![]() |
problems with gaff rigs?
So, what are the downsides to gaff rigs? I know about weight aloft and
possible handling issues with the gaff, but anything else? -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
problems with gaff rigs?
Capt. JG wrote:
So, what are the downsides to gaff rigs? I know about weight aloft and possible handling issues with the gaff, but anything else? Betcha getting whacked with that giant boom hirts a lot more than a regular one.... |
problems with gaff rigs?
"Capt. JG" wrote in message ... So, what are the downsides to gaff rigs? I know about weight aloft and possible handling issues with the gaff, but anything else? Go for it, Jon. I think a gaff rig would look great on a Sabre 30. In fact, why not consider turning the boat into a schooner with four or five headsails . . . :-) Max |
problems with gaff rigs?
Maxprop wrote:
"Capt. JG" wrote in message ... So, what are the downsides to gaff rigs? I know about weight aloft and possible handling issues with the gaff, but anything else? Go for it, Jon. I think a gaff rig would look great on a Sabre 30. In fact, why not consider turning the boat into a schooner with four or five headsails . . . :-) Max Hey, two of us managed a clubbed jib and a main staysail, but then we cheated. -- Flying Tadpole ---------------------------------- http://www.soundclick.com/flyingtadpole http://music.download.com/timfatchen http://music.download.com/internetopera |
problems with gaff rigs?
Capt. JG wrote:
So, what are the downsides to gaff rigs? I know about weight aloft and possible handling issues with the gaff, but anything else? The main downside, poorer pointing, is also a function of the main upside, which is lower center of effort and greater ease of holding the boat up under a press of canvas. A secondary downside is controlling twist. If the twist really upsets you, the paraphernalia of downhauls and vangs needed to reduce it to modern desires, you might as well go for a modern rig. There is no point however in imitating the lightly sparred racing gaffers of long ago: their rigs were every bit as prone to disintegration as a modern highly-strung (!) bermuda racing rig. THe virtues come in cruising, on heavier boats (yes, Flying Tadpole II was a quite intentional aberration, and she was terrible to windward in any sort of a seaway). (Lady Kate's gaff by the way is almost identical to Flying Tadpole II's mainmast). -- Flying Tadpole ---------------------------------- www.flyingtadpole.com |
problems with gaff rigs?
Capt. JG wrote:
So, what are the downsides to gaff rigs? I know about weight aloft and possible handling issues with the gaff, but anything else? Of course! There's always "something else!" Flying Tadpole wrote: The main downside, poorer pointing, is also a function of the main upside, which is lower center of effort and greater ease of holding the boat up under a press of canvas. Yep... performance not so good to windward, GREAT off the wind. A secondary downside is controlling twist. If the twist really upsets you, the paraphernalia of downhauls and vangs needed to reduce it to modern desires, you might as well go for a modern rig. You can vang a schooner's foresail pretty well, but I've never seen a gaff vang run to the aft quarters that was worth a durn. It does help bend the gaff for flattening, though... just make sure your crew doesn't confuse it for the running backs! There is no point however in imitating the lightly sparred racing gaffers of long ago: their rigs were every bit as prone to disintegration as a modern highly-strung (!) bermuda racing rig. Rather more so, I would think. But let's mention in passing that the gaff-rigged maxi racers of yore would shock many sailors with their speed off the wind, several were clocked in the high teens and rumors abounded of 20 knot runs. ..... THe virtues come in cruising, on heavier boats (yes, Flying Tadpole II was a quite intentional aberration, and she was terrible to windward in any sort of a seaway). (Lady Kate's gaff by the way is almost identical to Flying Tadpole II's mainmast). Aerodynamically speaking? ;) The added weight of the gaff at the top of the sail can be advantage, the sail definitely comes down when you want it to. It also can be shortend down very quickly and easiy, much faster than a marconi can be reefed (of course, it's sort of an emergency measure and you do have to straighten it up later). Just cast off the peak halyard and let the upper half of the sail drop into the lee of the lower half... "scandalizing" it's called. Another advantage, often proclaimed by my grandfather as the reason why he just couldn't get any enjoyment out of racing marconi-rigged boats, is that between the peak & throat halyards you have a very fine adjustment for sail shape. Disadvantage... extra rope & pulleys flopping about on the mast. Gaff rigs are cool. I keep toying with the idea of getting a gaffer instead of a modern boat. Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
problems with gaff rigs?
