Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Does anyone have experience with one of these main-furling systems?
I'm considering putting one on my current boat, if I choose to keep her for a while longer. But I'm open to other suggestions. I'm not a fan of in-mast furlers. Too risky, considering a jam with the sail half-furled could be disastrous to the sail--or boat-- if caught in a blow. And mast furlers don't allow for horizontal battens--I'm not sold on the new vertical battens yet. Any suggestions will be welcome. Max |
#2
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Any suggestions will be welcome. Well.....I've sailed a few boats this season with Dutchman's, stackpacks and in-spar furling systems. In mast furling and electric hoists are laughable...until you use them. I think the sto-boom has been around for 15 years or more and is well liked, but I've only seen it (on an Endeavor) and never used it underway. You will keep your old boom of course for the purist buyer coming at you. It seems like a bit too much trouble and expense if you're in any way serious about moving to a different boat. Do you have a stackpack or other system for handling the main? Also...are you aware of the swing batton systems for in mast furlers? RB 35s5 NY |
#3
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Capt. Rob" wrote in message ups.com... Do you have a stackpack or other system for handling the main? I have a lazy jack system from Sail Care, Inc. It uses shock cords in the lower part and holds the sail fairly well on the boom, even in wind. It also retracts against the mast when not in use. It's okay, but not as convenient as a roller boom. Also...are you aware of the swing batton systems for in mast furlers? Nope. Max |
#4
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Maxprop" wrote in message ink.net... Does anyone have experience with one of these main-furling systems? I'm considering putting one on my current boat, if I choose to keep her for a while longer. But I'm open to other suggestions. I'm not a fan of in-mast furlers. Too risky, considering a jam with the sail half-furled could be disastrous to the sail--or boat-- if caught in a blow. And mast furlers don't allow for horizontal battens--I'm not sold on the new vertical battens yet. Any suggestions will be welcome. Max Used in-mast furlers on both Tortola charters and they worked flawlessly. Only observation I can offer about Hood, from experience, is that their customer service is poor for older products. Don't know if this is common in the industry or not, could be that Hood isn't quite up to snuff as they are now owned by Pompanette, a French company! I think the biggest problem with the inmast systems would be that they are fairly expensive, and if they do fail would be a real pita to fix, probably. John Cairns |
#5
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Maxprop" wrote in message ink.net... Does anyone have experience with one of these main-furling systems? I'm considering putting one on my current boat, if I choose to keep her for a while longer. But I'm open to other suggestions. I'm not a fan of in-mast furlers. Too risky, considering a jam with the sail half-furled could be disastrous to the sail--or boat-- if caught in a blow. And mast furlers don't allow for horizontal battens--I'm not sold on the new vertical battens yet. Any suggestions will be welcome. My experience with in boom furling is dated.... but none of it would entice me to ever have such a system aboard any vessel I owned. Maybe they have improved the system since then. CM |
#6
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've had one in-mast furler jam and it took lots of
playihng with it to get it to furl. Consider what a have furled in mast sail will do when the wind picks up. The in boom furlers, if the fail, will at least let your drop the sail normally. Also the battens have to be vertical as you said, and the leech straight or hollow. I've read that the angle of the boom to the mast is critical for in-boom furlers. Even with this headache I think in boom is best option if you can afford $10k or more for a boom. Maxprop wrote: Does anyone have experience with one of these main-furling systems? I'm considering putting one on my current boat, if I choose to keep her for a while longer. But I'm open to other suggestions. I'm not a fan of in-mast furlers. Too risky, considering a jam with the sail half-furled could be disastrous to the sail--or boat-- if caught in a blow. And mast furlers don't allow for horizontal battens--I'm not sold on the new vertical battens yet. Any suggestions will be welcome. Max |
#7
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bart" wrote in message ups.com... I've had one in-mast furler jam and it took lots of playihng with it to get it to furl. Consider what a have furled in mast sail will do when the wind picks up. The in boom furlers, if the fail, will at least let your drop the sail normally. Also the battens have to be vertical as you said, and the leech straight or hollow. |
#8
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bart" wrote in message ups.com... I've had one in-mast furler jam and it took lots of playihng with it to get it to furl. Consider what a have furled in mast sail will do when the wind picks up. Yes, they are fine when they work but if they do not work you have big trouble. In a foresail the sailmaker can cut the sail to allow for the inevitable sag in the forestay. My boat has a Mack foresail which sets beautifully when unfurled and also has padding so that it also furls neatly. But a furling mainsail is constrained by being held within the mast. The foil on which the sail is rolled wants to sag in the middle like a forestay but it cannot. So, it sags as much as it can until further sag is resisted by friction between the sail and the slot from which it emerges. So there is always friction between the 'canvas' and the slots in the mast which is going to cause wear on the stitching and constant maintenance and there is always the possibility of the whole thing jamming. Since it is unlikely to jam while already furled it is most likely to jam while halfway back in and if you are caught out in increasing wind you will have real problems. So, for me, conventional reefing and lowering of the sail is the way to go for serious sailors. Just my 2 (kroners, pence or cents) worth. |
#9
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bart" wrote in message ups.com... I've had one in-mast furler jam and it took lots of playihng with it to get it to furl. Consider what a have furled in mast sail will do when the wind picks up. The in boom furlers, if the fail, will at least let your drop the sail normally. Also the battens have to be vertical as you said, and the leech straight or hollow. I've read that the angle of the boom to the mast is critical for in-boom furlers. Even with this headache I think in boom is best option if you can afford $10k or more for a boom. Your observations pretty much mirror my own, Bart. I'm just not a fan of truncated roaches and vertical battens, etc. Max |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Novice Sailboat Question: Help w/ Broken Boom | Cruising | |||
Eliminating boom bales | General | |||
what holds the boom up? (when the sail's down) | Cruising | |||
Perfect cruising bermuda dinghy | Boat Building | |||
Can ya hear the BOOM BOOM BOOM of celebrations in Bagdad | ASA |