've never seen a gaff vang run to the aft quarters that was worth a durn. It does help bend the gaff for flattening, though... just make sure your crew doesn't confuse it for the running backs! There is no point however in imitating the lightly sparred racing gaffers of long ago: their rigs were every bit as prone to disintegration as a modern highly-strung (!) bermuda racing rig. Rather more so, I would think. But let's mention in passing that the gaff-rigged maxi racers of yore would shock many sailors with their speed off the wind, several were clocked in the high teens and rumors abounded of 20 knot runs. ..... THe virtues come in cruising, on heavier boats (yes, Flying Tadpole II was a quite intentional aberration, and she was terrible to windward in any sort of a seaway). (Lady Kate's gaff by the way is almost identical to Flying Tadpole II's mainmast). Aerodynamically speaking? ;) The added weight of the gaff at the top of the sail can be advantage, the sail definitely comes down when you want it to. It also can be shortend down very quickly and easiy, much faster than a marconi can be reefed (of course, it's sort of an emergency measure and you do have to straighten it up later). Just cast off the peak halyard and let the upper half of the sail drop into the lee of the lower half... "scandalizing" it's called. Another advantage, often proclaimed by my grandfather as the reason why he just couldn't get any enjoyment out of racing marconi-rigged boats, is that between the peak & throat halyards you have a very fine adjustment for sail shape. Disadvantage... extra rope & pulleys flopping about on the mast. Gaff rigs are cool. I keep toying with the idea of getting a gaffer instead of a modern boat. Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
problems with gaff rigs?
Capt. JG wrote:
Heh... I wasn't thinking of putting it on my boat... Thank you..I am relieved....mucking up a Sabre like that would have made me question your sanity (not that I haven't questioned it before...smilie thing...) |
problems with gaff rigs?
Jon,
My major objection, after weight aloft is maintenance. Jon, In all my years of sailing, I can't remember a Gaff rig without Gaff boom Jaws, which means a greased main and a absence of a sail track which means sail hoops on the Luff of the sail, which also increases the chance of jamming, which also increases the need for a slippery mast, which is a PITA. In its defence though, on a cruising rig the sail shape is closer to the shape of the Max. area of the effort of the sail. http://community.webtv.net/tassail/ILLDRINKTOTHAT http://community.webtv.net/tassail/ThomPage |
problems with gaff rigs?
No problem... I question my sanity every morning.
-- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "katy" wrote in message ... Capt. JG wrote: Heh... I wasn't thinking of putting it on my boat... Thank you..I am relieved....mucking up a Sabre like that would have made me question your sanity (not that I haven't questioned it before...smilie thing...) |
problems with gaff rigs?
Yes, I see what you mean. I was just curious, since the gaff rig is a lot
like a huge roach. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Thom Stewart" wrote in message ... Jon, My major objection, after weight aloft is maintenance. Jon, In all my years of sailing, I can't remember a Gaff rig without Gaff boom Jaws, which means a greased main and a absence of a sail track which means sail hoops on the Luff of the sail, which also increases the chance of jamming, which also increases the need for a slippery mast, which is a PITA. In its defence though, on a cruising rig the sail shape is closer to the shape of the Max. area of the effort of the sail. http://community.webtv.net/tassail/ILLDRINKTOTHAT http://community.webtv.net/tassail/ThomPage |
problems with gaff rigs?
Thom Stewart wrote: Jon, My major objection, after weight aloft is maintenance. Jon, In all my years of sailing, I can't remember a Gaff rig without Gaff boom Jaws, ..... which shows that, despite your years of sailing experience, it's relatively narrowly based. Otherwise you'd know about saddles - basically a leathered metal section that closely fits the mast off of which the gaff pivots. Quite a neat arrangement. which means a greased main and a absence of a sail track which means sail hoops on the Luff of the sail, which also increases the chance of jamming, which also increases the need for a slippery mast, which is a PITA. Also untrue. You can lace the sail to the mast. The absence of sailtrack also means the absence of track jams when trying to lower the sail. In its defence though, on a cruising rig the sail shape is closer to the shape of the Max. area of the effort of the sail. There's an excellent book on all things related to the gaff rig by John Leather IIRC. Called 'The Gaff Rig Handbook' I think. PDW |
problems with gaff rigs?
Thanks Peter... I'll check it out... I have a friend who is really
interested in this sort of setup. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Peter" wrote in message oups.com... Thom Stewart wrote: Jon, My major objection, after weight aloft is maintenance. Jon, In all my years of sailing, I can't remember a Gaff rig without Gaff boom Jaws, .... which shows that, despite your years of sailing experience, it's relatively narrowly based. Otherwise you'd know about saddles - basically a leathered metal section that closely fits the mast off of which the gaff pivots. Quite a neat arrangement. which means a greased main and a absence of a sail track which means sail hoops on the Luff of the sail, which also increases the chance of jamming, which also increases the need for a slippery mast, which is a PITA. Also untrue. You can lace the sail to the mast. The absence of sailtrack also means the absence of track jams when trying to lower the sail. In its defence though, on a cruising rig the sail shape is closer to the shape of the Max. area of the effort of the sail. There's an excellent book on all things related to the gaff rig by John Leather IIRC. Called 'The Gaff Rig Handbook' I think. PDW |
problems with gaff rigs?
Scotty posted to Doug's comment:
Gaff rigs are cool. I keep toying with the idea of getting a gaff for your tugboat? Go for it Doug; A Gaff Rigged Steadying Sail.-------That would be Cool. A PITA but Cool! http://community.webtv.net/tassail/ILLDRINKTOTHAT |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:28 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com