"DSK" wrote in message . .. Gaff rigs are cool. I keep toying with the idea of getting a gaff for your tugboat? |
problems with gaff rigs?
katy wrote:
Capt. JG wrote: So, what are the downsides to gaff rigs? I know about weight aloft and possible handling issues with the gaff, but anything else? Heavy spar that needs to be hoisted - this implies more complicated rigging for the halyard(s) instead of the simple no-mechanical-advantage systems on a marconi rig. More stuff to go wrong when hoisting or lowering the sail. Not a showstopper by any means, but there's elegance in simplicity. Betcha getting whacked with that giant boom hirts a lot more than a regular one.... If you get whacked hard enough, it's painless. //Walt |
problems with gaff rigs?
Gaff rigs are cool. I keep toying with the idea of getting
a gaff Scotty wrote: for your tugboat? No, like this http://www.shrimperowners.org/Home/i...wake718_fs.jpg DSK |
problems with gaff rigs?
Scotty wrote:
"DSK" wrote in message . .. Gaff rigs are cool. I keep toying with the idea of getting a gaff for your tugboat? It's already gaff rigged...I saw it... |
problems with gaff rigs?
DSK wrote:
Gaff rigs are cool. I keep toying with the idea of getting a gaff Scotty wrote: for your tugboat? No, like this http://www.shrimperowners.org/Home/i...wake718_fs.jpg DSK Oh cute...there's one of those out at the city marina in Cape Char;es... |
problems with gaff rigs?
Heh... I wasn't thinking of putting it on my boat...
-- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Maxprop" wrote in message ink.net... "Capt. JG" wrote in message ... So, what are the downsides to gaff rigs? I know about weight aloft and possible handling issues with the gaff, but anything else? Go for it, Jon. I think a gaff rig would look great on a Sabre 30. In fact, why not consider turning the boat into a schooner with four or five headsails . . . :-) Max |
problems with gaff rigs?
Taddy and Doug... great answers! That's what I was looking for...
-- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "DSK" wrote in message . .. Capt. JG wrote: So, what are the downsides to gaff rigs? I know about weight aloft and possible handling issues with the gaff, but anything else? Of course! There's always "something else!" Flying Tadpole wrote: The main downside, poorer pointing, is also a function of the main upside, which is lower center of effort and greater ease of holding the boat up under a press of canvas. Yep... performance not so good to windward, GREAT off the wind. A secondary downside is controlling twist. If the twist really upsets you, the paraphernalia of downhauls and vangs needed to reduce it to modern desires, you might as well go for a modern rig. You can vang a schooner's foresail pretty well, but I've never seen a gaff vang run to the aft quarters that was worth a durn. It does help bend the gaff for flattening, though... just make sure your crew doesn't confuse it for the running backs! There is no point however in imitating the lightly sparred racing gaffers of long ago: their rigs were every bit as prone to disintegration as a modern highly-strung (!) bermuda racing rig. Rather more so, I would think. But let's mention in passing that the gaff-rigged maxi racers of yore would shock many sailors with their speed off the wind, several were clocked in the high teens and rumors abounded of 20 knot runs. ..... THe virtues come in cruising, on heavier boats (yes, Flying Tadpole II was a quite intentional aberration, and she was terrible to windward in any sort of a seaway). (Lady Kate's gaff by the way is almost identical to Flying Tadpole II's mainmast). Aerodynamically speaking? ;) The added weight of the gaff at the top of the sail can be advantage, the sail definitely comes down when you want it to. It also can be shortend down very quickly and easiy, much faster than a marconi can be reefed (of course, it's sort of an emergency measure and you do have to straighten it up later). Just cast off the peak halyard and let the upper half of the sail drop into the lee of the lower half... "scandalizing" it's called. Another advantage, often proclaimed by my grandfather as the reason why he just couldn't get any enjoyment out of racing marconi-rigged boats, is that between the peak & throat halyards you have a very fine adjustment for sail shape. Disadvantage... extra rope & pulleys flopping about on the mast. Gaff rigs are cool. I keep toying with the idea of getting a gaffer instead of a modern boat. Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
problems with gaff rigs?
Capt. JG wrote:
Heh... I wasn't thinking of putting it on my boat... Thank you..I am relieved....mucking up a Sabre like that would have made me question your sanity (not that I haven't questioned it before...smilie thing...) |
problems with gaff rigs?
