LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to alt.sailing.asa
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 834
Default Google proves MacGregor 26 is flimsy

JimC wrote:


And you did take math, and geometry in high school? Consider a typical
crew of two people (assume total weight of 350 lbs) and a skipper of 230
lbs. (about my weight). Assuming that the skipper is sitting on the
captain's chair, about 1.5 ft forward of the center of the motor, and
about 16 feet aft of the center of mass. Assuming that the two crew
members are sitting two and three feet forward of the captain,
respectively, their total mass will be the equivalent of 350 pounds
positioned about 14.5 feet from the center of mass about which the boat
has a tendency to pitch. The motor, at about 220 pounds is about 17.5
feet from the center of mass. Squaring the distances, the relative
values of the rotational momentum of the skipper and crew are more than
twice that of the motor, despite the fact that they are closer to the
center of mass. Once again, Jeff, your theories are simply wrong. (If
you wish, I'll provide the calculations and "foot pounds" or whatever,
in greater detail.)


Jim:

I thought I'd run your numbers through my calculator, just for fun:

(14.5ft)^2*350lbs=7.36E4ft^2-lbs , that's 73,600 for the exponent
challenged.

(17.5ft)^2*220lbs=6.74E4ft^2-lbs , 67,400 ....

Maybe you think that 73,600 is more than TWICE 67,400, but I beg to
differ. To a physicist, they're essentially the same thing.

Point to Jeff.

Cheers
Marty
------------ And now a word from our sponsor ------------------
For a quality usenet news server, try DNEWS, easy to install,
fast, efficient and reliable. For home servers or carrier class
installations with millions of users it will allow you to grow!
---- See http://netwinsite.com/sponsor/sponsor_dnews.htm ----
  #2   Report Post  
posted to alt.sailing.asa
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,301
Default Google proves MacGregor 26 is flimsy

Martin Baxter wrote:
JimC wrote:

And you did take math, and geometry in high school? Consider a typical
crew of two people (assume total weight of 350 lbs) and a skipper of 230
lbs. (about my weight). Assuming that the skipper is sitting on the
captain's chair, about 1.5 ft forward of the center of the motor, and
about 16 feet aft of the center of mass. Assuming that the two crew
members are sitting two and three feet forward of the captain,
respectively, their total mass will be the equivalent of 350 pounds
positioned about 14.5 feet from the center of mass about which the boat
has a tendency to pitch. The motor, at about 220 pounds is about 17.5
feet from the center of mass. Squaring the distances, the relative
values of the rotational momentum of the skipper and crew are more than
twice that of the motor, despite the fact that they are closer to the
center of mass. Once again, Jeff, your theories are simply wrong. (If
you wish, I'll provide the calculations and "foot pounds" or whatever,
in greater detail.)


Jim:

I thought I'd run your numbers through my calculator, just for fun:

(14.5ft)^2*350lbs=7.36E4ft^2-lbs , that's 73,600 for the exponent
challenged.

(17.5ft)^2*220lbs=6.74E4ft^2-lbs , 67,400 ....

Maybe you think that 73,600 is more than TWICE 67,400, but I beg to
differ. To a physicist, they're essentially the same thing.

Point to Jeff.


Gawd, I don't believe other people are still reading this!

Thanks for doing the math, but the are a few problems here. Jim uses
his weight (230 lbs) when clearly this should be done with a
"standard" weight (160 lbs). Secondly, Jim invents the figure of 16
feet forward of the helm seat for the center of mass, which puts it
only 8.5 feet aft of the bow! Clearly, it has to be more like 11-12
feet forward of the stern. This has a huge affect on the r^2 part of
the formula, especially for the crew forward of the helm.
  #3   Report Post  
posted to alt.sailing.asa
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 449
Default Google proves MacGregor 26 is flimsy



Martin Baxter wrote:

JimC wrote:


And you did take math, and geometry in high school? Consider a typical
crew of two people (assume total weight of 350 lbs) and a skipper of 230
lbs. (about my weight). Assuming that the skipper is sitting on the
captain's chair, about 1.5 ft forward of the center of the motor, and
about 16 feet aft of the center of mass. Assuming that the two crew
members are sitting two and three feet forward of the captain,
respectively, their total mass will be the equivalent of 350 pounds
positioned about 14.5 feet from the center of mass about which the boat
has a tendency to pitch. The motor, at about 220 pounds is about 17.5
feet from the center of mass. Squaring the distances, the relative
values of the rotational momentum of the skipper and crew are more than
twice that of the motor, despite the fact that they are closer to the
center of mass. Once again, Jeff, your theories are simply wrong. (If
you wish, I'll provide the calculations and "foot pounds" or whatever,
in greater detail.)



Jim:

I thought I'd run your numbers through my calculator, just for fun:

(14.5ft)^2*350lbs=7.36E4ft^2-lbs , that's 73,600 for the exponent
challenged.

(17.5ft)^2*220lbs=6.74E4ft^2-lbs , 67,400 ....

Maybe you think that 73,600 is more than TWICE 67,400, but I beg to
differ. To a physicist, they're essentially the same thing.

Point to Jeff.

Cheers
Marty



Aren't you forgetting the force moment to be attributed to the Skipper,
which would be added to that of the two-man crew? In this case, (230
lbs)*(16ft)^2 . My figure was 58,880, which if added to 73,600 is
132,480. - Not quite twice 67400, but close, and certainly substantially
more than 67400. Obviously, the figures would change if the crew went
forward, or if additional guests were in the cockpit, etc.

My point was that what was considered a major, overriding factor (the
momentum entailed in having a "huge" OB hanging off the stern) is
actually substantially less a factor than others such as the mass of a
typical crew and skipper. It's a matter of perspective.

Jim

Jim
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Google Announces Plan To Destroy All Information It Can't Index TGIF fishing tomorrow General 1 November 30th 05 11:37 PM
Bill Moyers on environment, politics and Christian fundamentalists [email protected] General 1852 April 5th 05 11:17 PM
Google Picks only the best Pics of sailboats! Joe ASA 3 September 27th 03 12:42 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:29 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017