Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jeff wrote: Capt. Rob wrote: The engine is predicted to need 65 HP to make hull speed. I have 10 extra HP. Bart, I'm no expert on engines, but that seems underpowered. No, it seems just about right, unless the priority is to go at hull speed regardless of the conditions or fuel cost. I thought hull speed should occur within 60-70% of rated horsepower in calm conditions. No. First of all, you don't really want to go a hull speed at all on most displacement sailboats because fuel usage will go up dramatically for the last 10% of speed. And while you don't don't to run a light diesel at 100% for long periods, 80-85% should work fine. At 60% you might start to worry that you're running too slow. The "rule of thumb" is that 1 HP per 500 pounds displacement gets you just shy of hull speed (S/L ratio of about 1.3). So you would need about 23 HP, Bart about 63. With your vessel's weight and wetted surface ratio, 10 extra HP seems way to low. A 46 foot J Boat carries a 76 HP engine, but doesn't it weigh a lot less than your boat? The J46 is about 6000 lbs lighter, so by my reckoning it could use a little less power. However, if you look at the Yanmar lineup, there is nothing at 64 hp; the next size down could certainly be viewed as too small. Also, the hull speed for the J is probably higher, both because of a longer waterline and because the achievable S/L ratio is probably somewhat higher than 1.34. I like your logic Jeff. My opinion also. The danger of going too small is not a happy one, while going too big is not a terrible penalty. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
free Happy Henry eBook | ASA | |||
free Happy Henry eBook | General | |||
So where is...................... | General | |||
HAPPY NEW YEAR 2005 | ASA | |||
Happy Times . . .for now | ASA |