Jon,
My major objection, after weight aloft is maintenance. Jon, In all my years of sailing, I can't remember a Gaff rig without Gaff boom Jaws, which means a greased main and a absence of a sail track which means sail hoops on the Luff of the sail, which also increases the chance of jamming, which also increases the need for a slippery mast, which is a PITA. In its defence though, on a cruising rig the sail shape is closer to the shape of the Max. area of the effort of the sail. http://community.webtv.net/tassail/ILLDRINKTOTHAT http://community.webtv.net/tassail/ThomPage |
problems with gaff rigs?
No problem... I question my sanity every morning.
-- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "katy" wrote in message ... Capt. JG wrote: Heh... I wasn't thinking of putting it on my boat... Thank you..I am relieved....mucking up a Sabre like that would have made me question your sanity (not that I haven't questioned it before...smilie thing...) |
problems with gaff rigs?
Yes, I see what you mean. I was just curious, since the gaff rig is a lot
like a huge roach. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Thom Stewart" wrote in message ... Jon, My major objection, after weight aloft is maintenance. Jon, In all my years of sailing, I can't remember a Gaff rig without Gaff boom Jaws, which means a greased main and a absence of a sail track which means sail hoops on the Luff of the sail, which also increases the chance of jamming, which also increases the need for a slippery mast, which is a PITA. In its defence though, on a cruising rig the sail shape is closer to the shape of the Max. area of the effort of the sail. http://community.webtv.net/tassail/ILLDRINKTOTHAT http://community.webtv.net/tassail/ThomPage |
problems with gaff rigs?
Thom Stewart wrote: Jon, My major objection, after weight aloft is maintenance. Jon, In all my years of sailing, I can't remember a Gaff rig without Gaff boom Jaws, ..... which shows that, despite your years of sailing experience, it's relatively narrowly based. Otherwise you'd know about saddles - basically a leathered metal section that closely fits the mast off of which the gaff pivots. Quite a neat arrangement. which means a greased main and a absence of a sail track which means sail hoops on the Luff of the sail, which also increases the chance of jamming, which also increases the need for a slippery mast, which is a PITA. Also untrue. You can lace the sail to the mast. The absence of sailtrack also means the absence of track jams when trying to lower the sail. In its defence though, on a cruising rig the sail shape is closer to the shape of the Max. area of the effort of the sail. There's an excellent book on all things related to the gaff rig by John Leather IIRC. Called 'The Gaff Rig Handbook' I think. PDW |
problems with gaff rigs?
Thanks Peter... I'll check it out... I have a friend who is really
interested in this sort of setup. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Peter" wrote in message oups.com... Thom Stewart wrote: Jon, My major objection, after weight aloft is maintenance. Jon, In all my years of sailing, I can't remember a Gaff rig without Gaff boom Jaws, .... which shows that, despite your years of sailing experience, it's relatively narrowly based. Otherwise you'd know about saddles - basically a leathered metal section that closely fits the mast off of which the gaff pivots. Quite a neat arrangement. which means a greased main and a absence of a sail track which means sail hoops on the Luff of the sail, which also increases the chance of jamming, which also increases the need for a slippery mast, which is a PITA. Also untrue. You can lace the sail to the mast. The absence of sailtrack also means the absence of track jams when trying to lower the sail. In its defence though, on a cruising rig the sail shape is closer to the shape of the Max. area of the effort of the sail. There's an excellent book on all things related to the gaff rig by John Leather IIRC. Called 'The Gaff Rig Handbook' I think. PDW |
problems with gaff rigs?
Scotty posted to Doug's comment:
Gaff rigs are cool. I keep toying with the idea of getting a gaff for your tugboat? Go for it Doug; A Gaff Rigged Steadying Sail.-------That would be Cool. A PITA but Cool! http://community.webtv.net/tassail/ILLDRINKTOTHAT |
problems with gaff rigs?
I guess, maybe, you could call that a Gaff but Doug, that is a
"Connecticut Rig" and quite different in theory. Sail Theory. It's to have a higher hoist with a short Mast. It was a Rule buster. Jack Kennedy's Star had that rig. http://community.webtv.net/tassail/ILLDRINKTOTHAT |
problems with gaff rigs?
Capt. JG wrote:
Yes, I see what you mean. I was just curious, since the gaff rig is a lot like a huge roach. You can smoke it? |
problems with gaff rigs?
