"DSK" wrote in message
. ..

Maxprop wrote:

Not even close. They've been prejudicial toward my profession for years.
They've promoted a secular-progressive agenda, but have attempted to pass
themselves off as a non-partisan organization benefitting the elderly.

Non-partisan? Shucks in the last election they were panting & drooling for
President Bush.

My point exactly. Non-partisan means just that.

I think it's kind of funny, all the groups that have helped Bush
eventually get savaged by Karl Rove. There's a lesson here somewhere.

It's a matter of which happened first--Rove never "savaged" anyone who
didn't deserve it in his opinion. Not likely that he applied his political
wrath against a supporter. My guess is that those whom he maligned had
turned on the President. Let's face it--it's his job. Whatever gave you
the impression that politics is a nice, pretty business?

Max