Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Martin Baxter wrote:
Flying Tadpole wrote: Gilligan wrote: ? http://msnbc.msn.com/id/15391426/site/newsweek ? ? . But of course we have lotsa big computers now, so that's all right, and the predictions must therefore be much more reliable and accurate. GIGO. Well things do change, Galileo was eventually proved correct (more or less): "The point to remember, says Connolley, is that predictions of global cooling never approached the kind of widespread scientific consensus that supports the greenhouse effect today. And for good reason: the tools scientists have at their disposal now—vastly more data, incomparably faster computers and infinitely more sophisticated mathematical models—render any forecasts from 1975 as inoperative as the predictions being made around the same time about the inevitable triumph of communism." Cheers Marty Which is a longer-winded way of saying "of course we have lotsa big computers now, so that's all right, and the predictions must therefore be much more reliable and accurate." To which I add "GIGO" because, quite simply, the modelling is a multiple generation extrapolation (model based on model output based on model output) using a simply inadequate data base. Too short a time scale with reliable data. I was always intrigued when a former client demanded we stop using simple analytical techniques, with confidence tests based on testable null hypotheses, on their SO2 problem and start using a surface modeller, where confidence tests were not applied in the strict sense and where the model was a generator, not a tester of hypotheses. It was fun, though, tweaking the various model parameters and treatments to generate the reverse of what (our) independent observations were indicating. I discovered, earlier this year, that the absolute best coastal models applied by supposedly the best Oz modelling scientists could not cope with longshore drift (==mandatory sailing content) because it was too close to shore. These are the same people making a "significant global contribution" to current climate modelling. Yeah. GIGO. -- Flying Tadpole ---------------------------------- www.flyingtadpole.com http://www.soundclick.com/flyingtadpole http://music.download.com/timfatchen http://music.download.com/internetopera |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Did You Pick the Wrong Boat? | ASA | |||
Battery Hook up wrong | General | |||
(OT) Liberals: Hey you stupid flag-waving soldiers, what's wrong with you? | ASA |