Capt. JG wrote:
Yes, I see what you mean. I was just curious, since the gaff rig is a lot like a huge roach. katysails wrote: You can smoke it? heh my first thought was... time to put on those pointy-toed cowboy boots! DSK |
problems with gaff rigs?
Jon,
That Roach,as you say, is also a problem on a beam reach or a run. It puts the center of effort pretty far outboard of the hull. This produces a lot of weather helm which created those big "Barn Door" rudders. This also created the bow sprit and Jib to reduce the tendency to :Round Up and created the Friendship Sloop. A thing of Beauty to these Ole eyes of mine. I can't think of a prettier sight than a Friendship Sloop, carrying a Top sail, scudding across the water. Ah, memories of an Old Man. http://community.webtv.net/tassail/ILLDRINKTOTHAT |
problems with gaff rigs?
Capt. JG wrote: Thanks Peter... I'll check it out... I have a friend who is really interested in this sort of setup. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Peter" wrote in message oups.com... Thom Stewart wrote: Jon, My major objection, after weight aloft is maintenance. Jon, In all my years of sailing, I can't remember a Gaff rig without Gaff boom Jaws, .... which shows that, despite your years of sailing experience, it's relatively narrowly based. Otherwise you'd know about saddles - basically a leathered metal section that closely fits the mast off of which the gaff pivots. Quite a neat arrangement. which means a greased main and a absence of a sail track which means sail hoops on the Luff of the sail, which also increases the chance of jamming, which also increases the need for a slippery mast, which is a PITA. Also untrue. You can lace the sail to the mast. The absence of sailtrack also means the absence of track jams when trying to lower the sail. In its defence though, on a cruising rig the sail shape is closer to the shape of the Max. area of the effort of the sail. There's an excellent book on all things related to the gaff rig by John Leather IIRC. Called 'The Gaff Rig Handbook' I think. Jon, I think it's fair to say that the gaff rig isn't going to point as high as a marconi rig. Nobody really disputes that, tho the difference might depend on a lot of other factors than the rig itself. OTOH you get to set a lot of sail on relatively short sticks which makes staying a lot easier & stronger, reducing the cost of the rig itself. As a racing rig for round the buoys, its day has gone. As a cruising rig - got a lot going for it still. PDW |
problems with gaff rigs?
"Peter" wrote in message ups.com... | | Capt. JG wrote: | Thanks Peter... I'll check it out... I have a friend who is really | interested in this sort of setup. | | -- | "j" ganz @@ | www.sailnow.com | | "Peter" wrote in message | oups.com... | | Thom Stewart wrote: | Jon, | | My major objection, after weight aloft is maintenance. Jon, In all my | years of sailing, I can't remember a Gaff rig without Gaff boom Jaws, | | .... which shows that, despite your years of sailing experience, it's | relatively narrowly based. Otherwise you'd know about saddles - | basically a leathered metal section that closely fits the mast off of | which the gaff pivots. Quite a neat arrangement. | | which means a greased main and a absence of a sail track which means | sail hoops on the Luff of the sail, which also increases the chance of | jamming, which also increases the need for a slippery mast, which is a | PITA. | | Also untrue. You can lace the sail to the mast. The absence of | sailtrack also means the absence of track jams when trying to lower the | sail. | | In its defence though, on a cruising | rig the sail shape is closer to the shape of the Max. area of the effort | of the sail. | | There's an excellent book on all things related to the gaff rig by John | Leather IIRC. Called 'The Gaff Rig Handbook' I think. | | Jon, I think it's fair to say that the gaff rig isn't going to point as | high as a marconi rig. Nobody really disputes that, tho the difference | might depend on a lot of other factors than the rig itself. OTOH you | get to set a lot of sail on relatively short sticks which makes staying | a lot easier & stronger, reducing the cost of the rig itself. | | As a racing rig for round the buoys, its day has gone. As a cruising | rig - got a lot going for it still. | | PDW | It is antiquated. It is too heavy aloft. It has too much weather helm when the wind gets up. It is much harder to reef. It requires more running rigging. Only stupid people would go gaff instead of Marconi. Paladin (Have Blue Water Yacht - Marconi Rigged - Will Travel) -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
problems with gaff rigs?
