Reagan also cut and ran from Lebenon.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Gilligan" wrote in message
...

"Paladin" noneofyourbusiness.www wrote in message
.. .
Reagan stood up to terrorists and communists. He defeated Soviet Communism
and had terrorism in check. He even cut and run in Bierut (pulling out the
Marines after 240 were killed in a single blast) and still got the job
done. Clinton did nothing, but he is not a consideration on my part.
Democrats are against everythign and for nothing. They want a draft to
maintain a large standing Army to make more wars. Kennedy let hundreds die
on the beach at the Bay of Pigs and cut a "secret" deal over the Ciban
missile crisis. Roosevelt left more Europeans under totalitarian regimes
at the end of WWII than before it began. LBJ gave us VietNam. Carter let
an American Embassy be captured. Bush is a fumbling Republican. He has
expanded the size of government and has poorly explained the case for
Iraq. Patriotic bromides don't cut it here. He was correct to take action
against terrorists, but is all action justififable?

Paladin wrote:

"Capt. JG" wrote
|I think the House is going to switch. It would be nice if the Senate did
| also, but it's not essential to stop Bush.

****ing moron actually believes the liberal media polls. Sorry, Gay Boy, but you aren't going
to get your wish. Hell will freeze over before gay marriage is legal.

crap snipped

Paladin
(Have blue water yacht - will travel)

Another sock puppet from you know who?

//Walt

Yes. I know who.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Walt" wrote in message
...
Paladin wrote:

"Capt. JG" wrote |I think the House is going to
switch. It would be nice if the Senate did | also, but it's not essential
to stop Bush.

****ing moron actually believes the liberal media polls. Sorry, Gay Boy,
but you aren't going to get your wish. Hell will freeze over before gay
marriage is legal.

crap snipped

Paladin
(Have blue water yacht - will travel)

Another sock puppet from you know who?

//Walt

Beirut is in Lebanon.


"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
Reagan also cut and ran from Lebenon.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Gilligan" wrote in message
...

"Paladin" noneofyourbusiness.www wrote in message
.. .
Reagan stood up to terrorists and communists. He defeated Soviet
Communism and had terrorism in check. He even cut and run in Bierut
(pulling out the Marines after 240 were killed in a single blast) and
still got the job done. Clinton did nothing, but he is not a
consideration on my part. Democrats are against everythign and for
nothing. They want a draft to maintain a large standing Army to make more
wars. Kennedy let hundreds die on the beach at the Bay of Pigs and cut a
"secret" deal over the Ciban missile crisis. Roosevelt left more
Europeans under totalitarian regimes at the end of WWII than before it
began. LBJ gave us VietNam. Carter let an American Embassy be captured.
Bush is a fumbling Republican. He has expanded the size of government and
has poorly explained the case for Iraq. Patriotic bromides don't cut it
here. He was correct to take action against terrorists, but is all action
justififable?

"Paladin" noneofyourbusiness.www wrote in message
.. .

Get out the Kleenex because Republicans are going to hold the House and
the Senate.

Got that right!

Some claim if the Dems get the House all the problems will be solved.

If they did win the House, they would then claim they need the Presidency.

If they then got the Presidency, they would claim they need the SEnate.

After they got the Senate, they would say "What problem?"

So, what's your point?

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Gilligan" wrote in message
...
Beirut is in Lebanon.


"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
Reagan also cut and ran from Lebenon.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Gilligan" wrote in message
...

"Paladin" noneofyourbusiness.www wrote in message
.. .
Reagan stood up to terrorists and communists. He defeated Soviet
Communism and had terrorism in check. He even cut and run in Bierut
(pulling out the Marines after 240 were killed in a single blast) and
still got the job done. Clinton did nothing, but he is not a
consideration on my part. Democrats are against everythign and for
nothing. They want a draft to maintain a large standing Army to make
more wars. Kennedy let hundreds die on the beach at the Bay of Pigs and
cut a "secret" deal over the Ciban missile crisis. Roosevelt left more
Europeans under totalitarian regimes at the end of WWII than before it
began. LBJ gave us VietNam. Carter let an American Embassy be captured.
Bush is a fumbling Republican. He has expanded the size of government
and has poorly explained the case for Iraq. Patriotic bromides don't cut
it here. He was correct to take action against terrorists, but is all
action justififable?

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
I think the House is going to switch. It would be nice if the Senate did
also, but it's not essential to stop Bush.

I believe both will change. At the very least I'll be surprised if neither
house does.

Max

An optimist... :-)

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Maxprop" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
I think the House is going to switch. It would be nice if the Senate did
also, but it's not essential to stop Bush.

I believe both will change. At the very least I'll be surprised if
neither house does.

Max

Neither will change. Cheney is not going hunting as he says. He is going to
a secret location to pull the levers and push the buttons for Diebold Voting
machines.



"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
An optimist... :-)

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Maxprop" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
I think the House is going to switch. It would be nice if the Senate did
also, but it's not essential to stop Bush.

I believe both will change. At the very least I'll be surprised if
neither house does.

Max

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
"Maxprop" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
I think the House is going to switch. It would be nice if the Senate did
also, but it's not essential to stop Bush.

I believe both will change. At the very least I'll be surprised if
neither house does.

An optimist... :-)

Pessimist, actually. g

In all honesty, I really don't care. Sun up, sun down, change of the
moon--the world and this country will continue along the same path
regardless of who's driving.

Max