"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
In article t,
Maxprop wrote:

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
In article .com,
Joe wrote:

Gilligan wrote:
http://reuters.myway.com/article/200...A-SPAT-DC.html

Baby Hugo is a wacko.

Anyone who buys Citco gasoline is putting money in his pocket.
We have one down the street, Regular is 2.07 but right across the
street Exxon Mobil is 2.09.

They are always 2 - 3 cents cheaper so they can suck in the dumb ****s
to stupid to know any better.

We should be paying $5/gallon.

Why? So the working poor will not be able to get to work? So those
without
the means to buy gasoline to fuel their cheap, older, but consumptive
vehicles will become completely insolvent, rather than just partially so?
So your Yugo will be vindicated?

So those who can afford to pay it will be forced to pay it. There
should be exemptions for the poor and for those who drive for a
living.

I, you, and most of the people on this ng can afford to pay
$5/gallon.

Of course. But many can't. How are you going to administer exemptions for
the working poor? The cost of the gummint's exemption program would
probably exceed the revenue taken in via the increased gasoline revenues.
Or hadn't you noticed how incredibly inefficient our federal gummint is?

Max

Profiling of course. If you're rich it's obvious, if you're not willing to
be obvious, you'll need to switch to a 80s model car.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Maxprop" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
In article t,
Maxprop wrote:

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
In article .com,
Joe wrote:

Gilligan wrote:
http://reuters.myway.com/article/200...A-SPAT-DC.html

Baby Hugo is a wacko.

Anyone who buys Citco gasoline is putting money in his pocket.
We have one down the street, Regular is 2.07 but right across the
street Exxon Mobil is 2.09.

They are always 2 - 3 cents cheaper so they can suck in the dumb ****s
to stupid to know any better.

We should be paying $5/gallon.

Why? So the working poor will not be able to get to work? So those
without
the means to buy gasoline to fuel their cheap, older, but consumptive
vehicles will become completely insolvent, rather than just partially so?
So your Yugo will be vindicated?

So those who can afford to pay it will be forced to pay it. There
should be exemptions for the poor and for those who drive for a
living.

I, you, and most of the people on this ng can afford to pay
$5/gallon.

Of course. But many can't. How are you going to administer exemptions
for the working poor? The cost of the gummint's exemption program would
probably exceed the revenue taken in via the increased gasoline revenues.
Or hadn't you noticed how incredibly inefficient our federal gummint is?

Max

Maxprop wrote:
"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
In article t,
Maxprop wrote:
"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
In article .com,
Joe wrote:
Gilligan wrote:
http://reuters.myway.com/article/200...A-SPAT-DC.html
Baby Hugo is a wacko.

Anyone who buys Citco gasoline is putting money in his pocket.
We have one down the street, Regular is 2.07 but right across the
street Exxon Mobil is 2.09.

They are always 2 - 3 cents cheaper so they can suck in the dumb ****s
to stupid to know any better.
We should be paying $5/gallon.
Why? So the working poor will not be able to get to work? So those
without
the means to buy gasoline to fuel their cheap, older, but consumptive
vehicles will become completely insolvent, rather than just partially so?
So your Yugo will be vindicated?
So those who can afford to pay it will be forced to pay it. There
should be exemptions for the poor and for those who drive for a
living.

I, you, and most of the people on this ng can afford to pay
$5/gallon.

Of course. But many can't. How are you going to administer exemptions for
the working poor? The cost of the gummint's exemption program would
probably exceed the revenue taken in via the increased gasoline revenues.
Or hadn't you noticed how incredibly inefficient our federal gummint is?

Max


Shish..next thing you're going to have him suggesting we go to ration
coupons...

Hmmm...... not a bad idea. :-)

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"katy" wrote in message
...
Maxprop wrote:
"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
In article t,
Maxprop wrote:
"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
In article .com,
Joe wrote:
Gilligan wrote:
http://reuters.myway.com/article/200...A-SPAT-DC.html
Baby Hugo is a wacko.

Anyone who buys Citco gasoline is putting money in his pocket.
We have one down the street, Regular is 2.07 but right across the
street Exxon Mobil is 2.09.

They are always 2 - 3 cents cheaper so they can suck in the dumb
****s
to stupid to know any better.
We should be paying $5/gallon.
Why? So the working poor will not be able to get to work? So those
without
the means to buy gasoline to fuel their cheap, older, but consumptive
vehicles will become completely insolvent, rather than just partially
so?
So your Yugo will be vindicated?
So those who can afford to pay it will be forced to pay it. There
should be exemptions for the poor and for those who drive for a
living.

I, you, and most of the people on this ng can afford to pay
$5/gallon.

Of course. But many can't. How are you going to administer exemptions
for the working poor? The cost of the gummint's exemption program would
probably exceed the revenue taken in via the increased gasoline revenues.
Or hadn't you noticed how incredibly inefficient our federal gummint is?

Max
Shish..next thing you're going to have him suggesting we go to ration
coupons...

Capt. JG wrote:
Hmmm...... not a bad idea. :-)

If that be the case we a;; ahd better learn how to get out of our slips
and channels by rowboat...ain't no way where we're at now to saol out....