Peter,
I've heard of "Saddles" but I've never seen it use. Have You? If you have Where have you seen it use and on what vessel ? After the Marconi Rig came into being, designers just added height to the Mast and used higher narrower sails to reduce weather helm and the need for larger rudders and weather helm, with the slowing of the boat with rudder holding course. No Peter, I can't ever remembering seeing a "Saddle" used but there are many things I hasn't seen. http://community.webtv.net/tassail/ILLDRINKTOTHAT |
problems with gaff rigs?
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 17:25:57 -0800, "Capt. JG"
wrote: So, what are the downsides to gaff rigs? I know about weight aloft and possible handling issues with the gaff, but anything else? Unless you're planning to drop a trawl and run down wind to catch shrimp, what possible need would you have for it? Frank |
problems with gaff rigs?
"Thom Stewart" wrote | No Peter, I can't ever remembering seeing a "Saddle" used but there are | many things I hasn't seen. And many more you can't remember seeing. Too much hard liquor kills the ole memory. The saddle is the thing on the business end of the gaff and the boom that straddles the mast. It's usually made of wood and takes the place of the gooseneck. Paladin (Have Blue Water Yacht - Will Travel) -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
problems with gaff rigs?
Nostalgia?
-- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Frank Boettcher" wrote in message ... On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 17:25:57 -0800, "Capt. JG" wrote: So, what are the downsides to gaff rigs? I know about weight aloft and possible handling issues with the gaff, but anything else? Unless you're planning to drop a trawl and run down wind to catch shrimp, what possible need would you have for it? Frank |
problems with gaff rigs?
Walt wrote:
Heavy spar that needs to be hoisted - this implies more complicated rigging for the halyard(s) instead of the simple no-mechanical-advantage systems on a marconi rig. What, no winches on your Marconi rig??? Lady Kate: 16' by 3"to 4" (shaped) gaff main. No winch needed. Simple block setup. All running rigging visible and easily fixable. Good exercise. [If incapable of much physical effort due to age/infirmity/sedentary lifestyle, or just lonely, you could add a winch.] Downside is lots of line: you do need to learn ropehandling, no longer a common skill. Flying Tadpole ---------------------------------- www.flyingtadpole.com |
problems with gaff rigs?
Paladin wrote: "Peter" wrote in message ups.com... | | Capt. JG wrote: | Thanks Peter... I'll check it out... I have a friend who is really | interested in this sort of setup. | | -- | "j" ganz @@ | www.sailnow.com | | "Peter" wrote in message | oups.com... | | Thom Stewart wrote: | Jon, | | My major objection, after weight aloft is maintenance. Jon, In all my | years of sailing, I can't remember a Gaff rig without Gaff boom Jaws, | | .... which shows that, despite your years of sailing experience, it's | relatively narrowly based. Otherwise you'd know about saddles - | basically a leathered metal section that closely fits the mast off of | which the gaff pivots. Quite a neat arrangement. | | which means a greased main and a absence of a sail track which means | sail hoops on the Luff of the sail, which also increases the chance of | jamming, which also increases the need for a slippery mast, which is a | PITA. | | Also untrue. You can lace the sail to the mast. The absence of | sailtrack also means the absence of track jams when trying to lower the | sail. | | In its defence though, on a cruising | rig the sail shape is closer to the shape of the Max. area of the effort | of the sail. | | There's an excellent book on all things related to the gaff rig by John | Leather IIRC. Called 'The Gaff Rig Handbook' I think. | | Jon, I think it's fair to say that the gaff rig isn't going to point as | high as a marconi rig. Nobody really disputes that, tho the difference | might depend on a lot of other factors than the rig itself. OTOH you | get to set a lot of sail on relatively short sticks which makes staying | a lot easier & stronger, reducing the cost of the rig itself. | | As a racing rig for round the buoys, its day has gone. As a cruising | rig - got a lot going for it still. | | PDW | It is antiquated. It is too heavy aloft. It has too much weather helm when the wind gets up. It is much harder to reef. It requires more running rigging. Only stupid people would go gaff instead of Marconi. Paladin (Have Blue Water Yacht - Marconi Rigged - Will Travel) Hah. All you are is a handful of acerbic bytes on the net. You hide your identity so that you can pretend to be a competent human being, but it's still obvious that you're not. Your opinion is completely worthless. I'd suspect you'd loooooove junk rigs then. PDW |
problems with gaff rigs?
