On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 12:58:16 -0600, Gilligan wrote:


Clinton did nothing about all those US Embassies that were toppled,
nothing about the first WTC attack, nothing about the Cole.

The US Embassies? This article was written the day after Clinton
retaliated. Notice any familiar names?

http://www.cnn.com/US/9808/20/us.strikes.02/

And, the Republican response to this retaliation? Remember accusations of
"wag the dog"?

Uh, those involved with the first WTC attack are now in jail.

"In two separate jury trials in Manhattan federal court, half a dozen men were
later convicted of direct roles in the bombing. Mamed Salameh, Ahmad Ajaj,
Mahmud Abouhalima and Nidal Ayyad were found guilty in March 1994.

In November 1997, Ramzi Yousef was convicted of masterminding the plot,
and Eyad Ismoil was convicted for driving the rented Ryder truck into the
garage.

Each man was sentenced to 240 years in prison, or one year for every year
of expected life they deprived their victims."

Oh, and the USS Cole? That happened on Oct. 12, 2000, the month before
GWB was elected. Rather than be concerned with the last two months of
Clinton's term, a fairer question would be what did GWB do about in the
year he had before 9/11?

Give me a break. Try to actually cite facts. At least Clinton went after Bin
Laden. Bush didn't do anything until he had no choice after 9/11. Now, even
Afganistan is spiraling out of control.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Gilligan" wrote in message
. ..

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...

. At least Clinton tried to deal with it.


http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2...2/221552.shtml


His own Secretary of State may give him an "A" for effort, but look at
what really happened.

Clinton did nothing about all those US Embassies that were toppled,
nothing about the first WTC attack, nothing about the Cole.

Historically, the Democrats have really gotten us into big messes. VietNam
is just one example.

I don't think America should take the risk of voting for any Democrat.

You're joking. Those right-wingnuts are not interested in accepting
responcibility. The blame game is all they have.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Walt" wrote in message
...
Gilligan wrote:

Why are the Democrat's priorities on a homosexual former Congressman (who
most likely did not violate ANY law) rather than a crazed madman who just
blew off a nuke and claims he'll use them on the US?

I don't know. Why is the Republican's priorities all about blaming
everything on Clinton?

You guys might actually want to take responsibility for *something* at
some point, instead of making excuse after excuse after excuse for your
collosal failures.

//Walt

"Walt" wrote in message
...

Are you capable of speaking for yourself, or are you limited to passing
out links to propaganda sites?


Of course I can speak for myself.

I believe Bush is a bad President. He has no real principles and clings to
religion out of emptiness. Invading Iraq was a mistake. Spending has gone
through the roof under his watch. He caters to poltical interest with
handouts. The only thing good he has done are the tax cuts and balancing the
Supreme Court. I believe he gives big business preferential treatment over
small businesses and individuals. He is a threat to individual liberties and
freedom everywhere. I have never and will not ever vote for the clown. He is
better than any Democrat.

The propaganda links are for entertainment purposes only. Remember when I
presented both sides of the global warming issue and it totally confused
you? Well, now I'm critical of that demon Clinton and his satanic
administration and you think I'm a Republican. Then I go and criticize Bush
and now I bet you think I'm a Democrat.

The world is not black and white.

This election is a close one. With the world on the brink of total
annihilation I may actually hold my nose and pull the Republican levers down
the board. This is no time for clowning around, we cannot risk handing the
reins to the Democrats.

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
Give me a break. Try to actually cite facts. At least Clinton went after
Bin Laden. Bush didn't do anything until he had no choice after 9/11. Now,
even Afganistan is spiraling out of control.

http://www.suntimes.com/news/novak/7...ovak02.article

Haiti spiraled out of control for Clinton.

Well, in that case, he's one up on Bush. Afganistan and Iraq are out of
control and many lives have been lost as a result.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Gilligan" wrote in message
. ..

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
Give me a break. Try to actually cite facts. At least Clinton went after
Bin Laden. Bush didn't do anything until he had no choice after 9/11.
Now, even Afganistan is spiraling out of control.

http://www.suntimes.com/news/novak/7...ovak02.article

Haiti spiraled out of control for Clinton.

Yeah, as opposed to leaving the reins in the hands of incompetents... got
it.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Gilligan" wrote in message
. ..

"Walt" wrote in message
...

Are you capable of speaking for yourself, or are you limited to passing
out links to propaganda sites?


Of course I can speak for myself.

I believe Bush is a bad President. He has no real principles and clings to
religion out of emptiness. Invading Iraq was a mistake. Spending has gone
through the roof under his watch. He caters to poltical interest with
handouts. The only thing good he has done are the tax cuts and balancing
the Supreme Court. I believe he gives big business preferential treatment
over small businesses and individuals. He is a threat to individual
liberties and freedom everywhere. I have never and will not ever vote for
the clown. He is better than any Democrat.

The propaganda links are for entertainment purposes only. Remember when I
presented both sides of the global warming issue and it totally confused
you? Well, now I'm critical of that demon Clinton and his satanic
administration and you think I'm a Republican. Then I go and criticize
Bush and now I bet you think I'm a Democrat.

The world is not black and white.

This election is a close one. With the world on the brink of total
annihilation I may actually hold my nose and pull the Republican levers
down the board. This is no time for clowning around, we cannot risk
handing the reins to the Democrats.

Capt. JG wrote:
You're joking. Those right-wingnuts are not interested in accepting
responcibility. The blame game is all they have.

I never thought Clinton was a right wing nutcase.
hmmmmmmmmm

Joe

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Walt" wrote in message
...
Gilligan wrote:

Why are the Democrat's priorities on a homosexual former Congressman (who
most likely did not violate ANY law) rather than a crazed madman who just
blew off a nuke and claims he'll use them on the US?

I don't know. Why is the Republican's priorities all about blaming
everything on Clinton?

You guys might actually want to take responsibility for *something* at
some point, instead of making excuse after excuse after excuse for your
collosal failures.

//Walt

I believe Clinton has accepted responsibility for his mistakes, or at least
a few of them. Bushco thinks he's perfect, apparently.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Joe" wrote in message
oups.com...

Capt. JG wrote:
You're joking. Those right-wingnuts are not interested in accepting
responcibility. The blame game is all they have.

I never thought Clinton was a right wing nutcase.
hmmmmmmmmm

Joe

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Walt" wrote in message
...
Gilligan wrote:

Why are the Democrat's priorities on a homosexual former Congressman
(who
most likely did not violate ANY law) rather than a crazed madman who
just
blew off a nuke and claims he'll use them on the US?

I don't know. Why is the Republican's priorities all about blaming
everything on Clinton?

You guys might actually want to take responsibility for *something* at
some point, instead of making excuse after excuse after excuse for your
collosal failures.

//Walt

If Clinton did good by simply trying, shouldn't Bush get credit for trying
in Iraq?