Paladin wrote:
It is antiquated. It is too heavy aloft. It has too much weather helm when the wind gets up. It is much harder to reef. It requires more running rigging. Only stupid people would go gaff instead of Marconi. It's pretty clear you've never sailed a gaff rig. Peter wrote: Hah. All you are is a handful of acerbic bytes on the net. You hide your identity so that you can pretend to be a competent human being, but it's still obvious that you're not. Your opinion is completely worthless. I'd suspect you'd loooooove junk rigs then. And be just as incompetent with one of those, as with a gaff. DSK |
problems with gaff rigs?
Neal,
I do remember that a "GooseNeck" is a fitting on the "MAIN BOOM" A permanent one position fitting connecting the Main Boom to the Mast. It doesn't get hoisted as would a Saddle or Boom Jaw on a "GAFF BOOM " :^)) Your sailing ignorance has been demonstrated very well in your post. Thanks Doppy, I don't think a reply is necessary on my part, thanks to you. http://community.webtv.net/tassail/ILLDRINKTOTHAT |
problems with gaff rigs?
Neal/ Paladin,
Take your "Blue Water Yacht and travel" please do. http://community.webtv.net/tassail/ILLDRINKTOTHAT |
problems with gaff rigs?
Doug,
The only Gaff Neal is acquitted is a Gaff Hook that has been used to get "Know Nothings" out of the way http://community.webtv.net/tassail/ILLDRINKTOTHAT |
problems with gaff rigs?
"Capt. JG" wrote in message ... No problem... I question my sanity every morning. As well you should. Of course I tend to be suspect that you haven't come up with a definitive answer by now. Max :-) |
problems with gaff rigs?
No need to suspect. I haven't. If I do, I think I'll be in trouble either
way. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Maxprop" wrote in message ink.net... "Capt. JG" wrote in message ... No problem... I question my sanity every morning. As well you should. Of course I tend to be suspect that you haven't come up with a definitive answer by now. Max :-) |
problems with gaff rigs?
Thom Stewart wrote:
Jon, My major objection, after weight aloft is maintenance. Jon, In all my years of sailing, I can't remember a Gaff rig without Gaff boom Jaws, which means a greased main and a absence of a sail track which means sail hoops on the Luff of the sail, which also increases the chance of jamming, which also increases the need for a slippery mast, which is a PITA. OK Thom...a lot depends where the halyards are led, particularly the throat halyard. If it's in column, the jaws simply become steadiers and the gaff, which is hoisted parallel to the water, should hardly touch the mast on the way up. The most pressure against the mast comes when the throat halyard is at full hoist, and the peak halyard is peaking the sail. When under way, there's no pressure of the jaws against the mast, properly set up. I do have leathered gaff jaws, also a tumbler to ride against the mast, which it doesn't, making it totally redundant. There's no point in greasing the mast: it's not needed and all it does is collect sand, grit and grot. Also: most gaff rigs have far too many hoops or rope parrels on the luff of the sail. usually, only two or three are necessary until you get into the ship size, and they're only needed for sail control in hoisting and lowering, not for shaping the sail. Weather helm was rarely an issue on Flying Tadpole: one used the weather helm to help lift the boat bodily to windward, bat that was a deep rudder. Lady Kate, with a tiny rudder, is set up as a cat yawl: most of the advantages of a catboat, few of the disadvantages. And after Flying Tadpole II's four sails, a mere two are child's play. -- Flying Tadpole ---------------------------------- http://www.soundclick.com/flyingtadpole http://music.download.com/timfatchen http://music.download.com/internetopera |
problems with gaff rigs?
Flying Tadpole wrote:
Walt wrote: Heavy spar that needs to be hoisted - this implies more complicated rigging for the halyard(s) instead of the simple no-mechanical-advantage systems on a marconi rig. What, no winches on your Marconi rig??? Nope. No winches. No motors or electronics either. Lady Kate: 16' by 3"to 4" (shaped) gaff main. No winch needed. Simple block setup. All running rigging visible and easily fixable. Good exercise. [If incapable of much physical effort due to age/infirmity/sedentary lifestyle, or just lonely, you could add a winch.] Downside is lots of line: you do need to learn ropehandling, no longer a common skill. So even with a block system, raising the mainsail is "good exercise". I'd say that's a disadvantage over a marconi rig. Not a big one, and perhaps outweighed by other considerations. OTOH, the need to learn ropehandling should go in the "advantage" column. //Walt |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:07 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com